The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

Month: July 2017

There Is No Major “Good” Government Leader

I can think of few things more pathetic than watching the reaction to something like the G20, and seeing regular people cheering for one leader over another.

There are no non-evil major leaders. I see a lot of Merkel praise lately, but this is the woman who destroyed Greece, causing many deaths and much suffering, because she wanted to bail out German banks indirectly, rather than directly. Over 90 percent of the money sent to “Greece” has actually gone back to banks, and the cost has been great misery. Merkel could have just bailed out the banks without harming the citizens.

Merkel is a truly, profoundly, evil person. If you think she isn’t, your moral compass is in your nether regions. Now, of course, like most leaders, Merkel has done some good, even praiseworthy things, but when you kill and impoverish an entire nation because your commitment to your ideology won’t let you just bail out banks directly, you’re evil.

This makes every major decision maker at the IMF evil (and for far more than just Greece) and certainly makes those EU decision makers involved evil.

Putin has many admirers, but he is a bad man, and if you don’t believe it, it is because you don’t want to know.

May is clearly evil. Trump has continued wars he could have and should have stopped. Those of you who love Obama, who is no longer in power, love an evil man, who destroyed Libya for no good reason and expanded and ran a huge assassination program. Macron is scum, he ran Hollande’s economic policy, which was a mess, and he has spent the summer fighting unions. His economic policy won’t work–on the contrary, it will hurt a lot of people. Bill Clinton was scum; his embargo of Iraq cost about a million civilian lives, half of whom were children. He was okay with that.

There are almost no exceptions: Everyone who runs a major country in this period is evil. Generally, there isn’t even a case of being able to say, “Well, they’ve done some bad things, but the good they’ve done outweighs it.” None of them are FDR, where you can say, “That’s clearly evil, but at least he did more good than evil.”

None of these people are your friends. None of them have your best interest at heart. None of them care about your civil liberties, freedom, or prosperity; whether you live or die is a matter of indifference to them. (Well, there is a small class of people they do care about. If you’re one of those people and happen to read me, you know who you are.)

The reason I am behind Corbyn so vehemently is that, for the first time in my life, there is a candidate with a serious chance of running a major power who isn’t “the lesser evil.” Even Sanders was a lesser evil candidate; albeit a heck of a lot lesser. Corbyn was against all the wars. He supports Palestinians, etc, etc. He isn’t perfect, but he’s easily in the “far more good than evil” camp. Note just how much the press and almost everyone else in the elite hates him.

If he gets in power, we’ll see how he does, but at least he has an actual record of integrity and doing the right thing, when he had every reason to believe that it meant he’d never be in power.

None of that is true of Merkel, Trump, Obama, May, etc.

You are their meat. You are their subjects. Your existence matters to them only to the extent you serve their ambition and their ideology, and no more. They have somewhat less care for you than a farmer shows for his cows.

Knowing who has your best interests at heart, who actually cares about you and will act on it, is the most basic human survival skill. We were very good at it back when we lived in bands of 40 to 60 people, but we are terrible at it when living in societies of millions, when we don’t know who everyone is.

We’d best learn, because our failure is costing us dearly, and it will cost us more in the future.


The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

 

France’s Macron Wants a Technocratic Presidential State

Rizal Park Tricolor

So, Macron has a huge majority, won on an historically low turnout. He has spent the summer fighting France’s Labor unions, his first priority being to overhaul France’s labor laws. For example, right now, workers can’t be made to answer emails outside of work hours. Macron will end that.

Of course, the changes are far more wide-ranging than that. The long argument has been that France’s economy isn’t all that it could be because it is not flexible: It’s hard to fire people, and you can’t make them do anything you want them to when you manage them. Arguably, you can make them do very little.

Macron, who ran the vastly unpopular economic policy of the last government (something people seem to have forgotten) is a dedicated technocrat.

In his recent speech, Macron said he wanted to shrink the legislature by one third, from over 900. And he thinks that the legislature should legislate less, and just judge what the executive does. This amounts, of course, to passing only bills suggested by him. Additionally, and of course, his party controls both houses of parliament right now, but this goes beyond normal French politics, where bills are not just suggested by the President and Prime Minister.

(The President appoints the Prime Minister, and the PM is then generally seen as following the President in most things.)

So this isn’t a small thing, it’s Macron saying he wants the power of a Westminister-style Prime Minister with a solid majority. Generally and theoretically, in this type of country, parliament can not simply do what the President orders. But in these days of tight party discipline, a PM with a majority is, in practice, close to being an elected dictator.

Such strong executives have their advantages, no doubt, but Macron does want a change that gives him more power, and he’s willing to go to a plebiscite to get it.

Then he will use it to remove French workers’ rights and reduce their wages and benefits. Because that is what he wants; it is the core neoliberal project, in which Macron is a true believer.

Macron is “young” but he’s not that young; he’s of the generation in which if you wanted to be taken seriously, and have any power, you had to sign on to neoliberal verities.

The French are going to get what they voted for, good and hard.

But little to none of what Macron does cannot be undone, and his making the executive more powerful may turn out to be a mistake in five or ten years, when someone like LaPen or Melenchon becomes president and wields those powers for which Macron fought.

Simply put, neoliberal policies never actually work. They can produce brief sugar highs of frothy economies, and France may get some of that, as money boils away from the middle and up to the top and housing bubbles and others stupidity are engaged. But this is late neoliberalism, the French middle class and poor are already suffering, and I don’t think enough bribes will be given to them to keep them onboard. They gave Macron a huge majority, yes, but on low turnout. This is neoliberalism’s last big chance in France.

When it fails, and it will, the French will turn either to the right or to the left. Within a decade, most likely.

And the boy prince, riding so high now, will be left spluttering like Tony Blair, wondering why all his wonderful plans didn’t work out, and assuming that those who reject his brilliance are buffoons.

So it shall be.


The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

Happy Independence Day

US Constitution by KJD

I sometimes wonder if the world would have been a better place of the rebels had lost their war against Britain. Be clear, I’m not saying it would have been, I’m just wondering. In general terms, the released settler colonies turned out reasonably well; Britain got rid of slavery before the US and with less violence, though I’m guessing an attempt to ban it in the US would have caused a second rebellion, and so on.

On the other hand, it’s unquestionable that Britain did try and keep colonies from industrializing up until quite late. Mind you, during the Victorian period this became less of an issue, and, indeed, British money and resources were key to industrializing a number of countries, including Canada and the United States, though Canada never did fully industrialize. That, however, can probably be put down more to its low population and large land mass with associated resources than to anything malign.

In any case, I wish my American readers a happy Independence day. Your country has done some good in the world, and great evil, but that’s true of many nation. The last few decades have been hard for you, and by you, and it is my wish for America that you treat both yourselves and other better. The two are related: One of the reasons Americans are mean to others is that they are mean to themselves; and the reverse is true.

May you be well, and the cause of the wellness of others.


The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.

Happy Canada Day

Canadian Flag

Canadian Flag

Sure as heck not a perfect country, but one of the better places you can be born in the world today.

Page 2 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén