The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

Author: Tony Wikrent Page 1 of 43

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – July 06, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – July 06, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

Welcome to the Age of Disappearance: America’s new era of secret police 

Hamilton Nolan, July 02, 2025 [How Things Work]

…an avalanche of new funding for the Department of Homeland Security, ICE, and anti-immigration measures is, in fact, coming. This is going to spill well past the bounds of what any sane person would consider to be “immigration enforcement.” It is going to create a lavishly funded, unaccountable, quasi-secret police force that will transform our nation for the worse. Very soon.

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the terrifying scale of this new funding. This bill contains enough money to build a new system of immigration detention centers far bigger than the entire federal prison system. The American Immigration Council says that it will be enough to facilitate the “daily detention of at least 116,000 non-citizens.” It will let ICE hire more field agents than the FBI. Its $170 billion in funding for Stephen Miller’s rabid campaign to purge America of brown people is comparable to the total annual funding for the United States Army.

Donald Trump envisions himself as an all-powerful leader whose will is equal to law. He is bent on revenge against his political enemies. He has installed extreme loyalists in the Justice Department, the FBI, the Defense Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and all other security departments. The courts have declined to meaningfully restrain his abuses of these departments. This budget will give him the final piece of the puzzle that he needs to achieve his fever dream: a nationwide army of masked, unaccountable armed agents empowered to snatch anyone they like off the streets, and the physical infrastructure to imprison or deport those people at will. Thousands of men with guns, unrestrained by judges or local police, who do not answer to Congress, who point guns at the press, who arrest whoever they want, for reasons they do not share, and do whatever they wish with those people. The implications of this are going to make America a much darker place….

…ICE has already arrested a number of Democratic elected officials, including mayors and members of Congress and a judge. In this environment, it is a trivial matter for Trump and his loyalists to concoct reasons to arrest almost anyone. People can be arrested if they are immigrants, if they look like they might be immigrants, if they illegally harbored or assisted immigrants, or if they somehow impeded ICE’s quest to arrest immigrants. The mission can and will be scaled up from “deport immigrants” to “punish those who want to stand in the way of our mission.”….

16 Thoughts On The Republican Budget Atrocity

Brian Beutler, July 03, 2025 [Off Message]

  • Quite apart from the economics, this secret police force and the prison network that will be built for it, is the most repugnant and frightening aspect of the bill; Medicaid can be funded again, food stamps can be funded again, clean energy can be funded, taxes can be increased progressively. But an immigrant prison network, overseen by Trump-loyal paramilitaries, with no resources for due process, will be very hard to dislodge, and could easily be turned against the citizenry. This is Stephen Miller’s wet dream and it will stain the whole country….

Trump falsely questions Zohran Mamdani’s citizenship, threatens to arrest him over ICE operations 

[ABC, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]

Trump’s Threat to Deport Mamdani Isn’t a Joke 

Ken Klippensteinm, July 3, 2025

Last month, according to an internal memo, the Justice Department ordered its attorneys to “prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings” — the process by which naturalized Americans can be stripped of their citizenship — not for fraud or criminality, but “against individuals who pose a potential danger to national security.”

Strategic Political Economy

There’s a Race to Power the Future. China Is Pulling Away

[New York Times, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]

Beijing is selling clean energy to the world, Washington is pushing oil and gas. Both are driven by national security….

While China still burns more coal than the rest of the world and emits more climate pollution than the United States and Europe combined, its pivot to cleaner alternatives is happening at breakneck speed. Not only does China already dominate global manufacturing of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries, E.V.s and many other clean energy industries, but with each passing month it is widening its technological lead….

China has also begun to dominate nuclear power, a highly technical field once indisputably led by the United States. China not only has 31 reactors under construction, nearly as many as the rest of the world combined, but has announced advances in next-generation nuclear technologies and also in fusion, the long-promised source of all-but-limitless clean energy that has bedeviled science for years.

Global power shift

BRICS Without China? Xi’s No-Show at Summit in Brazil Is No Coincidence 

[YouTube, via Naked Capitalism 07-05-2025]

[Yves Smith: “This video does not consider the thesis that another well-substantiated video argued: that Xi had not made a single appearance outside his residence after a sudden absence during a major party event. The thesis is he had a health crisis, which kicked off a power struggle, and he is now under house arrest. Even if this is false, BRICS is playing out as we predicted: all hat and no cattle (ex facilitating bilateral trade financial plumbing, which is very important). Even Mohammed Marandi, when Nima brought up BRICS in the past week, almost sighed when Nima mentioned BRICS and said what mattered was not BRICS but the idea of BRICS and organizations like the SCO which were advancing the BRICS philosophy. That correction said to me was Marandi signaling that BRICS has been overhyped and the focus needs to be on the paramount BRICS aim of multipolarity, and not the supposed organization, which as of today, does not even have a budget.”]

U.S. Attorney General calls Mexico a “foreign adversary”

[Guadalajara Post, June 27, 2025]

Gaza / Palestine / Israel / Iran

Quiet, West Bank Pogrom in Progress 

[Haaretz, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]

Israeli army purchases frozen as drones worth millions lost in Iran

[Middle East Monitor, June 30, 2025]

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has suspended new military purchases amid concerns about a potential new round of fighting with Iran, following the loss of dozens of drones worth millions of dollars over Iranian territory.

According to Ynet, the Israeli Ministry of Finance is refusing to approve a 60-billion-shekel ($16.2 billion) increase requested by the Ministry of Defence to cover the costs of the recent conflict with Iran and the ongoing Operation Gideon’s Chariots in Gaza. Both operations were not part of the approved 2025 state budget….

Chilling Maps Show: Iran’s Missiles Obliterated Israeli Neighborhoods

Bar Peleg, Ran Shimoni, Adi Hashmonai, Jun 30, 2025 [Haaretz]

From Tamra to Tel Aviv and further south, Israeli engineers’ maps show how a shock wave from Iran’s ballistic missiles can be as ruinous as a direct hit….

In Tel Aviv, 480 buildings have been damaged, many of them badly, at five separate sites. In Ramat Gan, it’s 237 buildings at three sites, about 10 badly. In another Tel Aviv suburb, Bat Yam, 78 buildings were damaged by one hit; 22 will have to be razed.

The Israel Tax Authority has received applications for financial assistance for nearly 33,000 damaged structures. Another 4,450 files have been opened for the loss of belongings and equipment, and another 4,119 for damaged vehicles….
Peter Haenseler, 5 July 2025 [Sonar21]
Thomas Neuburger, July 01, 2025 [God’s Spies]
Chris Hedges, July 2, 2025

The latest report submitted by Francesca Albanese, Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, lists 48 corporations and institutions, including Palantir Technologies Inc., Lockheed Martin, Alphabet Inc., Amazon, International Business Machine Corporation (IBM), Caterpillar Inc., Microsoft Corporation and Massachusetts Institue of Technology (MIT), along with banks and financial firms such as Blackrock, insurers, real estate firms and charities, which in violation of international law are making billions from the occupation and the genocide of Palestinians.

Oligarchy
The Oligarchs’ Big Prize in Trump’s Budget-Busting Bill

Timothy Noah, July 3, 2025 [The New Republic]

Avoiding an income-tax increase is nice, but that’s not the bill’s greatest gift to the rich….

The oligarchs’ real prize in the reconciliation bill is the continuation or possible expansion of a 2017 change in the tax code so tedious to explain that most news accounts haven’t bothered. Some people call it the qualified business income deduction, others call it the pass-through deduction, and still others just call it Section 199A. It’s a deduction of 23 percent (House version) or 20 percent (Senate version) on business income that “passes through,” untaxed, to a private individual, who then pays taxes on it as personal rather than corporate income. The rationale for this deduction is that business income shouldn’t be taxed at a maximum 37 percent rate when the corporate income tax is only 21 percent.

Are you bored yet? If so, you’re exactly where the oligarchs want you. Maybe you’ll perk up if I tell you this tax cut will add to the budget deficit either $820 billion (House version) or $736 billion (Senate version). More than half the benefit will go to millionaires.

Pass-through income is a key driver of income inequality. Between 1985 and 2021, the top 1 percent in the income distribution increased its share of the nation’s income from 13 percent to more than 25 percent. The majority of that increase came from pass-through income. Defenders of the pass-through tax break will tell you that most pass-through businesses are small businesses, and that’s true. But the majority of income from pass-through businesses goes to the rich. In 2011, 70 percent of all pass-through income went to the top 1 percent; the 2017 tax break almost certainly pushed that proportion higher….

Chartbook 394 “A City we can afford”: capitalism and democracy in New York 

Adam Tooze [via Naked Capitalism 06-30-2025]

…The idea that democracy might enable the majority of Americans to proactively distribute significantly greater resources away from the rich towards public services and those most in need, has come to seem increasingly quaint. At this moment, Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill, a huge tax giveaway for the upper class, is moving through Congress. It will be profoundly regressive in its impact.

But within the frame of a city like New York, with a tightly packed population of 8.5 million, the distributional struggle takes on a rather different hue. In New York City the trade offs and conflicts feel real. The rich, the middle class and the poor cannot avoid each other, as they often do in the rest of the USA. Through shared infrastructure like schools or overcrowded and dangerous streets, the competition for scarce housing and the cost of everyday necessities, the struggle of competing purchasing power and class differentiation is played out in plain view. Meanwhile, the shocking state of the subway brings home viscerally the many failures of public policy. How can a city of such wealth be reliant on a system of such shabby, stinking decrepitude? It is not by accident that New York City’s upper class fear democracy more than their counterparts in much of the rest of the country. Here there might actually be a majority in favor or redistribution, major market regulation and against privatization. De facto, New York City’s taxing powers are limited. Mamdani is talking about a few percentage points for those earning more than a million dollars a year. Everything requires approval by Albany, the far more conservative state-capital, 140 miles to the North. But, to prevent these questions even being posed, the backlash against Mamdani will be intense and it will be very well funded.

That backlash will be led by big money from New York’s rich upper class. As the voting data suggest, his support dwindled fast amongst those with incomes more than $150,000. At the upper end, there are 28,000, or so, New Yorkers who filed income tax on adjusted gross income (AGI) of more than $1 million, accounted for 0.7% of all tax filers, 35.6% of the AGI, and 42.4% of NYC Personal Income Tax (PIT) liability. Roughly 4400 individuals declared more than $ 5 million or more. And 1600 made $10 million or more. That group, who amounted to 0.04% of the total returns in 2011-2021, accounted for 17.9% of the AGI, and 21.3% of NYC income tax paid. 123 people on the Forbes list of billionaires are registered as living in the city….

The war on America’s radicals: Mamdani is only the latest victim 

B. Duncan Moench, July 4, 2025 [Unherd, via Naked Capitalism 07-06-2025]

…Muslims and non-Western religions aren’t the only groups that have been met with prejudice by the country’s Anglo-Protestant majority either. Even the Mormons, arguably the whitest — and most Middle American — of heterodox religious groups had to abandon its practice of polygamy and dismantle their vast communal economic system before the Utah territory could be admitted as a state. Yes, Catholics, Jews, and Mormons were eventually welcomed into the American mainstream during the 20th century. But that only happened after a full century of cultural, and political, Anglo-centric assimilation. Each group had to prove they embraced Republican versions of democracy, Anglo-liberal “free” market economics and, no less important, Anglo-Americans’ unique take on the Protestant work ethic, which equates state support with personal failure….

In American political culture, however, the establishment has eagerly worshipped “wealth creators” while demeaning wage workers as lazy or entitled. This occurs regularly despite the fact that the US has, by far, the weakest labour protections and stingiest welfare state among wealthy industrialised nations. This mentality emerged early in the industrial era, as elites embraced a Robber Baron-style capitalist triumphalism, intertwined with the survival-of-the-fittest ethos promoted by Social Darwinists like William Graham Sumner. The only serious resistance ever mounted against this ideology was the New Deal coalition, built on Franklin Roosevelt’s political genius and relentless popular appeal. The American establishment hysterically condemn Mamdani because they can sense he might have that same potential.
Despite Roosevelt’s unparalleled four-term popularity, when the New Deal coalition collapsed in the Seventies, the role of labour unions and the state in building up middle-class stability began to disappear from the national narrative. In its place, identity politics rose up to become the face of American “Leftism”. As the language of identity replaced the language of class, the establishment’s long-standing worship of wealth and material success became stronger still. That ultimately paved the way for Wall Street plunder and modern Silicon Valley hyper-feudalism where, since 1975, approximately $79 trillion has been redistributed from the bottom 90% of American workers to the top 1%.
This astoundingly regressive wealth redistribution must, of course, be justified by ideology. That’s where the Social Darwinism of thinkers like Sumner come in, offering a uniquely American cauldron of disdain for the needy and indigent….
Despite the bemoaning of Mamdani as nothing more than a spoiled woke socialist, his surprising political success derives from his rejection of identity-victimhood fixations and — like FDR before him — his refusal to accept the elite dogma that the state is powerless to improve the economic conditions of everyday people.
Mamdani is routinely portrayed as a demonic immigrant antichrist for the same reason the German 48ers were declared an existential threat, despite their small numbers and political irrelevance. These early rebels openly challenged America’s LASP norms and dared to advocate for a different — multicultural and multi-ideological — vision of the country. Mamdani seems set to do the same. Whether or not you support his policies, the intensity of the reaction from the national media and Right-wing influencers toward a mayor’s race, in a place most of them openly hate, reveals something deeper, almost unconscious….

The Common Sense of a Wealth Tax: Thomas Paine & Taxation as Freedom from Aristocracy

Jeremy Bearer-FriendVanessa Williamson, 1 January 2022 [Scholarly Commons]

The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

Don’t blame China — Blame Milton Friedman

[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 06-29-2025]

William Huo

Exhibit Q8: The Empire That Milton Built. Then Gutted.America is in decline. But this wasn’t caused by China, or Russia, or immigration, or wokeism. The culprit is Milton Friedman. And the class that turned his ideas into a wrecking ball. (1/17)
Friedman taught that the only social responsibility of business is to increase profits. From that seed grew a system that stripped America to its studs and sold the drywall to China. (2/17)
….
This wasn’t some invisible hand. It was conscious policy. The WTO, NAFTA, and permanent MFN status for China all served the same goal. Eliminate borders for capital. Trap labor in place. (6/17)

Surveillance pricing lets corporations decide what your dollar is worth

[Pluralistic, via The Big Picture July 03, 2025]

What if you show up at the hotel at 9pm and the hotelier can ask a credit bureau how much you can afford to pay for the room? What if they can find out that you’re in chemotherapy, so you don’t have the stamina to shop around for a cheaper room? What if they can tell that you have a 5AM flight and need to get to bed right now?

That Dropped Call With Customer Service? It Was on Purpose 

Chris Colin, June 29, 2025 [The Atlantic]

Endless wait times and excessive procedural fuss—it’s all part of a tactic called “sludge.” ….

…On the contrary, I told her, I needed to hear every detail. Tentatively at first, she told me about a family trip to Sweden that had been scuttled by COVID. What followed was a protracted war involving denied airline refunds, unusable vouchers, expired vouchers, and more. Other guests from the party began drifting over. One recounted a recent Verizon nightmare. Another had endured Kafkaesque tech support from Sonos. The stories kept coming: gym-quitting labyrinths, Airbnb hijinks, illogical conversations with the permitting office, confounding interactions with the IRS. People spoke of not just the money lost but the hours, the sanity, the basic sense that sense can prevail.

Taken separately, these hassles and indignities were funny anecdotes. Together, they suggested something unreckoned with. And everyone agreed: It was all somehow getting worse. In 2023 (the most recent year for which data are available), the National Customer Rage Survey showed that American consumers were, well, full of rage. The percentage seeking revenge—revenge!—for their hassles had tripled in just three years….
When I started talking with people about their sludge stories, I noticed that almost all ended the same way—with a weary, bedraggled Fuck it. Beholding the sheer unaccountability of the system, they’d pay that erroneous medical bill or give up on contesting that ticket. And this isn’t happening just here and there. Instead, I came to see this as a permanent condition. We are living in the state of Fuck it.
Some of the sludge we submit to is unavoidable—the simple consequence of living in a big, digitized world.
But some of it is by design. ProPublica showed in 2023 how Cigna saved millions of dollars by rejecting claims without having doctors read them, knowing that a limited number of customers would endure the process of appeal. (Cigna told ProPublica that its description was “incorrect.”) Later that same year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered Toyota’s motor-financing arm to pay $60 million for alleged misdeeds that included thwarting refunds and deliberately setting up a dead-end hotline for canceling products and services. (The now-diminished bureau canceled the order in May.) As one Harvard Business Review article put it, “Some companies may actually find it profitable to create hassles for complaining customers.”

The Business of Betting on Catastrophe

[The MIT Press Reader, via The Big Picture June 30, 2025]

World Bank pandemic bonds paid out only after death tolls passed a threshold. They’re part of a booming market where investors turn calamity into capital.

U.S. Imported Food Reliance Worsens: Food Trade Deficit Alert! 

[Rethink Trade, via Naked Capitalism 07-04-2025]

Key findings:

  • The United States’ food trade deficit reached $58.7 billion in 2024. The $46 billion increase in the gap since 2015 is driven by a $42.7 billion increase in imports.
  • The United States has been in a food trade deficit since 2015 and an agricultural trade deficit—which includes fiber, forestry, and industrial products—since 2017.
  • Several goods commonly found on the Fourth of July barbecue table have trade deficits, including beef, potatoes, tomatoes, watermelon, ketchup, and beer.
  • The majority of the grain and oilseed milling products, fruits and tree nuts, and seafood consumed in the United States are imports. The import share of consumption for many foods, both manufactured and non-manufactured, is increasing.
  • The U.S. food trade deficit likely cannot be addressed by increasing exports. Despite food exports to top trade partners and in top export categories increasing, the deficit continues to widen on growing imports.

Trumpillnomics

Republicans Are Cutting Medicare. Not Only Medicaid, Medicare. 

David Dayen, July 3, 2025 [The American Prospect]

… Republicans have created another problem. They didn’t just cut Medicaid; they also have forced nearly half a trillion dollars in cuts to Medicare, the health program for the elderly.

Because of a statutory requirement to automatically impose budget cuts when legislation increases the deficit, the Big Beautiful Bill would require automatic sequestration cuts across the board, something that has been confirmed by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) but has been largely absent from the debate over the bill. Medicare is one of the programs that will face the axe, and the damage sums to $490 billion over the next ten years, starting in the next fiscal year that begins in October. While many of the safety-net cuts in the bill are delayed to help Republicans with their re-election campaigns, the Medicare cuts must begin next year….

A List of Nearly Everything in the G.O.P. Bill, and How Much It Would Cost or Save

Alicia Parlapiano, Margot Sanger-Katz, Aatish Bhatia and Josh Katz [New York Times]

Below is a table that lists how nearly every provision would affect the federal budget over 10 years, as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office in an analysis published Sunday. The budget office measured the legislation as it usually does, taking into account the cost of extending expiring tax cuts. This is a different approach than the one embraced by the Senate’s leaders. The C.B.O. analysis does not include a handful of policy provisions that do not have direct effects on the federal deficit.

Trump Gets To Sign His Big Ugly Bill Today Because… CONGRESS ALWAYS CHICKENS OUT

Howie Klein, July 04, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

Trump, reports some of the Republicans who met with him in the last few days, doesn’t even know what’s in the bill. According to 3 of the congress members, the increasingly senile Señor TACO told them at one of the meetings that there are 3 things Congress shouldn’t touch if they want to win elections: Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. One member said to Trump that “But we’re touching Medicaid in this bill.”

Heather Cox Richardson, ​​​​​​​June 28, 2025 [Letters from an American]

In Politico today, Meredith Lee Hill reported that “[e]very major health system in Louisiana is warning [House] Speaker Mike Johnson [R-LA] and the rest of the state’s congressional delegation that the Senate [Republicans’] planned Medicaid cuts ‘would be historic in their devastation.’” The Senate’s revised measure will hurt healthcare and undermine the state’s budget, they wrote. But “[t]hese economic consequences pale in comparison to the harm that will be caused to residents across the state, regardless of insurance status, who will no longer be able to get the care that they need.”

Trump and the GOP Will Regret the Day They Passed This Sick Bill

Michael Tomasky, July 3, 2025 [The New Republic]

Here’s the important question to ponder: Why is this happening? What kind of people want to close rural hospitals? What kind of people want veterans to stop being able to buy decent groceries? Answering these questions teaches us a lot about what’s become of the Republican Party over the last three-plus decades.

The seminal moment in this history isn’t Trump coming down that escalator. In fact, it has nothing to do with Trump.

The year was 1990. At an impromptu meeting at Andrews Air Force Base with congressional leaders, President George H.W. Bush agreed to the last tax increase that a critical mass of Republicans backed. The tax increase was responsible fiscal policy— the deficit had jumped significantly since 1989—and in fact the revenue, and other spending caps in the bill, helped stabilize the country’s finances. But all anyone remembers is that Bush broke his “read my lips” campaign pledge not to raise taxes.

Ever since, Republican domestic policy has consisted entirely of two prongs: cutting taxes, overwhelmingly for the rich; cutting spending, overwhelmingly for, or one should say “on,” working-class and poor people. This is who they are.

Within that broad category, there are three camps….

Construction spending continues contraction, amplifying yellow flag caution from manufacturing 

[Angry Bear, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]

They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

GOP is stripping healthcare from millions knowing it will kill them–they should be charged with murder!

Dean Obeidallah, June 30, 2025

The GOP is about to approve the “the biggest rollback in federal support for health care ever,” as Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF told The Washington Post. More than 12 million people (up to 16 million) will lose healthcare due to GOP’s cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act to fund a tax cut for their wealthy donors.

Stripping Americans of healthcare will kill people. Literally.

The GOP knows this but doesn’t care. The only question is: Does their actions rise to the level of manslaughter or even murder?!

What’s the cruelty to do this, to take health insurance away from people?
Heather Cox Richardson, June 30, 2025 [Letters from an American]

…Senator King continued: “I don’t understand the obsession and I never have…with taking health insurance away from people. I don’t get it. Trying to take away the Affordable Care Act in 2017 or 2018 and now this. What’s driving this? What’s the cruelty to do this, to take health insurance away from people knowing that it’s going to cost them…up to and including…their lives.”

In fact, the drive to slash health insurance is part of the Republicans’ determination to destroy the modern government.

Grover Norquist, an employee of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and one of the key architects of the Republican argument that the solution to societal ills is tax cuts, in 2010 described to Rebecca Elliott of the Harvard Crimson how he sees the role of government. “Government should enforce [the] rule of law,” he said. “It should enforce contracts, it should protect people bodily from being attacked by criminals. And when the government does those things, it is facilitating liberty. When it goes beyond those things, it becomes destructive to both human happiness and human liberty.”

Norquist vehemently opposed taxation, saying that “it’s not any of the government’s business who earns what, as long as they earn it legitimately,” and proposed cutting government spending down to 8% of gross domestic product, or GDP, the value of the final goods and services produced in the United States.

The last time the level of government spending was at that 8% of GDP was 1933, before the New Deal. In that year, after years of extraordinary corporate profits, the banking system had collapsed, the unemployment rate was nearly 25%, prices and productivity were plummeting, wages were cratering, factories had shut down, farmers were losing their land to foreclosure. Children worked in the fields and factories, elderly and disabled people ate from garbage cans, unregulated banks gambled away people’s money, and business owners treated their workers as they wished. Within a year the Great Plains would be blowing away as extensive deep plowing had damaged the land, making it vulnerable to drought. Republican leaders insisted the primary solution to the crisis was individual enterprise and private charity.

They Will Not Kill Us Without A Fight — 38 moral witnesses were arrested today for refusing to accept policy murder

William J. Barber, II and Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, June 30, 2025 [Our Moral Moment]

Michigan Republican Mike Rogers Sells Out To The Same Crypto-Cartel He Once Warned Us About

Howie Klein, July 03, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

…It’s hard to overstate the danger of what’s unfolding here. The “crypto cartel” isn’t just a convenient phrase; it’s a rapidly metastasizing force in American politics, a moneyed clique of deregulation-obsessed financiers, libertarian tech bros, and shadowy offshore interests who are buying influence across party lines, whether Slotkin, Gallego, Kirsten Gillibrand, Adam Schiff, Shontel Brown, Ritchie Torres, Josh Gottheimer, Angie Craig, Donald Davis, Maxwell Frost… on Team Blue or Lummis, Tom Emmer, Ted Budd, Katie Britt, Jim Banks, Young Kim, David Valadao, Byron Donalds, Randy Fine on Team Red. Many of them have no foundational ideology beyond profit, no loyalty beyond their wallets and no concern for the democratic process—unless it can be bent, hacked or just plain purchased outright….

Dave DeCamp, June 29, 202 [DefendDemocracy.Press]
Restoring balance to the economy

Green Social Housing: Lessons from Vienna

[Climate and Community Institute, June 2025]

Vienna is the global capital of social housing. Over 40 percent of the city’s housing units are social housing, providing homes for the majority of the city’s renters. And, as the city’s population has grown over the past two decades, Vienna has continued to build affordable, beautiful social housing, where doctors live next to janitors and grandparents live down the street from their grandkids. Today, Vienna’s social housing shelters residents from both real estate speculation and climate breakdown.

Ezra Klein Meets Zohran Mamdani

Robert Kuttner, July 3, 2025 [The American Prospect]

…Klein has the germ of a valid argument, but he has been widely criticized, including in these pages, for ignoring the broader issue of corporate power in determining what government actually does. For example, the collapse of housing construction after 2008 was not the result of a sudden increase in zoning obstacles. It was the result of Wall Street’s subprime scam.

U.S. GDP per capita is a robust $89,000. That’s almost $360,000 for a family of four—if it were distributed equally. But of course, the economy becomes more unequal every year. On average, there is plenty of abundance. The problem is maldistribution, financialization, and oligarchy….

Klein has scoffed at Mamdani’s idea of publicly owned supermarkets in food deserts, pointing out that supermarket chains operate on very low margins. But Klein misses the fact that Mamdani is proposing grocery pilots in places where the chains don’t find it profitable to operate at all. Several small towns in red-state America that have lost chain stores already have municipally owned food markets.

Klein also misses the fact that high retail food prices are substantially the result not of excessive markups by chains, but extreme consolidation and price-gouging by producers, for which the remedy is antitrust. In addition, if smaller stores could get the same pricing from food wholesalers as the big-box chains—something that is required by law under the Robinson-Patman Act—they could compete in these food deserts. A city-owned grocery in New York would have the resources to bring Robinson-Patman cases and create a level playing field.

Disrupting mainstream economics

This July 4, Where is America’s Land of Opportunity?

Colin Woodard, July 4, 2025 [Washington Monthly]

The geographies of upward mobility show U.S. regions that emphasize investments in the common good over economic libertarianism do better

Why the Federal Reserve doesn’t understand the monetary system that it’s supposed to manage

Steve Keen, June 30, 2025 [Building a New Economics]

Information age dystopia / surveillance state

Ex-CISA Official Warns: We’ve Gutted Cybersecurity—A Gift to Iran, China and Russia

Lynn Parramore, June 30, 2025 [Institute for New Economic Thinking]

Interview by Lynn Parramore featuring Dr. David Mussington, cybersecurity expert with two decades of experience [including with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)], reveals why the clock is ticking on U.S.  vulnerabilities under Trump.

Landmark AI ruling is a blow to authors and artists

[Popular Information, via The Big Picture June 29, 2025]

Books are particularly valuable for LLMs precisely because humans have taken such care to produce them. If you want to teach a computer the nuances of many different topics — and how to write clearly — there is no substitute for books. But when it came time to train Claude, Anthropic did not start by buying books. Instead, it “downloaded for free millions of copyrighted books in digital form from pirate sites on the internet,” including books by the three authors who filed the lawsuit.

The End of Publishing as We Know It

[The Atlantic, via The Big Picture June 29, 2025]

…Chatbots have proved adept at keeping users locked into conversations. They do so by answering every question, often through summarizing articles from news publishers. Suddenly, fewer people are traveling outside the generative-AI sites—a development that poses an existential threat to the media, and to the livelihood of journalists everywhere.
According to one comprehensive study, Google’s AI Overviews—a feature that summarizes web pages above the site’s usual search results—has already reduced traffic to outside websites by more than 34 percent. The CEO of DotDash Meredith, which publishes PeopleBetter Homes & Gardens, and Food & Wine, recently said the company is preparing for a possible “Google Zero” scenario….
Book publishers, especially those of nonfiction and textbooks, also told me they anticipate a massive decrease in sales, as chatbots can both summarize their books and give detailed explanations of their contents. Publishers have tried to fight back, but my conversations revealed how much the deck is stacked against them. The world is changing fast, perhaps irrevocably. The institutions that comprise our country’s free press are fighting for their survival….

The Ascendance Of Algorithmic Tyranny 

[Nomea, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]

A.I. Is Starting to Wear Down Democracy

[New York Times, via The Big Picture June 29, 2025]

Content generated by artificial intelligence has become a factor in elections around the world. Most of it is bad, misleading voters and discrediting the democratic process. Artificial intelligence has long threatened to transform elections around the world. Now there is evidence from at least 50 countries that it already has.

Make Fun Of Them 

Ed Zitron [via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]

Has an AI Backlash Begun? 

[Wired, via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]

Markets, Bureaucracy, Democracy, … AI? What large models share with the systems that make society run

Henry Farrell, Jun 30, 2025

Botshit Gone Wild 

Gary Marcus, via Naked Capitalism 07-05-2025]

Climate and environmental crises

The electrification imperative — How a switch from burning fossil fuels to using electricity can unlock the full value of the energy transition

[Ember Energy, via Naked Capitalism 06-30-2025]

Earth is Trapping Much More Heat Than Climate Models Forecast 

[The Conversation, via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]

Arctic Sea Ice reaches a Historic Low for late June, with Winter Impacts expected if the Weather Pattern persists 

[Severe Weather, via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]

Droughts worldwide pushing tens of millions towards starvation, says report 

[Guardian, via Naked Capitalism 07-05-2025]

Democrats’ political malpractice

Will Democrats Learn from the Establishment’s Loss? The David Hogg affair, Zohran Mamdani’s win, and the future of the Democratic coalition.

David Austin Walsh, June 26, 2025 [Boston Review]

…Part of the problem for Democrats is that there is little consensus about what exactly the party stands for in concrete policy terms beyond unconditional support for Israel, some attention to climate change, and vaguely defined commitments to racial, gender, and sexuality equity (never mind the establishment’s backing of Cuomo after his resignation following sexual harassment allegations)….

Another key factor behind the implosion of the Democratic establishment is that it once again proved incapable of accommodating major internal reform. Twenty-five-year-old liberal activist David Hogg, elected as one of five vice-chairs of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in February, said he would not run again after a vote to hold new vice-chair elections passed with an overwhelming majority earlier this month on nominally procedural grounds….

…Democrats have long struggled with a gerontocracy problem: even with the recent elevation of younger leaders like Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries—fifty-four years old—the average age of Democratic leadership in the House remains seventy-two. (The average for GOP leadership, by contrast, is forty-eight.) ….

what philosopher Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò has called “deference politics.”

Elite deference politics breeds elite political entitlement, often defended by explicit appeals to identity. This was a strong part of the rationale for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential bid—it was Clinton’s turn after Obama to be president, the line went—and it animated the fury of so many Clinton stalwarts at Sanders’s candidacy. The left’s antipathy for Clinton was dismissed first as the misogyny of the so-called “Bernie Bros” and then as racism, a refusal to listen to Black voters in the primaries. Later, in 2020, concerns about Biden’s age and fitness for the presidency were brushed aside—even by people who raised similar concerns about Sanders—again on the grounds of ageism. The point is that centrist bloviating about “The Groups” misses the most consequential case of elite deference politics. The form practiced by the party establishment itself is vastly more responsible for the party’s plight in 2025 than environmental and racial justice nonprofits….

The Elephant in the Room — Reintermediation is the only path forward for Democrats

[Policy Tensor, via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]

…Start with the abundance agenda. Its focus is on improving government’s capacity to solve problems (like building more housing or infrastructure faster). That’s undeniably important – effective governance is a public good. However, ask: Who is advocating the abundance agenda, and to whom is it being pitched? Largely, it’s an elite discourse (journalists, think-tankers, some politicians) trying to convince other politically attentive elites that we should loosen regulations and invest in growth. The people most alienated from the Democratic Party – say, a non-college homeowner in a deindustrialized Midwestern town – are not part of this conversation, except perhaps as skeptical onlookers. In fact, some of those voters might hear “deregulate zoning and environmental rules” and think: that sounds like helping developers, not me. The messaging of abundance could easily be co-opted by the GOP (“Democrats want to sidestep environmental protections to ram through solar farms and apartments in your suburban neighborhood”). Without an underlying trust and relationship with communities, a pro-growth agenda might breed backlash rather than enthusiasm….

Ultimately, all three strategies operate within the existing paradigm of a mostly top-down party trying to persuade voters periodically. They tweak what the party says or does from the top, but not how the party connects with people at the ground level. None of them directly tackles the party’s structural legitimacy problem. Indeed, it’s telling that these debates are largely internal to elite circles – evidence of the very gap we’ve highlighted. As Waleed Shahid observed, Democrats have become “trapped in an increasingly bitter internal fight” between camps (populists vs. abundance advocates) instead of uniting to face outward challenges. And that fight is not purely ideological; it’s powered by insider interests (big donors and party operatives) who find the “abundance” framework a convenient way to dismiss the populist left’s critiques of corporate power….

[TW: does not address the issue of how political economy was reorganized over the past half century to favor capital at the expense of labor. The real elephant in the room is that with the Supreme Court having decriminalized corruption (see The Lever’s podcast series The Master Plan), political elites are bought to do what the rich want.

[What must be restored is the historical understanding that the rich have always posed a threat to republican self-government because of their insatiable desire for more wealth and more power. As some scholars of the founding period have observed, one of the great tragedies of USA history is the supplanting of civic republicanism by economic liberalism.  No one should be elevated to public office who do not see the rich as competitors for power, to be kept under control. Thomas Paine argued for a wealth tax as a means of ensuring freedom from oligarchy.]

On Zohran Mamdani and Taxi Drivers 

Zephyr Teachout [via Naked Capitalism 07-03-2025]

Unable to Reinvent Itself, Dems Can’t Capitalize on Trump’s Missteps.

Jon Jeter’s Black Agenda Report

“The DNC,” he wrote, “owes its stasis to the internecine feud that came to a head with Kamala Harris’ loss to Trump in last year’s general election and which spilled over into the New Year. That split pits party stalwarts against younger progressives who want Democrats to break from the conservative tradition established by Bill Clinton in his 1992 presidential campaign in a misguided effort to ‘out-Republican the Republicans.’”

The party’s disunion is the culmination of  Bill Clinton’s strategy to compete with Ronald Reagan’s GOP for the votes of white, suburban racists by effectively being more conservative. Covering the tune, “Anything You Can Do I Can Do Better,” Clinton razed the Wall Street regulations that Reagan only loosened. When Reagan left the White House, the number of conglomerates controlling the bulk of U.S. media outlets had been whittled from 50 to 29; by the time Clinton left office, the number was six. And while Reagan talked a good game about lifting trade barriers, the U.S. tariff regime was largely intact when he left office; the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) signed into law by Clinton opened the floodgates for employers to ship the nation’s manufacturing sector offshore.

It was, however, Clinton’s 1994 crime bill that was the focus of intense scrutiny in the 2020 U.S. presidential season, and rightly so. The Reagan and Bush administrations nearly doubled the nation’s federal prison population yet Clinton jailed more inmates in eight years than the Reagan and Bush administrations did in 12.

The Democratic Party is Its Voters And They’re Doing Just Fine
­Josh Marshall, June 30, 2025 [Talking Points Memo]

As it happens, I hadn’t known this primary was being held last weekend. (No excuses, just so much else going on and it was run as a so-called “firehouse primary” on an expedited basis.) The first I heard about it was from a handful of TPM Readers who wrote in to tell me about the surprising levels of energy and turnout they’d seen when they showed up to vote. This contrast caught my attention because it’s one that keeps showing up, paradoxically unremarked upon in almost all the election coverage we see.

On the one hand, the Democratic Party is “floundering,” “directionless,” “lost.” It’s approval numbers are bleak. And then, often in the same articles, you have all this evidence of voter intensity. Turnout. New activism. Lots of new people running for office. What seems like an apparent contradiction resolves itself if you get your terms right. I don’t think the Democratic Party is in a tailspin or floundering at all. In many cases, the elected leadership of the party is. But the elected leadership is not the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is its voters. Especially it’s primary voters….

Trump’s transactional regime

Trump’s Finances Were Shaky. Then He Began to Capitalize on His Comeback.

Russ Buettner, July 2, 2025 [New York Times]

Contrary to the president’s assertions, records filed in a fraud case against him suggest that his riches were not the product of a steady and strong empire.

Last spring, even as Donald J. Trump’s march back toward the White House dominated public attention, his finances, largely out of view, faced serious threats.
His office building in Lower Manhattan generated too little cash to cover its mortgage, with the balance coming due. Many of his golf courses regularly lacked enough players to cover costs. The flow of millions of dollars a year from his stint as a television celebrity had mostly dried up.
And a sudden wave of legal judgments threatened to devour all his cash.
Then, with his clinching of the Republican nomination, everything began to change….
Most glaringly, Mr. Trump is now both a partner in several crypto ventures and, as president, crypto’s chief policy regulator, and he has signaled that he wants his administration to have a hands-off approach to digital currencies.
Today, those moves are seen by Mr. Trump’s detractors as a money grab of historic proportions. But an analysis by The New York Times of thousands of pages of internal Trump Organization documents filed in one of the legal actions against him suggests a more urgent motivation for Mr. Trump’s behavior: a need, rather than simply a desire, for easy money to keep his empire intact….

Resistance

Trained Volunteers Patrol L.A. Streets as ICE Raids Intensify: Neighborhood groups monitor immigration enforcement amid rising fear and federal scrutiny.

Myriam-Fernanda Alcala Delgado July 3, 2025 [The American Prospect]

The Most Overlooked Value of Political Protest: Protests show people they are not alone in caring about an issue.

Betsy Levy Paluck, July 1, 2025 [The Atlantic]

Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

The Know Nothings Never Left— They Just Rebranded as MAGA… The Klansmen In Khakis

Howie Klein, July 03, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

Mica Soellner reported that racists and xenophobes like Chip Roy (R-TX), Brandon Gill (R-TX) and Gym Jordan (R-OH) are on the warpath. “In the wake of Zohran Mamdani’s stunning win in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary, Hill Republicans are pondering a new issue— restricting legal immigration. Several conservatives have used Mamdani’s primary victory to argue that mass immigration is causing damaging cultural change, pointing to the 33-year-old’s political rise as an example. Mamdani, a Democratic socialist, was born in Uganda. Mamdani would become the first Muslim and Indian mayor of New York City if he wins the general election in November. ‘We have fifty-one-and-a-half million foreign born people in this country,’ Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) told us. ‘You clamp down on illegal immigration, which is what the president is doing, but you need to limit, slash and refocus legal immigration… legal immigration is part of the problem.’”

“Bipartisanship” Should Be An Epithet

Patrick Toomey, July 05, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

…The GOP, as a party, gleefully threw dirt on the graves of the New Deal, the Fair Deal, and the Great Society. It wasn’t the handiwork of 1 overfed, oversexed, and undereducated front man. It was fathered and nurtured by party stalwarts like Grover Norquist and Mitch McConnell.

Cutting social spending for the poor and middle class, cutting taxes for the top 1%, and running up huge deficits in the process have been essential elements of the GOP playbook since halcyon days of St. Ron the Forgetful. Let’s remember what then-OMB Director David Stockman said of the 1981 Reagan-era upper-bracket tax cutting orgy. Do you realize the greed that came to the forefront? The hogs were really feeding. The greed level, the level of opportunism, just got out of control. 
Stockman summarized the GOP template for 45 years and counting now….

Howie Klein, July 01, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]
Gregory S. Schneider, June 30, 2025 [Washington Post]
What started as an effort to promote racial unity in Edenton by reconsidering its most prominent downtown symbol has done the opposite….
The tone from the White House gives an extra sense of empowerment to those who have come out to defend the Edenton monument every weekend for the past three years. On a recent sunny Saturday, Ron Toppin, 80, and two helpers set up a canopy over tables neatly lined with trays of Confederate information sheets and hit the sidewalk two hours before their opponents arrived.
Trump’s election “made the country a whole lot better,” said Toppin, whose late wife used to organize the informational materials for the group and who said his great-great-grandfather was a rebel soldier captured by the Union in 1863. “We’ve got America back.”
Mike Dean, commander of the Edenton Bell Battery of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, roared up on his Harley — dubbed “Traveller” after Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee’s horse — and took command of the outpost. When a few protesters began marching up the sidewalk, Dean gestured to a woman walking by with a sign that read “Remove this statue.”
“Understand,” Dean said, “these are Marxists. Marxists want to destroy history.”

John Ganz, July 1, 2025 [Unpopular Front]

The essence of Trump’s movement is an attack on the very concept of American citizenship. It’s the bright, red thread that runs through the entirety of its existence: from its origin in birtherism, the racist idea that there was something questionable or tainted about Barack Obama’s citizenship, to the stolen election myth, which sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans, to the attempt to end birthright citizenship by fiat through executive order, and the newly announced prioritization of denaturalization cases by the Department of Justice. A Republican congressman called for New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s denaturalization and deportation. The White House said it should be “investigated.” This is not to be taken lightly.

I say it is an attack on the concept of citizenship, not a redefinition or even a return to the pre-Reconstruction racial state, because, in the Trumpian universe, there is no agreed-upon, apolitical definition of who is granted citizenship, of who bears inalienable rights under the law. The sovereign decides who is a citizen, as it decides who is an enemy and where and when the law applies. It becomes entirely arbitrary, a prerogative grant….

It’s long been my contention that the attack on citizenship is the most serious and frightful aspect of the Trump phenomenon and the one that makes it most deserving of the epithet fascist or totalitarian. “MAGA,” in its innermost being, means “death to America.” If they successfully destroy American citizenship as enshrined in the Constitution they will have destroyed the country… It will be a chaotic and shambolic existence where more and more people have to scramble to ensure they have the right papers or are in the right zone.

The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

The Democracy Index

Joshua Kolb, Lily Conway, and Joyce Vance, July 1, 2025

Last week ended with the legal fireworks lawyers wait for every year: the bundle of Supreme Court decisions released at the end of June before the justices take their summer break. A total of nine opinions were released on Thursday and Friday, and while all the rulings were significant, there were four particularly notable decisions that will have significant nationwide repercussions and tell us where the court (and therefore the country) is headed.

​​​​​​​

The Necessity of Birthright Citizenship for Black People 

Margaret Kimberley, Ju[y 2, 2025 [Black Agenda Report]

I’m just saying if we had the legal right to do it, I would do it in a heartbeat. I don’t know if we do or not, we’re looking at that right now.” – Donald Trump on sending U.S. citizens convicted of crimes out of the country….

…The 14th Amendment did undo the 1857 Dred Scott decision, which deprived all Black people of citizenship. But Black people must always be wary and think ahead, as our enemies may be doing. Once any changes to the understanding of birthright citizenship are made, there is a possibility of persons, particularly from marginalized groups, becoming stateless. There are people who don’t have ready access to birth certificates, or in the case of a Black woman in Texas who has a birth certificate listing her name only as “Girl” and who, as a result, cannot obtain a Social Security card or prove her citizenship. No one knows how many other people find themselves in such situations….

 

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 29, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 29, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

Remembering Bill Moyers: A Colossus of Journalism and Public Service

Jonathan Alter, June 28, 2025 [Washington Monthly]

‘We Have Lost a Giant’: Broadcast Legend Bill Moyers Dies at 91

Jessica Corbett, June 26, 2025 [CommonDreams]

Free Press Mourns Bill Moyers

[Free Press, June 26 2025, via CommonDreams]

The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

Amy Coney Barrett and the Supreme Court Give Birth to a Disaster

Garrett Epps, June 27, 2025 [Washington Monthly]

…Three federal district courts concluded that the birthright citizenship order is almost certainly unconstitutional and barred the executive branch from enforcing it pending a final decision. The issue seemed headed to the Supreme Court, where it would be decided in the normal course of American law.

The administration, however, did an end run around that process. It filed an application with the Supreme Court that denied any interest in the issue of the order’s constitutionality. Instead, it said, it wanted the Court to look at whether district courts can tell the president he can’t do something he wants to do—to issue “universal injunctions” barring the government from, for example, stripping citizenship from any baby until the constitutionality of the order can be settled. The two things, the government suggested, have nothing to do with each other….

The Supreme Court Just Gave Trump Three Victories in One Ruling

Matt Ford, June 27, 2025 [The New Republic]

The Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday in Trump v. CASA is a disastrous moment for the American constitutional order. In a 6–3 decision, the court’s conservative justices curbed the judiciary’s power to prevent the executive branch from carrying out blatantly unconstitutional policies and orders.

The court effectively granted Trump three major victories in one stroke. First, the ruling severely narrowed federal judges’ power to temporarily halt the Trump administration’s actions in general, freeing the president from a major constraint on his policy agenda.

In response to lawsuits, lower courts had often issued what are known as “nationwide injunctions,” which blocked the executive branch from enacting a new policy while litigation continued in court. Those injunctions typically applied beyond the plaintiffs in a particular case. But Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the court, held that courts had acted unlawfully by granting relief to anyone beyond the plaintiffs themselves….

The Real Judicial Coup: How the Supreme Court Just Redefined Presidential Authority

Mike Brock, June 27, 2025 [Notes From The Circus]

…Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, has created what amounts to a doctrine of presumptive executive constitutionality. The Court ruled that when a president issues an order that appears to violate the Constitution, courts must assume the president is correct until proven wrong—not once, but individually, circuit by circuit, plaintiff by plaintiff.

Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means: the Supreme Court has ruled that birthright citizenship—guaranteed by the plain text of the 14th Amendment—can be suspended nationwide based solely on a president’s claim of authority, and anyone who wants their constitutional rights restored must file individual lawsuits seeking individual relief.

This isn’t judicial restraint. This is a fundamental rewriting of how constitutional rights work in America….

This represents a systematic advantage for executive power over constitutional constraint through procedural manipulation. It’s not that rights disappear—it’s that protecting them becomes exponentially more difficult and expensive….

“No Right Is Safe”: SCOTUS Bars Judges From Reining in Trump

Shawn Musgrave, June 27 2025 [The Intercept]

The Supreme Court halted courts from issuing national injunctions, forcing “judges to shrug and turn their backs to intermittent lawlessness.”

By Limiting Nationwide Injunctions, Supreme Court Declares ‘Open Season on All Our Rights’

Jessica Corbett, June 27, 2025 [CommonDreams]

In a ruling that stems from the president’s birthright citizenship order, the “conservative supermajority just took away lower courts’ single most powerful tool for reining in the Trump administration’s lawless excesses.”

It’s Not Just a Constitutional Crisis in the Trump Era. It’s Constitutional Failure

Jack Rakove, June 27, 2025

[TW: Rakove is a leading scholar of the creation of the American republic. His 1996 book Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution dismantled many of the claims of the Constitutional originalism of conservatives, and was awarded the 1997 Pulitzer Prize for History.]

…Our ongoing constitutional crisis began with the presidential election last November 5. Reelecting an individual culpable for January 6 who has twice made a mockery of the presidential oath of office is itself a constitutional crisis. Nothing in his past or current behavior suggests that Trump has ever felt fidelity to his constitutional duties.

Once a constitutional crisis becomes an endemic condition, the term no longer usefully describes our collapsing system. Instead, we live in an era of constitutional failure when the relevant institutions cannot fulfill their responsibilities….

…When audiences at constituent meetings repeatedly shout, “Do your jobs,” they have a better grasp of Congress’s responsibility than their feckless representatives….

In the face of this congressional passivity, what path of constitutional repair is left open? Unsurprisingly, the best answer remains the courts. Although it has taken time to respond to the turmoil Trump has unleashed, the judiciary’s actions have been encouraging. Remarkably, the difference between Republican and Democratic-appointed judges has been slight, suggesting that judicial independence enshrined in Article III may be fulfilled amid this grave situation.

Yet, with the current Supreme Court, one cannot be too confident. Why? Its responses to the two 2024 critical election cases remain deeply troubling to anyone who takes the injunctions of the Constitution seriously.  The Court handled one case with striking expedition. But it manifestly stalled the other with a run-out-the-clock set of procedural delays that deprived voters of findings they were entitled to possess before November 5. The decisions in Trump v. Anderson (which involved the application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to Trump’s eligibility to appear on the Colorado primary ballot) and Trump v. U.S. (the presidential immunity case) should sit atop any hit list of constitutional failures….

…The second condition seems more surprising. It is the stunning inadequacy of the majority’s understanding of constitutional history and core concepts of American constitutionalism….

In our fractious polity, fresh insults to constitutional norms and settled practices of governance occur daily. That is why the phrase constitutional crisis no longer describes our situation. The Constitution has failed, and we no longer know which institution will rescue it.

Sotomayor joined by Jackson, Kagan on fiery birthright citizenship dissent 

[The Hill, via Naked Capitalism 06-28-2025]

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

Trump’s ICE Agents Are Arresting US Citizens. GOP Budget Would Hire 10,000 More. 

[Truthout, via Naked Capitalism 06-24-2025]

Trump’s secret police are terrorizing American streets: The altercations are growing more tense — especially in Los Angeles.

Justin Glawe, June 27, 2025 [Public Notice]

Militarized LA: troops here to stay as Trump doubles down on deployments 

[The Guardian, via Naked Capitalism 06-24-2025]

Justice Dept. whistleblower details senior officials’ efforts to stonewall judges, ignore decisions 

[CBS News, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]

How To Talk To Your Senators About Emil Bove

Joyce Vance, June 25, 2025 [Civil Discourse]

Meet the D.C. Bigwigs Literally Profiting Off Trump’s Deportations 

[The Bulwark, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]

 

Strategic Political Economy

Solving America’s Chip Manufacturing Crisis

Kenneth Flamm and William B. Bonvillian

American Affairs Volume IX, Number 2 (Summer 2025): 41–68.

[TW: Flamm documented the origins of the U.S. computer industry in his 1998 book, Creating the Computer: government, industry, and high technology, published by the Brookings Institution and available in full online. This book should be required reading for all courses of study in economics and American history because it devastates the myth of “entrepreneurial free enterprise” by showing how it was carefully created and targeted U.S. government programs and funding which allowed the risky new technologies required for computers to reach commercial success and create an entire, new industry. This new article is long and brimming with technical industrial information very few people have mastered, making it an extremely important and informative read. ]

…Economies of scale are the fundamental economic force reshaping industrial structure in leading-edge chip fabrication. For context, note that at the peak of its market power in the global computer processor (CPU) market in the third quarter of 2014, Intel alone produced a record 100 million x86 processors (x86 is Intel’s famous foundational architecture and instruction set for computer processors), implying an annual Intel production rate of somewhere between 300 and 400 million processors….

Intel’s current problems are in part linked to the relentless increase in fabrication equipment costs at every new technology node as well as to the increasing volume of production needed to reach minimum efficient scale at the new nodes. In 2014, Intel’s dominant market position gave it massive volume that was produced at multiple Intel fabs (using the “copy exactly” strategy Intel invented in the 1980s). But by 2023, Intel’s annual x86 processor volumes appear to have dropped 30–50 percent, to 190–230 million sold annually….

…in the early 2000s, Intel began to stray from the vision of its legendary early leaders Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore, and Andy Grove, who focused on fielding the most technically advanced, complex, and capable products on the market.… The connection to Intel’s current woes is that the first decade of the twenty-first century was a distracting one for Intel management. The firm’s resources and managerial attention were diverted into sales and marketing initiatives aimed at defending an entrenched position of market power. The company had lost its singular focus on technical innovation that had been its hallmark under Noyce, Moore, and Grove’s early vision for Intel….

Intel Foundry is not really a case of “too big to fail”; it is a case of “too intertwined with national security to fail.” There are no other U.S. company alternatives to Intel Foundry: the capital costs of entering advanced chip manufacturing, R&D, and production are staggering, the technology challenges and risks are massive, and all of Intel’s former U.S. competitors have by now exited advanced chipmaking. The national security imperative requires that the U.S. government backstop Intel Foundry,…

In addition to the task of supporting Intel Foundry’s commercial success, there is a longer-term financing task.58 The chips Act is a stop­gap measure. It assures some production in the United States of the pending generation of advanced chip processes, but not the following generations of chips.59 It was a onetime law with the authorization running out, as noted, in 2027; and the funding for new fab construction is already committed. The U.S. semiconductor challenge is a long-term one, and CHIPS was an important but decidedly short-term fix….

…Because the federal government refused to engage in a subsidy competition to finance the massive costs of new semiconductor fabs, no new leading-edge logic fabs had been built in the United States for over a decade, and no new leading-edge memory fabs for roughly two decades, before the chips Act.80 Congress passed the chips Act in recognition of this major security vulnerability.

But the chips Act is only authorized for five years, expiring in 2027, and it is not at all clear that it will be renewed….

Congress Is Pushing for a Medicaid Work Requirement. Here’s What Happened When Georgia Tried It. 

[ProPublica, via Naked Capitalism 06-27-2025]

…Georgia, the only state with a Medicaid work mandate, started experimenting with the requirement on July 1, 2023. As the Medicaid program’s two-year anniversary approaches, Georgia has enrolled just a fraction of those eligible, a result health policy researchers largely attribute to bureaucratic hurdles in the state’s work verification system. As of May 2025, approximately 7,500 of the nearly 250,000 eligible Georgians were enrolled, even though state statistics show 64% of that group is working.

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 22, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 22, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

War

[TW: This is what the “globalist” elites centered on the City of London and Wall Street have been scheming for ever since Franklin Roosevelt told Winston Churchill at the 1943 Casablanca Conference that there would be no restoration of the British empire.

[Now that Trump has fully thrown in with the pro-war faction, we will learn if those who supported Trump because they believed Trump would be a foil against the “globalist” elites, accept the chastening of a hard lesson learned. More importantly, now that Trump has allowed the globalists to steer us into a war against Iran, will those who supported Trump be vigilant against Trump using the war to exercise his “war powers” and impose authoritarian measures on the USA population? What will they do if Trump responds to protests against this new war by declaring martial law?

[Building opposition to Trump and a newly energized militarized security state will be difficult and increasingly dangerous. One source of hope is to remember that while Trump and the security state consolidate police state rule in USA, reality continues. The massive misuse of citizens’ lives and national treasures will occur while climate change imposes rapidly escalating costs on “business as usual.” [See The $1 Trillion Climate Problem​ Republicans Are Ignoring, Kate Aronoff, June 19, 2025, in The New Republic] As entire regions are forced to cope with weather risks without any insurance and entire cities struggle to obtain enough water, there will come a time when reality can no longer be ignored. Reality itself will compel the restoration of systems of governance that protect and nurture all human lives, and the General Welfare of all citizens, and justice for all. ]

 

Clash of Civilizations

[Wikipedia]

Kit Klarenberg, June 18, 2025

Trump official to The Grayzone: CIA’s Ratcliffe acts as ‘Mossad stenographer’ on Iran

Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil, June 21, 2025 [The Grayzone]

A Trump official tells The Grayzone that Israel’s Mossad is using CIA Director John Ratcliffe and US CENTCOM’s Gen. Michael Kurilla to influence Trump with cooked intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program. Inside the White House, dissenters have been isolated, setting the stage for a regime change war that could cost American lives.

 

War With Iran 

Craig Murray, June 20, 2025

For 18 years, the Iranian nuclear programme has been one of the top 10 targeting objectives of the US intelligence services….

It is worth noting – and a prime example of how the neoliberal world works – that the next head of MI6, Sir John Sawers, is now an executive of British Petroleum. That company controlled Iran for decades, installed the fake Pahlavi “Shah” in 1921 and engineered and financed the coup that ended democracy in Iran in 1953. The appalling dictatorship of the Shah after that led directly to the theocratic revolution.

BP desperately want Iran’s oil back, so ex MI6 Head Sawers has been all over the airwaves advocating war on Iran. Meanwhile it is not an accident that two days ago, a new Head of MI6 was chosen and installed. Starmer has found his Dearlove.

The appointment was made by David Lammy. Blaise Metreweli was chosen ahead of more obvious candidates, who had served longer in MI6, had more operational experience, and were better analysts or better managers. However Metreweli – who spent much of her career in the Middle East – is a fanatical Zionist. She worked closely with Israel on technologies for surveillance and assassination….

 

Iran halts 20% of global oil flow with Strait of Hormuz shutdown after U.S. strikes

 

The AI That Triggered a War: How Palantir and the IAEA Fueled Israel’s Strike on Iran

Sarah B., June 19, 2025 [DD Geo-politics, via Alastair Crooke]

Since 2015, the IAEA has relied on Palantir’s Mosaic platform, a $50-million AI system that sifts 400 million data points—satellite imagery, social media, personnel logs—to predict nuclear threats. On June 12, Iran leaked documents it claimed showed IAEA chief Rafael Grossi shared Mosaic outputs with Israel, effectively turning the agency into a “tool for aggression.” The charge echoes a pattern: prior to 2025, Mosaic data helped shape sanctions and even UN aid decisions despite risks of bias.

Palantir, co-founded by Trump ally Peter Thiel, powers IDF targeting in Gaza and Ukraine’s battlefield AI. Its IAEA role, meant to ensure compliance, now teeters toward militarization. As Iran halts monitoring and threatens to expose Israel’s nuclear secrets at Soreq, the stakes are apocalyptic. This investigation asks how Mosaic became a war pretext, why Israel needed a cover story, and whether privatized AI now threatens global peace.

 

Friday Video Tsunami… It’s All About Israel, Iran and Trump

Larry Johnson, 20 June 2025 [Sonar 21]

From my contacts within the US military, all signs indicate that we’re on-the-luge (a fast snow sled) at this point and there’s no way to get off. We are hurtling downhill… too much is already in motion. Even if Trump decides tomorrow to call everything off, we’ve already set up and committed enough support assets so that the Israeli Defense Force has everything it needs. Reversing course seems very unlikely now because of bureaucratic momentum.

 

Trump Reportedly Greenlights Plan for US Attack on Iran Without Congressional Approval

Yves Smith, June 19, 2025 [Naked Capitalism]
Jim Stewartson, June 17, 2025 [MindWar]

WHAT I HAVE BEEN TOLD IS COMING IN IRAN

Seymour Hersh, June 19, 2025 [www.defenddemocracy.press/]

This is a report on what is most likely to happen in Iran, as early as this weekend, according to Israeli insiders and American officials I’ve relied upon for decades. It will entail heavy American bombing. I have vetted this report with a longtime US official in Washington, who told me that all will be “under control” if Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei “departs.” Just how that might happen, short of his assassination, is not known. There has been a great deal of talk about American firepower and targets inside Iran, but little practical thinking, as far I can tell, about how to remove a revered religious leader with an enormous following.

I have reported from afar on the nuclear and foreign policy of Israel for decades. My 1991 book The Samson Option told the story of the making of the Israeli nuclear bomb and America’s willingness to keep the project secret. The most important unanswered question about the current situation will be the response of the world, including that of Vladimir Putin, the Russian president who has been an ally of Iran’s leaders….

Jake Johnson, June 20, 2025 [CommonDreams]
[Military Watch, via Naked Capitalism 06-19-2025]
[The Intercept, via Naked Capitalism 06-20-2025]
[Intercept, via Naked Capitalism 06-21-2025]

Trump must help Israel finish the job to dismantle Khamenei’s regime – editorial 

[Jerusalem Postv, via Naked Capitalism 06-19-2025]

[Conor Gallagher: Provides a blueprint for regime change, in case there were any doubts, including:]

Forge a Middle East coalition for Iran’s partition. Encourage long-term plans for a federalized or partitioned Iran, recognizing that Khamenei’s theocratic regime cannot be reformed. Offer security guarantees to Sunni, Kurdish, and Balochi minority regions willing to break away.

Glenn Diesen [via Naked Capitalism 06-20-2025]
“The only path forward now is reckless escalation.”

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: From Perpetual Peace to World War 

Glenn Diesen, via Naked Capitalism 06-17-2025]

[Yves Smith: “Trust me, you must listen starting at 39:00.”]

 

True Promise 3: Iran Responds With Long-Awaited Hypersonic Retaliation 

[Simplicius, via Naked Capitalism 06-15-2025]

 

Israel Buckles as Iran War Shifts to New Drag-Out Phase 

[Simplicius, via Naked Capitalism 06-21-2025]

 

“behavioral signature of a missile defense interceptor entering logic collapse”

[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 06-18-2025]

 

Iran Shoots Down Third F-35 Fighter, Captures Second Pilot: What Are the Implications?

[Military Watch Magazine, June-14th-2025]

Israel is running out of interceptor missiles. China’s export bans mean they can’t be replaced 

Kevin Walmsley [via Naked Capitalism 06-21-2025]

Gaza / Palestine / Israel

Israel’s attack on Iran: The violent new world being born is going to horrify you

Jonathan Cook, June 19, 2025

…With the Palestinians feeling increasingly isolated, choked by Israel’s siege and abandoned by the Arab regimes, Hamas staged a show of force, breaking out for one day from the concentration camp of Gaza.

Israel seized the opportunity to complete two related tasks: destroying the Palestinians as a people once and for all, and with it their ambitions for a state in their homeland; and rolling back the Shia crescent, just as the Pentagon had planned more than 20 years earlier.

Israel started by levelling Gaza – slaughtering and starving its people. Then it moved to destroy Hezbollah’s southern heartlands in Lebanon. And with the collapse of the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad, Israel was able to occupy parts of Syria, smash what remained of its military infastructure, and clear a flight path to Iran.

These were the preconditions for launching the current war of aggression on Iran…..

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 15, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 15, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

 

 

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

 

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

 

Why is Kristi Noem’s bone-chilling pledge of a “regime change” in Calif not getting media coverage?!  Trump wants to remove Democrats from office

Dean Obeidallah, June 13, 2025

But what has been largely ignored in the reporting was the bone-chilling comment that sparked Padilla to interrupt Noem during her press conference. In prepared remarks, Noem delivered a message from Trump that the military occupation of Los Angeles and beyond will not end until both Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass are removed from office.

I’m not exaggerating. In language that echoes justifications for war, Noem began her speech by talking about federal forces, the state National Guard Trump and US Marines being deployed in California. That is when she stated: “We are not going away,” adding, “We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.”

Liberate the city from the socialist leadership!” No longer is the Trump regime planning to have the troops remain in California to occupy parts of the city until calm can be restored. Nor until arrests are made of undocumented immigrants who have criminal records, etc.

No, the new condition for ending the military occupation is regime change. As Noem told us point blank: the troops will remain until Trump can “liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor.” To Trump, if he labels an elected official a “socialist,” they should be removed from office. (And we know the MAGA base would cheer it and Fox News would defend it.)….

Backing this up was the ominous threat by Trump’s Attorney General Pam Bondi who Wednesday threatened even more action to take control of California. Bondi told reporters that she fully backed “bringing in the National Guard” and “bringing in the Marine…to protect our federal buildings, to protect highways, to protect the citizens.”

AG Bondi then alarmingly added, “We’re not scared to go further. We’re not frightened to do something else if we need to.”

What is go further then deploying warfighters of the US Marine corps on the streets of the United States?! The answer is keeping them there until Newsom and Bass either surrender to Trump or are removed.

I know this may sound outrageous. But again, Noem was delivering the Trump regime message that the troops are staying until the city is “liberated” from Newsom and Bass. Ignore that threat at your peril.

 

Judge Breyer’s Decision About Trump & The National Guard

Joyce Vance, June 13, 2025

 

Trump endorses arrest of Gavin Newsom 

[KTLA, via Naked Capitalism 06-11-2025]

 

Heather Cox Richardson, June 12, 2025

The assault on Padilla comes days after the Department of Justice under Trump indicted Representative LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) on federal charges saying she impeded immigration officers outside a New Jersey detention center.

While Democratic senators and representatives are outraged, they are having little success getting their Republican colleagues to join them. House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) suggested that Padilla had charged Noem—the videos show no such thing—and suggested the Senate should censure Padilla for “wildly inappropriate” behavior.

While much focus has been on the assault itself, what Noem was saying before Padilla spoke out is crucially important. “We are not going away,” she said. “We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.”

In other words, the Trump administration is vowing to get rid of the democratically elected government of California by using military force. That threat is the definition of a coup. It suggests MAGA considers any political victory but their own to be illegitimate and considers themselves justified in removing those governmental officials with violence: a continuation of the attempt of January 6, 2021, to overturn the results of a presidential election.

 

The McIver Indictment Explained

Joyce Vance, June 12, 2025

US troops make first detentions in Trump border military zones 

[Reuters, via Naked Capitalism 06-10-2025]

 

‘A complete sea change’: Trump’s immigration crackdown goes into hyperdrive 

[Politico, via Naked Capitalism 06-08-2025]

 

You’re a Bunch of Cowards!

Hamilton Nolan, June 10, 2025 [How Things Work]

…The Wall Street Journal reported on a meeting last month where Stephen Miller summoned ICE’s leadership to a meeting where he demanded that federal agents lower their standards and “just go out there and arrest illegal aliens,” outside of 7-11 or wherever. “‘Who here thinks they can do it?’ Miller said, asking for a show of hands.” The outcome of that demand can be seen in the ongoing terrorization of immigrants happening across the country.

Now, Stephen Miller is a little rat-faced Nazi bitch. Since his youth just about everyone around him has despised him because he has always been a miserable racist little shit whose evil heart is manifested in his detestable rodent-like visage. Knowing that, I like to imagine all those big, bad, ICE agents, manly men, so macho, shifting uncomfortably around a conference room table as they are harangued by that psychotic little bureaucrat, and then rushing out to kidnap working men from a Home Depot parking lot in order to demonstrate to their master, Stephen Bitch Ass Miller, how good they are at being America’s new gestapo.

“Oh, Mister Miller, sir! I put on 40 pounds of tactical gear and tackled a 55-year-old partially disabled day laborer! I prevented him from doing some drywall work and feeding his family, for you, sir! I yearn for your approval!”….

 

Funding The War on Yourselves

Josh Marshall, June 11, 2025 [Talking Points Memo]

Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he will begin “winding down” FEMA after this year’s Hurricane season and, perhaps the more significant statement, that he will begin distributing disaster aid directly from the President’s office. In other words, disaster assistance will be the President’s personal gift, an assist for friends and those who display loyalty. It’s part of the broader pattern we can see across the horizon: Trump takes the policing and military powers of the United States and the national tax revenues (drawn disproportionately from the blue states) and uses it to make war on states he considers enemies.

This has always been the centerpiece of Trumpism even more than authoritarianism, a kind of fiscal warlordism. Disaster relief dollars are a relatively minor expenditure. But we see it aimed at universities, the cut off of funds generally to California and the forced deployment of National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles. The blue states essentially fund the war against themselves.

 

American Concentration Camps

Chris Hedges and Eunice Wong, June 10, 2025

Our offshore concentration camps, for now, are in El Salvador and Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. But don’t expect them to remain there. Once they are normalized, not only for U.S.-deported immigrants and residents, but U.S. citizens, they will migrate to the homeland. It is a very short leap from our prisons, already rife with abuse and mistreatment, to concentration camps, where those held are cut off from the outside world — “disappeared” — denied legal representation and crammed into fetid, overcrowded cells.

Prisoners in the camps in El Salvador are forced to sleep on the floor or in solitary confinement in the dark. Many suffer from tuberculosis, fungal infections, scabies, severe malnutrition and chronic digestive illnesses. The inmates, including over 3,000 children, are fed rancid food. They endure beatings. They are tortured, including by water-boarding or being forced naked into barrels of ice-cold water, according to Human Rights Watch. In 2023, the State Department described imprisonment as “life-threatening,” and that was before the Salvadoran government declared a “state of exception” in March 2022. The situation has been greatly “exacerbated,” the State Department notes, by the “addition of 72,000 detainees under the state of exception.” Some 375 people have died in the camps since the state of exception was established, part of El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele’s “war on gangs,” according to the local human rights group Socorro Jurídico Humanitario….

 

There’s no wrong way to protest fascism: The conversation around the invasion of LA gets it wrong

Jordan Zakarin, June 10, 2025

…Kristi Noem calls Los Angeles a “city of criminals”: “They are not city of immigrants, they are a city of criminals”….

The destruction of a few driverless taxis has received far more attention and condemnation than efforts by plainclothes federal agents to seize children from elementary schools by lying about having parental consent….

Americans have been drilled into reflexively siding with law enforcement and demanding perfection of the oppressed, so married to the sanctity of individual property rights that preservation of private wealth becomes the litmus test for righteousness, not the underlying cause at the heart of the protest….

The enforced disdain is also why Politico can run anonymous quotes from Republicans convinced that they’ve scored a political victory by unleashing the military on Americans.

“We couldn’t script this any better,” one gleeful person close to the White House tells my Playbook colleague Dasha Burns. “Democrats are again on the ‘20’ side of an 80-20 issue. … It’s the same thing that won [Trump] the election.”

In the eyes of the White House, Trump already had a clear mandate from voters for the mass deportation effort that was driving those ICE raids in LA. And aides believe the chaotic scenes that followed — masked protesters pelting police with rocks, setting fire to cars and waving Mexican flags on abandoned freeways — will only bolster public support for Trump’s hard-line approach. Indeed, every time a Dem speaks out against the president’s actions in LA, the White House is happier still.

Publishing the smug boasts of a fascistic regime celebrating is how insulated outlets like Politico and its journalists are from the peril facing everyday Americans — or at least how insulated they think they are from the application of autocracy.

The gloating Trump officials were at least in part reacting to the first set of poll numbers on the protests, which showed a plurality of the public registering disapproval of the protests. It’s little wonder why — public opinion in cases like this is shaped almost entirely by news coverage — and for reporters used to soulless reactionary political strategy, it amounted to a final judgment on the worthiness of the protests….

 

The Imperial Boomerang Lands in Los Angeles (Director’s Cut)

Spencer Ackerman, 10 Jun 2025

…check out this excellent Brian Merchant piece on the LA protesters summoning and burning driverless Waymo cars. In addition to all of his insightful points about “weaponizing the accountability sink” of autonomous vehicles—and see this 404 Media media piece from Jason Koebler about Waymo as a surveillance wellspring for police—it strikes me that we’re seeing a glimpse of the future of innovative urban unrest. If the LA protesters didn’t deliberately turn Waymos into flaming improvised barricades, those who come after them will. And I suspect the scolds who hate seeing property burn more than they hate seeing people kidnapped would applaud if the Hong Kong demonstrators set autonomous vehicles alight…..

 

Men DOGEbags at Work

DOGE Is on a Recruiting Spree 

[Wired, via Naked Capitalism 06-09-2025]

 

Strategic Political Economy

Amid Trump’s Immigration Onslaught, There Is No Sanctuary

Evelyn Quartz, June 12, 2025 [The Lever]

Amid the fear, chaos, and violence playing out on the streets, the protections promised by neoliberalism are nowhere to be found….

The Power To Punish Without The Capacity To Care

To understand why this is happening, it’s important to look at what neoliberalism did to American life. Over the past four decades, both parties helped hollow out the idea that the government should provide meaningful material goods for the public. Public housing was gutted. Health care was privatized. Social services were fragmented and offloaded to nonprofits. Immigrant defense was no exception — it was left to overwhelmed legal clinics, volunteer networks, and civil society groups running on grants and burnout.

Sanctuary laws were passed into this vacuum. Such efforts tried to draw a moral line in a system that had already been dismantled — one where the tools of enforcement remained fully funded, but the tools of protection were nowhere to be found. Now, as raids unfold, that gap is laid bare. The state has no rapid legal defense plan. The city has no coordinated response. There is no visible apparatus of care.

That’s what neoliberalism leaves behind: a government that can still surveil, police, and deport, but can no longer house, heal, or shield its people. A state that retains the power to punish, but not the capacity to care.

So when Trump reasserts that power to punish, as he’s doing now, there is nothing in place to stop him. And worse: Democratic officials, still clinging to a playbook of statements and symbolism, offer little more than moral condemnation. Instead of addressing or even acknowledging a political status quo that has not only gotten us here but that no longer commands legitimacy, Democrats are doubling down on what’s broken….

 

The Ten Warning Signs of The Collapse of the Knowledge System

[Honest Broker, via The Big Picture June 8, 2025]

A huge change is coming. Would you believe me if I told you that the biggest news story of our century is happening right now—but is never mentioned in the press? That sounds crazy, doesn’t it? But that is often the case when a bold new worldview appears.

 

The big, bad bond market could derail Trump’s big, beautiful bill

[Vox, via The Big Picture June 8, 2025]

Trump wants to blow a $3 trillion hole in the budget. The bond market is saying “no way.”

 

Global power shift

How Xi Jinping lost control – A timeline

[YouTube, via Naked Capitalism 06-10-2025]

 

China’s Chokehold on This Obscure Mineral Threatens the West’s Militaries

[New York Times, via The Big Picture June 14, 2025]

China produces the entire world’s supply of samarium, a rare earth metal that the United States and its allies need to rebuild inventories of fighter jets, missiles and other hardware.

 

Top U.S. General in Africa Paints Grim Picture of U.S. Military Failures in Africa

Nick Turse, June 8 2025 [The Intercept]]

After two decades, and many failed counterterrorism efforts, the Trump administration is considering shuttering U.S. Africa Command.

 

World Bank Data On India And Pakistan Shows Massive Contrast Over Poverty 

[NDTV, via Naked Capitalism 06-10-2025]

 

Russia Seeks ‘Asymmetrical’ Response For Strike On Its Nuclear Assets 

[Moon of Alabama, via Naked Capitalism 06-10-2025]

 

Full Event: Lavrov Brutally Takes Down UK, Rips NATO Over Ukraine, Then Drops Iran & China Shocker 

[Hindustan Times, via Naked Capitalism 06-10-2025]

 

Secret British plans to ‘defeat entire Russian Black Fleet’ revealed in leaks 

[The Grayzone, via Naked Capitalism 06-12-2025]

 

Gaza / Palestine / Israel

Israel and Iran: Where Are We Now?

Thomas Neuburger, Jun 13, 2025

 

Iran Claims Historic Espionage Coup Against Israel. Is It a Bluff or Is It Real? 

Ryan Grim and Murtaza Hussain, June 11, 2025 [Drop Site]

 

Oligarchy

Rituals of humiliation 

[The Anti-Empire Project, via Naked Capitalism 06-12-2025]

How does one join the dizzying heights of the elite? Not the 10%, the 2%, or the 1% of professional or business success, but the billionaire class, the House of Representatives, Governor of a major state or mayor of New York City? Is it by proving your merit in school, a bit of good luck, perhaps a grinding mindset as aspirants are taught to hope? Or by family connection and bloodline, as those doomed to fail may fear?

Certainly it’s the latter. But there is a missing ingredient that aspirants should know before they set out to try to join this genocidal Western club.

In the book Codes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate, Italian political scientist Diego Gambetta talks about how in certain circumstances it is rational for subordinates (say, enforcers who are collecting extortion money from businesses) to display to their superiors how incompetent they are (at, for example, actually running a business). This is a display of loyalty: an incompetent subordinate can only survive at the boss’s whim, and is therefore going to be loyal. Taking some irreversible action can also show loyalty: the importance of tattoos to criminal organizations is an example. Getting a specific tattoo permanently affiliates a criminal with others in the group, a valuable display of loyalty.

The codes of the underworld help answer the question: why did the whole elite, Republicans and Democrats, Hollywood and Wall Street and Silicon Valley, go to the private island of convicted-then-assassinated child abuser Jeffrey Epstein?

Epstein’s activities were the proclivity of some, others were ensnared through the normal methods spies use, but for others it was probably understood as the equivalent of getting a tattoo: one must make oneself reputationally destroyable as a condition of getting into the elite. When this kind of thing blows up, with members accusing one another and people like Epstein or his mentor Robert Maxwell meeting with fatal accidents, it reveals the pattern in sufficient detail for researchers like Whitney Webb to document them (in the two-volume One Nation Under Blackmail). Neither sexual abuse nor blackmail are the point: the point is to undergo rituals that prove your subordination is absolute, and that you can therefore be trusted to exercise your power according to (genocidal) principles.

The greater the power sought, the greater the display of submission required….

 

The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

Capital’s Regime Change and the Neoliberal Monetary Debate

[History & Political Economy Project, via Naked Capitalism 06-09-2025]

 

Wealth inequality’s deep roots in human prehistory 

[Science Daily, via Naked Capitalism 06-10-2025]

 

Millions of student-loan borrowers are getting a ‘financial scarlet letter’ that could risk their home purchases and job prospects, Elizabeth Warren says 

[Business Insider, via Naked Capitalism 06-10-2025]

 

Trumpillnomics

RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine advisory committee

Associated Press, June 09, 2025 DK

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday removed every member of a scientific committee that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on how to use vaccines and pledged to replace them with his own picks.

 

American doctors are moving to Canada to escape the Trump administration

KFF Health News, June 09, 2025 [DailyKos]

Earlier this year, as President Donald Trump was beginning to reshape the American government, Michael, an emergency room doctor who was born, raised, and trained in the United States, packed up his family and got out.

Michael now works in a small-town hospital in Canada. KFF Health News and NPR granted him anonymity because of fears he might face reprisal from the Trump administration if he returns to the U.S. He said he feels some guilt that he did not stay to resist the Trump agenda but is assured in his decision to leave. Too much of America has simply grown too comfortable with violence and cruelty, he said.

“Part of being a physician is being kind to people who are in their weakest place,” Michael said. “And I feel like our country is devolving to really step on people who are weak and vulnerable.”

Michael is among a new wave of doctors who are leaving the United States to escape the Trump administration…. The Medical Council of Canada said in an email statement that the number of American doctors creating accounts on physiciansapply.ca, which is “typically the first step” to being licensed in Canada, has increased more than 750% over the past seven months compared with the same time period last year — from 71 applicants to 615.

 

[X-Twitter, via Heather Cox Richardson, June 11, 2025]

Justin Wolfers
@JustinWolfers
The US & Chinese trade negotiators have negotiated a handshake agreement to seek signoff  to agree that a previously-agreed agreement is still their agreed upon agreement. (That agreement is not an agreement but a framework for seeking future agreements.)

 

Predatory finance

Do tax havens still matter?

Richard Murphy, June 14 2025

 

BlackRock, Goldman Scale Up Tax Trades in $3 Trillion SMA Boom

[Bloomberg, via The Big Picture June 13, 2025]

BlackRock Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are among firms scaling up a strategy known as tax-loss harvesting, typically offered through customized portfolios called separately managed accounts.

 

Yale Is Rushing to Sell Billions in Private Equity Investments

[New York Times, via The Big Picture June 13, 2025]

The university is selling multiple stakes in private equity funds as the industry struggles and President Trump targets Ivy League institutions.

 

Health care crisis

Private Equity, UnitedHealth Take a Huge Loss as Oregon Bans Corporate Control of Doctors 

Matt Stoller [BIG, via Naked Capitalism 06-12-2025]

 

‘So Much Evil Had To Happen for this Bill To Pass’ Oregon just made corporate medicine illegal, again. Here’s how it happened.

Maureen Tkacik June 13, 2025 [The American Prospect]

 

Information age dystopia / surveillance state

The Pentagon Disinformation That Fueled America’s UFO Mythology

[Wall Street Journal, via The Big Picture June 14, 2025]

U.S. military fabricated evidence of alien technology and allowed rumors to fester to cover up real secret-weapons programs.

 

GitHub is Leaking Trump’s Plans to ‘Accelerate’ AI Across Government 

[404 Media, via Naked Capitalism 06-12-2025]

 

Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry 

[Associated Press, via Naked Capitalism 06-10-2025]

 

News Sites Are Getting Crushed by Google’s New AI Tools

[Wall Street Journal, via The Big Picture June 13, 2025]

Chatbots are replacing Google’s traditional search, devastating traffic for some publishers.

 

Collapse of independent news media

Journalists and Their Shadows (w/ Patrick Lawrence) | The Chris Hedges Report

Chris Hedges, Jun 12, 2025

Patrick Lawrence and Chris Hedges chronicle the decline of mainstream media and the craft of journalism, and the dark psychological reality behind media complicity in schemes of the powerful….

Lawrence points to psychological disruptions within journalists as a result of the nature of their work as part of the reason why the press has deteriorated. “The corruptions in the press begin with the corruptions of the personalities who want to get paid, want to be promoted, and so on,” he says.

Instead of employing the Socratic process of reasoning, mainstream journalists today have agendas they must serve….

Climate and environmental crises

Kabul at risk of becoming first modern city to run out of water, report warns 

[The Guardian, via Naked Capitalism 06-12-2025]

 

Democrats’ political malpractice

Schumer’s Iran Position Is Stupid  

Bill Scher, June 6, 2025 [Washington Monthly]

 

Resistance

Going Out to a Protest? Here’s How Not to Get Arrested.

Laura Flynn, June 14 2025 [The Intercept]

Lawyer Isabella Salomão Nascimento on knowing your rights — and getting the cops to respect them.

 

How to Stay Safe Protesting ICE — and What to Expect From Cops in Your City

Akela Lacy, June 14 2025 [The Intercept]

Do police in your city use tear gas or rubber bullets? Repression tactics from Seattle to Chicago, plus how to prepare.

 

‘IAM Max’: Machinists Rally for Member Detained by ICE 

[Labor Notes, via Naked Capitalism 06-12-2025]

 

Trump Has Put a Target on SEIU, and the Labor Movement Is Fighting Back 

[In These Times, via Naked Capitalism 06-12-2025]

 

Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

Some Republicans Opposed Using Troops Against Protests in 2020. Now They’re Marching in Lockstep.

Matt Sledge, June 13 2025 [The Intercept]

 

A long hot summer

Thomas Mills, June 11, 2025

The United States is in the midst of the biggest backlash we’ve seen in decades. Resentment against immigrants is driving the narrative today, but anger at various minority groups and those seen as supporting them is fueling an attempt at reordering American society. The animus is driven by predominantly White Christian hostility to darker-skinned people and other religions, but it includes a class element that attracts working class people of color who feel left behind in an evolving society and economy.

Liberals should be prepared to find themselves on the wrong side of most Americans, even if they believe they are on the side of the angels, on deportations. People approve of Trump’s immigration actions. They believe that most immigrants need to go back to where they came from. They believe Trump is making the country safer by deporting criminals and terrorists. They will tolerate a lot of ugly behavior from ICE and the administration if they think immigrants are getting the boot.

Joe Biden’s immigration policy was a political disaster for Democrats. He ignored the demand of a majority of citizens to get a handle on the Southern border and reduce the flow of immigrants into the country. Most people won’t make much of a distinction between those who are here legally and those who aren’t. They just want a lot of them gone. Snatching people off the street, cutting off their communication with loved ones, and detaining them in unknown locations may be cruel and inhumane, but most Americans will look away, believing ICE is doing unpleasant but necessary work to rid our country of “illegals.”

Trump understands this American zeitgeist and is baiting progressives. He wants outrage and protests. He sent ICE into places where he knew he would get a reaction. He wanted protests and riots and he got them. He’ll use them as an excuse to expand his power.

Early polls show people supporting Trump’s decision to send the National Guard to LA by large margins. They won’t make much distinction between federalizing the National Guard and sending in the Marines. They’ll just see the moves as efforts to restore peace in cities plagued by burning and looting. The images of masked men standing on burning Waymos waving Mexican flags and groups of brown-skinned men burning American flags reinforces their sense that the country is being inundated by criminals from foreign countries….

We’re in the early stages of an attempt to divide America fueled by a backlash against the Civil Rights Movement, marriage equality, immigration, the negative impacts of trade deals, and the technological revolution. Trump is trying to normalize a heavy-handed response by the federal government. Right now, people are sympathetic, but their tolerance will eventually run out. If crack downs become too harsh or the unrest lasts too long, he may pay a political price. It’s probably going to be a long, hot summer.

[TW: But Les Leopold writes that deportations do not have working-class support:]

Does Trump Have White Working-Class Support for Deporting Undocumented Workers?

Les Leopold, June 11, 2025

…Does the public at large endorse these arrests? Don’t working-class people in general want these undocumented workers deported to alleviate job competition? That apparently reasonable commonsense claim turns out to be wrong. according to recent survey data.

I reviewed this data in a recent Substack, but it bears repeating because it is so important to clearly understand what working people actually support.

The Cooperative Election Study (CES), with more than 500,000 respondents, asked the following question repeatedly from 2010 to 2020.

“Are you in favor of granting legal status to all illegal immigrants who have held jobs and paid taxes for at least three years and have not been convicted of any felony crimes.”….

 

Civic republicanism

How Do You Measure Corporate Power? Count the Marines in LA 

[America’s Undoing, via Naked Capitalism 06-11-2025]

[TW: Yglesias demanding people show their “measure” of corporate power is like telling Sam Adams, Ben Franklin, and the Committees of Correspondence that their list of grievances was irrelevant unless they could somehow measure the power of the Board of Trade in London.

[But more to the point, measures of corporate power have been published for decades, and Yglesias ignoring them amounts to a bald faced lie. Corporate market domination are well known measures of corporate power used by anti-trust enforcers for decades — well known to anyone but Yglesias, that is. Similarly, many economists have argued that the skew of share of profits from labor to corporations in the national income accounts shows not just corporate power, but the emergence of an economy domination by rentier extraction. Yglesias is such a shameless whore.]

 

Politics Without Purpose. 

Aurelien [Trying to Understand the World, via Naked Capitalism 06-12-2025]

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 8, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

 

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

 

National Guard to be sent to L.A. amid clashes; Newsom calls Hegseth’s threat of Marines ‘deranged’

[Los Angeles Times, June 7, 2025]

 

Trump’s Rubicon moment

ZACK STANTON, 06/08/2025 [politico.com/playbook]

Trump: “If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can’t do their jobs, which everyone knows they can’t, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!”

….

What Trump is doing is incredibly rare: “It is the first time since 1965 that a president has activated a state’s National Guard force without a request from that state’s governor,” NYT’s Shawn Hubler and Laurel Rosenhall report, citing Elizabeth Goitein of the Brennan Center. “The last time was when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators in 1965, she said.”

Also worth flagging: The National Guard “has nearly non-existent law enforcement training or doctrine despite it always being talked about as a domestic force,” as Military.com’s Steve Beynon notes.

What’s the basis of the legal authority here? The Times notes that “the directive signed by Mr. Trump cites ‘10 U.S.C. 12406,’ referring to a specific provision within Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services. Part of that provision allows the federal deployment of National Guard forces if ‘there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.’” Naturally, then, language from the administration aims to underscore the threat of rebellion, danger or invasion.

 

The Trump Family’s Money-Making Machine

[Bloomberg, via The Big Picture June 1, 2025]

…no modern American president has positioned his family to make so much money while in the White House. Already, since the early days of his reelection campaign, he’s more than doubled his net worth to about $5.4 billion.

In that time, the Trump name has powered more than $10 billion of real estate projects, a multibillion-dollar valuation for his money-losing social-media company, more than $500 million in sales from just one of his crypto ventures and millions of dollars more from stakes in companies that offer financial services, guns and drone parts. Family members have also scored an array of corporate positions — at least seven new roles as an adviser or executive for his oldest son, Donald Trump Jr., alone.

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 1, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 1, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

Strategic Political Economy

Why Are They Trying to Kill Us?

Conor Gallagher, May 28, 2025 [Naked Capitalism]

For all the talk of how incompetent our elites are, there’s one area where they show remarkable skill and determination: relentlessly creating conditions to shorten the lifespans of the disabled, poor, and working class.

Let’s look at just a few of the many examples before examining potential reasons it’s becoming so much more brazen.

In the US, policies to hurt the working poor and disabled are nothing new, but they’ve exploded in scope in recent years. Elites have collectively memory-holed an ongoing pandemic that has thus far officially killed more than 1.2 million (although that number is likely much higher), disabled many more, and fallen disproportionately on the working class and disabled….

The US official line is now openly that such weak people simply aren’t worth the investment….

In the telling of RFK Jr. and friends, public healthcare coddles the weak, which is real soft Nazi stuff. As Derek Beres puts it:

By avoiding discussion of education, employment, social support networks, economic status and geographic location – the social determinants that public health experts agree influence health outcomes – Kennedy, in lockstep with top wellness influencers, is practicing soft eugenics.

But let’s not forget that the Biden administration was in some cases outdoing the current one….

The cuts to disability benefits will decimate quality of life, erode services, and lead to earlier deaths, but that appears to be the point. Again, though, this is nothing new. A report published last year by the Institute of Health Equity at University College London, finds that between 2011 and 2019, 1,062,334 premature deaths were recorded among individuals living outside the wealthiest 10% of areas in England mostly due to poverty and austerity measures….

What is central to all these Western countries? Neoliberalism. Is it surprising that an ideology that says markets are more important than people would completely hand over social policy to the wealthiest and embrace eugenics?….

 

Republican Senator to Medicaid Cuts Protesters — ‘We’re All Going to Die’

[Newsweek, May 30, 2025]

During a tense exchange with protesters at a town hall, Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa responded to concerns over potential Medicaid cuts by declaring, “Well, we are all going to die.”

YouTube video

www.youtube.com/…

GOP’s Latest Pitch for Gutting Medicaid and Food Aid? ‘Well, We All Are Going to Die’

Jake Johnson, May 30, 2025 [CommonDreams]

“We’re at the point where a U.S. senator is saying healthcare and hunger don’t matter because we all die eventually.”

 

Musk’s Legacy of Death vs the Rising Movement for Life

William J. Barber, II and Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, May 30, 2025 [Our Moral Moment w/ Bishop William Barber & Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove]

…DOGE is a scam, but its consequences are real. According to research at Boston University, more than 300,000 people have died because of the careless cuts Musk made to the USAID program, decimating US investment in fighting hunger and disease around the world….

… we know every lie has its limits in a universe that is held together by truth. No lie can live forever, just as no tyrant can abuse power without eventually facing consequences. People can be deceived. We can be distracted. We can even be self-absorbed. But when death draws near enough to touch us, people also have an innate instinct to live.

This is what we see: life is rising up in people to cry out for life.

That’s what we hear in the graduation speeches that are calling young people to stand for truth and in the judicial decisions that are making clear that Trump’s abuse of power is illegal. Life is rising up to cry for life in protests and direct actions, in legal motions and in petitions to members of Congress. At Moral Mondays in DC, which will continue this coming Monday, June 2nd, we’ve witnessed life welling up in people who refuse to accept the unnecessary death.

How do we stop the lie? This is the question we hear most these days. It’s at the center of our prayers. This is what we know: we stop the lie by standing with the people who are most directly harmed by it….

According to the Public Religion Research Institute’s Robert P. Jones, who publishes on Substack at White Too Long, “If you look at the population as a whole, only 30% of American adults cast a vote for Trump in 2024. There’s no legitimate way to read this election as a blank check for the destructive attacks on our nation’s basic values and institutions.”….

 

This dashboard visualizes the human impact of funding changes for aid and support organizations.

[impactcounter.com, via Our Moral Moment]

Deaths caused by Funding Discontinuation

99,639 Adult Deaths

207,911 Child Deaths

Deaths Per Hour 103

 

A Storm in the West: The Liberal Intellectual Paradigm Is Broken 

A. Crooke [Conference paper, via Naked Capitalism 05-25-2025]

…The real action in the US is not happening in seminars at Brookings or in op-eds in the New York Times. It is happening backstage, out of sight; beyond the reach of polite society, and mostly off-script. America is undergoing a transformation more akin to what befell Rome in the age of Augustus. Which is to say, the main happening is the collapse of a paralytic élite order, and the consequent unfolding of new political projects….

 

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

By Calling More Than Half the Country ‘Scum,’ Trump Is Raising a Bright Red Flag

Thom Hartmann, May 27, 2025 [Common Dreams]

When political leaders use dehumanizing language to vilify their opponents, they’re in actuality laying the groundwork for authoritarianism, repression, and violence.

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – May 25, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – May 25, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution, Part 1

GOP Budget Would Make It Even Harder to Hold Trump Administration in Contempt

Shawn Musgrave, May 24 2025 [The Intercept]

…The looming showdown over the judiciary’s power to issue contempt orders stems from a single sentence tucked into the thousand-page budget bill, which passed the House of Representatives by a single vote on Thursday.

“This is a slap in the face to the concept of separation of powers,” said a spokesman for Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.).

If enacted, the provision — found on page 544 out of 1,082 — would restrict how federal judges can hold government officials or other litigants in contempt if they defy court-issued injunctions and restraining orders. Contempt is the primary enforcement mechanism available to courts, and in cases around the country judges have weighed whether to issue contempt findings against President Donald Trump’s deputies….

Although this is technically a budget bill, items in it from that wish list include a significant restriction on “the authority of federal courts to hold government officials in contempt when they violate court orders,” as Dean of Berkeley Law School Erwin Chemerinsky explained in Just Security Monday. “Without the contempt power,” he writes, “judicial orders are meaningless and can be ignored.”

 

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

 

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

 

Debating Trump “Ambush” of South African President With “White Genocide’ Lies

Yves Smith, May 22, 2025 [Naked Capitalism]
Trump’s goals were clear. I wrote yesterday that he was pushing the phony “white genocide” narrative to:
  • Retaliate against South Africa for going to the ICJ regarding the actual genocide in Gaza, to get them to back off more.
  • Cheapen the public discourse over “genocide” — helping turn it into just another meaningless slur.
  • Make it seem like Trump is standing up for alleged oppressed white folks, to play to some white working-class voters who don’t perceive that it’s actually — again — for Israel (similar to how they repackaged Palestine protests as an immigration issue).
  • Push back against BRICS to the extent it’s challenging US establishment dominance, or appears to be doing so.

He lectured him on alleged abuses in South Africa and Ramaphosa was at best doing a diplomatic defense.

Trump orders the government to stop enforcing rules he doesn’t like

Maxine Joselow, Hannah Natanson and Ian Duncan [Washington Post, via downwithtyranny.com 5-19-2025]

At the Transportation Department, enforcement of pipeline safety rules has plunged to unprecedented lows since President Donald Trump’s inauguration.
Trump recently ordered Energy Department staff to stop enforcing water conservation standards for showerheads and other household appliances. And at one Labor Department division, his appointees have instructed employees to halt most work related to antidiscrimination laws.
Across the government, the Trump administration is trying a new tactic for gutting federal rules and policies that the president dislikes: simply stop enforcing them.
“The conscious effort to slow down enforcement on such a broad scale is something we have never seen in previous administrations,” said Donald Kettl, a professor emeritus at the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy. “It amounts to a dramatic assertion of presidential power and authority.”
This account of the Trump administration’s efforts to scale back application of many laws is based on interviews with more than a dozen federal employees across seven agencies, as well as a review of internal documents and federal data….
In some cases, Trump has personally ordered a halt to enforcement. The president on May 9 signed a memorandum directing the Energy Department “not to enforce” what he called “useless” water conservation standards for home appliances including bathtubs, faucets, showerheads and toilets….

 

Heather Cox Richardson, May 20, 2025 [Letters from an American]

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem was testifying before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee about the Department of Homeland Security’s budget for fiscal year 2026. When Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH) asked her to define “habeas corpus,” Noem’s response indicated she has no understanding of the nation’s fundamental law.

“Habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country,” Noem said. Hassan corrected her: “Habeas corpus is the legal principle that requires that the government provide a public reason for detaining and imprisoning people. If not for that protection, the government could simply arrest people, including American citizens, and hold them indefinitely for no reason. Habeas corpus is the foundational right that separates free societies like America from police states like North Korea.”

 

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – May 18, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

Trump in TROUBLE as Amy Coney Barrett SNAPS at Supreme Court (YouTube video)

[Legal AF, May 16, 2025]

[TW: Leah Litman, Michael Popok and Alex Aronson discuss the Supreme Court hearings on Friday 5-16-2025. This is ostensibly about birthright citizenship, but perhaps the more important issue is  whether US District courts can impose injunctions nationwide. I do not recall ever before having linked to a discussion of Supreme Court hearings, but these were extraordinary in showing how (anti)Republicans and conservative are attempting to obliterate two and a half centuries of legal development and reasoning in the USA republic’s experiment in self government. Recall that the (anti)Republicans and conservatives / libertarians repeatedly sought and obtained injunctions to stop implementation of Biden policies they disliked. But now that Democrats and liberals are stopping Trump policies with court injunctions, (anti)Republicans and conservatives / libertarians are arguing that only the Supreme Court can impose nationwide injunctions.

[But it’s even worse: Trump’s former personal attorney, now serving as U.S. Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, actually argued that a court injunction can apply only to the particular case and the particular litigant. (This was the point in the hearings that Justice Amy Coney Barrett sputtered “Really?” with some incredulity.) In other words, according to Sauer, if you want to prevent Trump / Musk / DOGE from disposing of 12,351 workers from an agency, you would need 12,351 injunctions for each of the 12,351 agency workers to protect all of them. As Justice Sonya Sotomayor, pointedly asked Sauer, “You’re talking about the hundreds and thousands of people who weren’t part of the judgment of the court. They would all have to file individual actions?”

Litman, Popok and Aronson also discuss how (anti)Republicans and conservatives / libertarians are pushing for laws and legal decisions that would almost totally restrict the path for class action lawsuits, the only alternative to using court injunctions to legally protect large groups of people. With this, you see the outlines of the legal assault on American law and jurisprudence that has been developed during the past half century in the seminars and conferences by the Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society, Mercatus Center, and the rest of the apparatus of plutocrat-funded conservatives and libertarian entities.

[As I have argued before, the “left’s” response to this assault on American law and jurisprudence has been crippled by the “left” rejecting the legitimacy of American history and institutions for being based on racism and misogyny. I firmly believe this is the primary reason the doctrines and ideas being developed by conservatives and libertarians were largely ignored for the past half century. The “left” has yet to deal with the question of why the plutocrats are expending so much to reinterpret and change American law and jurisprudence. What was there in place before the plutocratic assault that plutocrats want to obliterate, and the “left” has been ignoring?

[Especially frightening is that “Justices” Thomas and Alito appear to have accepted Sauer’s arguments.]

In Birthright Citizenship Case, Trump DOJ Asks Supreme Court Justices to Make Themselves Irrelevant

Garrett Epps, May 16, 2025 [Washington Monthly]

… Thursday’s argument had two aspects, which appeared and disappeared like the Katzenjammer Kids playing peekaboo throughout the nearly three hours of oral argument. The Court had formally assembled to hear the first: When is it okay for one federal district judge to block a government policy nationwide?

The second was: Has every Congress, every Court, and every administration for the past century and a half read the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause wrong, leaving Donald Trump, on his sole authority, to upend the rule that all babies born in the U.S., except the children of diplomatic families, are citizens at birth?

Though Sauer began his argument by boldly proclaiming the administration’s novel interpretation of the Amendment (it applied, he said, only to the children of free slaves in 1868 and has no effect on the children of immigrants today), he quickly moved to the administration’s real aim in bringing this “emergency docket” application before the Court.

In Sauer’s view, the case was about a broader issue than the permissibility of “universal injunctions” (federal district court orders that block new executive policies nationwide). Article III of the Constitution, which created the federal judiciary and gives it its powers, he argued, does not permit any federal court, at any level, to issue such injunctions.

This raises the question: What if the government loses in the district court—and then loses again in the Court of Appeals? What if it loses in the Supreme Court? What court can order it to stop engaging in behavior that Article III courts have found to violate the Constitution?

Without quite saying so, Sauer let it be known that the answer is: None.

If plaintiffs won in the Supreme Court, he graciously conceded, they could take the judgment to the bank—for themselves, that is. But Sotomayor asked him, once the Court decided the constitutional issue, would its order bind the government to stop the unconstitutional action against anyone?

Well . . . said Sauer . . . Not so much.

The result of such a case, Sauer said, would not be a Supreme Court order binding everyone else, but instead a Supreme Court precedent. And of course, plaintiffs still being injured by a government policy (for example, by being rendered stateless by an executive order) could cite that precedent in their cases. “If there was a decision that violated the precedent of the Court, then the affected plaintiffs could get a separate judgment,” he said.

Responded Sotomayor, “You’re talking about the hundreds and thousands of people who weren’t part of the judgment of the court. They would all have to file individual actions?”

Maybe not, said Sauer—if the case could satisfy “the rigorous criteria of Rule 23,” to be certified as a class action.

But if not, said Sotomayor, “you are claiming that not just the Supreme Court—that both the Supreme Court—and no lower court can stop an executive from universally, from violating those holdings by this Court.”….

If a president can simply wave away that much adverse authority—and then only grudgingly apply his losses in court—then the role of the federal courts will be, from now on, quite different from the one they have played for the past 100 years. American-style judicial review would become something like the Mexican writ of amparo, by which parties can get a judgment blocking an unconstitutional law only as to their individual cases; others in the same situation must go to court to get their own amparo. In the atomized world envisioned by the administration, judicial review might be called the Writ of Sisyphus. No matter how often a court pushes the rock up the hill, it will face the same task over and over if the government so chooses.

 

The Visionary of Trump 2.0: Russell Vought is advancing a radical ideological project decades in the making.

McKay Coppins, May 16, 2025 [The Atlantic, via ownwithtyranny.com]

…Vought’s critics have warned that elements of his agenda— for example, unilaterally cutting off funding for congressionally established agencies such as USAID— are eroding checks and balances and pushing the country toward a constitutional crisis. But in interviews over the past several weeks, some of his allies told me that’s the whole point. The kind of revolutionary upending of the constitutional order that Vought envisions won’t happen without deliberate fights with Congress and the judiciary, they told me. If a crisis is coming, it’s because Vought is courting one.
Bannon told me that mainstream Republicans have long complained about runaway federal bureaucracy but have never had the stomach to take on the problem directly. Vought, by contrast, is strategically forcing confrontations with the other branches of government. “What Russ represents, and what the Romneys and McConnells don’t understand, is that the old politics is over,” he said. “There’s no compromise here. One side is going to win, one side is going to lose, so let’s get it on.”
… Vought himself has written that we are living in a “post-Constitutional time.” Progressives, he argues, have so thoroughly “perverted” the Founders’ vision by filling the ranks of government with unaccountable technocrats that undoing the damage will require a “radical” plan of attack. “The Right needs to throw off the precedents and legal paradigms that have wrongly developed over the last two hundred years,” he wrote in an essay for The American Mind, a journal published by the Claremont Institute.
What exactly would such an approach look like in practice? Mike Davis, a Republican lawyer and a friend of Vought’s who helped steer judicial nominations in Trump’s first term, told me that he expects an escalating series of standoffs between the Trump administration and the judicial branch. He went so far as to say that if the Supreme Court issues a decision that constrains Trump’s executive power in a way the administration sees as unconstitutional, the president will have to defy it. “The reptiles will never drain the swamp,” Davis told me. “It’s going to take bold actions.”

The End of Rule of Law in America

Page 1 of 43

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén