The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

Author: Tony Wikrent Page 3 of 46

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – September 21, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – September 21, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

A killing at sea marks America’s descent into lawless power

[Defense One, via The Big Picture, September 14, 2025]

The peremptory strike on a speedboat is a warning to all who serve. Remember your oath.

The War on Terror Template For The Post-Charlie Kirk Crackdown

Spencer Ackerman, 15 Sept 2025 [forever-wars.com]

…Long before the Kirk slaying, a similarly designed effort sought to reclassify nonprofits within the liberal fundraising infrastructure, as well as the left-wing institutions that support Palestine, as domestic terrorists. That failed, but that was before there was a shooting of a conservative celebrity to exploit. This is their Saddam Hussein-era Iraq, and they really want to invade. One of the things they want most of all, as they wanted after Oklahoma City and as they wanted after 9/11, is to define their enemies as terrorists so their violence can only be seen as counter-terrorism. Counterterrorist violence enjoys legitimacy by default.…

After Pat Robertson died in 2023, I wrote this, about Robertson’s fantastical attributions of blame for 9/11:

“It’s irrelevant that they offered no material explanation for how gays and liberals were the real culprits for 9/11. What mattered instead was the signal they sent, that there didn’t need to be a material explanation for the attacks—there just needed to be a pre-existing enemy, here at home, whose works bore a culpability for the 9/11 atrocity that was realer than the truth. Not only was there no need to reassess, as Sontag suggested, America’s military and economic relationship with oppressive Arab and Muslim governments, Robertson and company saw in the War on Terror a new front for a culture war, which for them meant a religious war.”

…In 2025 as in 2001, the goal remains wielding permanent political, economic and social power. In the intervening years of the War on Terror, its normalized violence became ever more available as an option for those dreaming of such enduring dominance….

Sanctified: Martyring Charlie Kirk — How the Trump regime is turning a murder into permanent power

Jim Stewartson, Sep 16, 2025 [MindWar]

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder, the U.S. federal government is openly engaging in an unconstitutional criminal conspiracy to persecute, dismantle and disenfranchise its political opposition with the clear goal of making future elections a foregone conclusion….

Here are the five pillars of the Trump regime’s new doctrine:

  1. Sanctify Charlie Kirk as a martyr. Kirk’s murder was a perfect flashpoint for the Trump regime to turn its narrative of white, Christian, male persecution into a war cry against Democrats. Kirk is no longer a racist, misogynist podcaster; he is a slain Christian crusader. (“See you in Valhalla”)
  2. DARVO Kirk’s murder. Within hours, Trump blamed Kirk’s murder on the “radical left” with no evidence. This is the abuser’s favorite tactic—Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim & Offender. Never admit you were wrong. Always blame your own victims. This has not relented in this case in spite of facts that contradict the narrative.
  3. Expand the enemy to Democrats. While Trump initially blamed the “radical left” and many of the initial actions are aimed at scapegoats like “Antifa” and transgender people, the rhetoric is far more broadly aimed at “Democrats,” “the left” and liberals.
  4. Convert outrage to quasi-legal machinery. While continuously applying rhetoric designed to dehumanize political enemies as “violent terrorists,” the regime promises to abuse powers such as RICO, conspiracy, and insurrection against increasingly broad categories of people.
  5. Use emergency powers to complete a de facto coup. The regime will weaponize unrest caused by its own violence and oppression to unconstitutionally seize more power through declaring emergencies, expand the militarization of blue cities, and ensure that mid-term elections are either meaningless or “postponed.”

Each part of this plan has been either openly promised, or heavily implied in public statements by Trump or his closest advisors in the last few days. There has been no deviation from their pre-determined narrative….

Neo-COINTELPRO

COunter-INTELligence-PROgram (COINTELPRO) was J. Edgar Hoover’s campaign against his political targets….

The Trump regime has a different approach. It displays its anti-democratic goals proudly and makes no illusions about what it wants or how it intends to get it. While it took decades of investigations to uncover the damage Hoover had done, one of the most alarming things about the Trump regime is that its neo-COINTELPRO is not clandestine, it is overt. There is no apparent concern about future consequences….

DOJ Scrubbed Study Showing Right-Wing Violent Attacks Outpace All Other Extremism

Jason Paladino, Sep 12, 2025 [via dropsitenews]

…The original paper, authored by six researchers and published last year, is still available thanks to The Internet Archive at this link.…

The study’s findings are not surprising to anybody living in the real world:

“Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives. In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.”

The timing for this apparent censorship could not be more suspect. As members of Congress, MAGA influencers and the president himself have signaled that they’re out for leftist blood….

Trump Administration Rushes To Kill Free Speech In Response To Kirk Assassination 

Caitlin Johnstone [via Naked Capitalism 09-17-2025]

[A useful collection of quotes from regime officials]

J. D. Vance, Charlie Kirk, and the Politics-as-Talk-Show Singularity

Andrew Marantz, September 18, 2025 [The New Yorker]

Broadcasting from the White House, the Vice-President seemed to complete the merger of politics and red-meat live streams—and to threaten more ominous crackdowns ahead.

Remember This Week—It’s the Week America Became a Different Place

Michael Tomasky, September 19, 2025 [The New Republic]

Trump 2.0 has executed any number of offenses against the Constitution, human decency, and more. But here’s why the Jimmy Kimmel matter is different—and the most dangerous move yet.

Trump’s Latest Crypto Play Is His Biggest and Most Corrupt Yet

Nitish Pahwa, Sept 04, 2025 [Slate, via The Big Picture, September 14, 2025]

The entire Trump family just cashed in on another big cryptocurrency payday. This Labor Day, the digital-assets firm World Liberty Financial—which the president’s three sons co-founded just a year ago—launched a public sale of its flagship WLFI tokens, spurring $1 billion worth of trades on popular crypto exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance (all of whose founders have ties with the current administration). Collectively, the Trump family already holds billions of World Liberty coins, and the public trading—carried out mostly overseas and involving few retail traders—boosted the value of those tokens. Per the Wall Street Journal, the four male Trumps involved made as much as $5 billion on Monday, in what was “most likely the biggest financial success for the president’s family since the inauguration.”

…. The companies behind the $TRUMP meme coin (one of which shares an address with the president’s Florida golf club) held an auction that traded hoards of tokens for chances to dine with the Donald himself; according to the New Yorker, the Trumps and their partners netted $320 million from transaction fees alone….

And Trump keeps pacifying the crypto industry at large, signing deregulatory legislation into law and dropping Biden-era investigations into various companies that have since worked with his crypto projects—like Binance, Crypto.com, and Coinbase….

Here’s What Trump’s Offering People Who Help Fund His New Ballroom

Rachel Kahn, September 19, 2025 [The New Republic]

Trump Firing Top Prosecutor for Failing to Invent Fake Crimes by Foes

Greg Sargent, September 19, 2025 [The New Republic]

Russ Vought’s Scheme Has Been Unmasked

Rosa DeLauro September 16, 2025 [The American Prospect]

The courts have decided: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russ Vought broke the law. The American people deserve to know how their tax dollars are being spent, but time and again, Russ Vought hides the truth.

During the Biden administration, I led the charge to require the public disclosure of legally binding funding decisions known as apportionments. When I drafted this requirement—and it was signed into law—it was not about which party held power. It was about showing the American people how their hard-earned taxpayer dollars are being spent in their communities.

On March 24, at Russ Vought’s command, OMB illegally removed this transparency website. At the end of July, United States District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan emphatically ruled that Vought has been illegally hiding his sabotage of investments and services for over four months. The courts continued to deny OMB’s request to keep hiding their stealing, with a panel of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit forcing Russ Vought to restore the website on August 15 with equally forceful criticism of his lawlessness. While OMB was slow to share the information, and they have yet to post all that is required under the law, one thing is clear: Russ Vought and his relentless desire to single-handedly control every investment in American communities have been unmasked….

Kimmel wasn’t suspended for a joke about Kirk — he was suspended for mocking Trump.

Dean Obeidallah, Sep 18, 2025

The same corporate media helping Donald Trump silence dissent, wants you to believe that Jimmy Kimmel was suspended “over his Charlie Kirk comments.” That’s a lie. The joke that angered MAGA world did not include any barbs or attacks on Kirk in any way. Rather the joke was mocking Trump….

Kimmel then mocked Trump’s bizarre response to the fatal shooting on Friday—which I also played on my show given the jarring nature of it. When asked by a reporter how he was “holding up,” Trump had said, “I think very good,” before then quickly adding, “And by the way, right there you see all the trucks. They just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House.” An excited Trump then bragged that the new ballroom was “gonna be a beauty. It’ll be an absolutely magnificent structure.”

Kimmel used that reaction for the joke, saying about Trump, “He’s at the fourth stage of grief, construction.” He added to big laughs, “This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish.”

Trump’s Ouster of Jimmy Kimmel Is Much Worse Than You Think It Is

Greg Sargent, September 18, 2025 [The New Republic]

Anna Gomez, the FCC’s lone Democratic commissioner, tells TNR that chairman Brendan Carr’s move violates both the First Amendment and the Communications Act. Democrats must extract consequences.

The 1933 Nazi Playbook That Explains Why ABC Cancelled Kimmel

Richard Murphy, September 20 2025 [Funding the Future]

This is too important, and frightening, not to share:

The speaker is Tad Stoermer, an academic historian who suggests he is:

Torching lies
Teaching resistance
Explaining revolution.
He is the author of ‘A Resistance History of the United States’ (Steerforth Press, 2026). He is a
lecturer at Johns Hopkins University and a visiting scholar at the University of Southern Denmark.

Trump Files $15 Billion Libel Suit Against The New York Times And Its Reporters 

[Forbes, via Naked Capitalism 09-14-2025]

Trump’s lawsuit mentions several articles published by the paper, including an editorial calling him unfit for office, and a book, “Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success,” published by Times investigative reporters Russ Buettner and Susanne Craig. In the filing, Trump’s attorneys allege that the paper and the journalists “maliciously published the Book and the Articles knowing that these publications were filled with repugnant distortions and fabrications about President Trump.”

Judge throws out Trump suit against New York Times 

[The Hill, via Naked Capitalism 09-20-2025]

60 violations in 50 days: Inside ICE’s giant tent facility at Ft. Bliss

[Maxar, Reuters / The Washington Post, Sep 16, 2025]

As the Trump Administration rushes to open massive makeshift holding centers nationwide, one former official called the list of violations at Fort Bliss among the worst she’s ever seen.

A Prosecutor Sues — Maurene Comey v. The Department of Justice

Joyce Vance, Sep 15, 2025 [Civil Discourse]

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Maureen Comey, in a wrongful termination lawsuit filed today against the government….

There is a lot of factual and legal detail in the case, but it’s important because it will have an impact on Trump’s ability to fire at will in the federal bureaucracy, ignoring existing civil service protections for government employees, not just at DOJ, but likely closer to government wide. The 38-page complaint alleges the following violations of law when Comey was fired:

  • Violation of the United States Constitution (Article II and Separation of Powers) (Against All Defendants): Article II gives the president the ability to appoint and fire “principal officers” (like U.S. Attorneys), but as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Comey is an “inferior officer”, subject to governance by Congress, which created civil service provisions that prevent firing without due process or without cause and rendering the way Comey was fired a violation of the law.
  • Violation of the Administrative Procedure Act 5 U.S.C. §§ 706(1) and 706(2) (Against All Defendants): Comey’s firing violated the Administrative Procedure Act by withholding the due process she was entitled to and firing her in an arbitrary, capricious fashion that is contrary to the Constitution and goes beyond what the law permits.
  • Violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (Ultra Vires in Violation of Statutory Authority) (Against All Defendants): Ultra vires means acting beyond one’s legal power or authority. Comey claims that because her firing violated the law, it is ultra vires, so it has no legal force or effect, and it’s as if she was never fired…..

Because that’s a lot, and because this is a very important case, we’ll spend time tonight going through the allegations in the complaint in more detail. What’s at stake is the ability of the president to fire prosecutors, even exemplary ones, because he doesn’t like them, or their father, or the cases they’ve been working on, or simply thinks they lack personal loyalty to him, or just wants to get rid of them. That’s no way to run the Justice Department, where prosecutors have civil service protections that make it difficult to fire them absent solid cause. But the administration did an end run around those longstanding rules in Maurene Comey’s case, despite the fact that she’d been asked to be the lead prosecutor on “a major public corruption case” just the day before she was fired….

The Age of Monsters [Citizens United]

Josh Marshall, Sept 19, 2025 [Talking Points Memo]

We live in an age of monsters: Elon Musk, Donald Trump, the Ellison family, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, the sundry billionaires who don’t own apps. This may sound like a caustic and dramatic comment coming from me. Some of them are genuine monsters: Musk, Trump, probably Thiel. In other cases, like with Zuckerberg, they are probably more or less normal and might even be okay to have lunch with. But functionally, in the role they play and power they wield in our society, they are monsters. And the function of the Trump era has been to wind them all together into a single formation, first by allurement and then by force.

This realization first started to dawn on me in the years after Citizens United, the court decision that essentially ended meaningful campaign finance law in the United States. It came in the first reactions to Citizens United or more specifically the spending it made possible. Billionaires and centi-millionaires started gaining publicity and critical reactions to the scale of their spending and the impact it had on elections. Political giving at scale by the extremely wealthy wasn’t new. It had just taken a half-century hiatus. Perhaps the difference was the internet. Whatever it was, the years after 2010 spawned the idea that the very wealthy and the extremely powerful needed to be afforded more protections, more privacy for their giving then ordinary people who might donate $50 or even $5,000 up near the candidate donation limit….

 

Strategic Political Economy

Ford Shutting Down its Glass House Headquarters

Robert Schoenberger, Sept. 15, 2025 [IndustryWeek]

After more than 70 years in its iconic building in Dearborn, Michigan, Ford Motor Co. plans to tear that facility down after 2027 when it moves into a new campus a few miles away.

“We were never going to leave Dearborn. We’ve been here for 122 years,” Chairman Bill Ford said in a video released with the announcement. Still, the move out of the iconic Detroit-area building will be a major change.

The new facility will be built about three miles away, next to Ford’s tech center and vehicle proving grounds—near the campus of the Henry Ford Museum of American Innovation. Once finished, the four-story structure will have about 2.1 million square feet of office and meeting space, about double the 12-story structure it replaces….

[TW: Ford moving management next to the engineers is a very hopeful sign. Probably much too late, but hopeful.]

 

Global power shift

New security pact between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan

[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 09-20-2025]

I don’t think I’m exaggerating by saying that this truly is the US’s Suez moment: Saudi Arabia just entered into a NATO-like alliance with Pakistan whereby “any attack on either country is an attack on both.”The symbolic is extraordinary: Saudi Arabia was in many ways THE poster child of US client states. If they no longer trusts American security guarantees, why should anyone else? And of course the fact this actually happened and wasn’t prevented by the U.S. is immensely telling in and of itself.This has so many other consequences that it’s almost too much to fathom:- First of all, it means that Saudi Arabia now benefits from Pakistan’s nuclear deterrence….
– This undoubtedly kills IMEC (India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor), the Biden administration’s flagship grand strategy to counter China’s Belt and Road that was supposed to connect India to Europe via Saudi Arabia
– There is a monetary aspect too: this is another nail in the coffin of the petrodollar system (an agreement to price oil exclusively in USD in exchange for US protection). Saudi Arabia is now much more flexible to price oil in whatever currency it wishes

China’s trade with Africa outracing the rest of world, supplanting North America

Kevin Walmsley [via Naked Capitalism 09-15-2025]

Chinese exports to the United States are down double digits since the beginning of the year.

But China’s exports overall are much higher than expected, as Chinese firms are successfully expanding into new markets.

This is glaringly true of Africa. Bilateral trade between China and Africa is rocketing higher, and doing so in surprising ways.

Chinese exports to Africa are high up in the value chain: advanced machinery, vehicles, electronics, and power generation.

But these products are also falling in price, making them more affordable then ever to Africa’s emerging middle class and business sectors.

It is also a de-dollarization story. Chinese banks make trade credit and finance widely available using pools of renminbi. African firms can far more easily access capital in RMB compared to USD, and are refinancing their dollar-denominated debts to the Chinese currency.

From Research Academy to State Venture Capitalist: The transformation of Chinese Academy of Sciences 

[Sinocities, via Naked Capitalism 09-18-2025]

Intel chip architect Su Fei returns to China after 20 years in the US

Ling Xin, 12 Sep 2025 [South China Morning Post]

The award-winning engineer with a reputation for mentorship has taken up an endowed chair professorship at Tsinghua University

Central Banks Now Hold More Gold Than U.S. Treasuries

Christina Comben, September 11, 2025 [thecoinrepublic.com]

Central banks now hold more gold than U.S. Treasuries for the first time since 1996, prompting big questions about the health of the dollar and the future of “hard money” in the global financial system.

Funds Shifting Away From US Assets Due to Trump, Mercer Says 

[Bloomberg, via Naked Capitalism 09-18-2025]

 

Gaza / Palestine / Israel

Israel as ‘Super-Sparta?’ — Netanyahu’s Insanity and Arendt’s Prophecy

John Ganz, Sep 16, 2025 [Unpopular Front]

Zionist Lawfare Operation Facing Collapse? 

Kit Klarenberg [via Naked Capitalism 09-15-2025]

Families of US citizens killed by Israel say Trump administration refuses to investigate 

[Middle East Eye, via Naked Capitalism 09-18-2025]

Israel’s Intelligence Service Mossad: The Myth of “Long Arms” and the Reality of Failure 

Elijah J. Magnier [via Naked Capitalism 09-19-2025]

 

Russia / Ukraine

Is Russia really going to build Europe’s largest high-speed rail network? 

Brian McDonald [Naked Capitalism 09-15-2025]

 

Oligarchy

Most Of Billionaires’ $7.6 Trillion Has Never Been Taxed 

[Americans for Tax Fairness, via Naked Capitalism 09-18-2025]

American billionaires reached a record breaking $7.6 trillion of personal wealth as of Labor Day 2025, up $4.7 trillion (or 160%) in the less than eight years since the first Trump-GOP tax law was enacted in December 2017, according to the latest billionaires report from Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) based on Forbes data. Most of that wealth increase (an estimated 56%, or $4.2 trillion) has never been taxed and may never be under current law. But key Democrats, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), and Rep. Donald Beyer (D-VA) are introducing a major overhaul in the tax code which would finally end that injustice by taxing billionaire wealth gains as they are made….

GRAPH — US billionaires and their net worth, 2025 compared to 2017

…Enactment of the 2017 tax law is used as the starting point to track billionaire wealth growth because it likely turbo-charged the process. The law’s centerpiece was a two-fifths cut in the corporate tax rate, reducing it from 35% to 21%. Since 93% of corporate stock is owned by the wealthiest 10%–including billionaires–corporate tax cuts are by definition tax cuts for the rich. The law also reduced the top individual tax rate, the one that applies to the great bulk of the richest Americans’ income. Meanwhile, the law failed to close any of the many loopholes enjoyed by the rich; the biggest one for billionaires is the tax-free status of wealth-growth income.

Leading economists have determined that on average, the wealthiest 400 families paid an effective federal income tax rate of just 8.2% in recent years, when the increased value of their stock is counted. That means billionaires can pay lower tax rates than middle-class workers like teachers, nurses, and firefighters. An analysis of billionaire tax data found that 26 of the wealthiest billionaires paid an effective tax rate of just 4.8% on a $500 billion increase in their collective fortune between 2013-18. ProPublica also found that billionaire Jeff Bezos paid $0 in federal income tax from 2007 through 2011.

The Plutonomy Is Still Going Strong — For the last 20 years, analysts have known that this is an economy by and for the rich.

David Dayen September 18, 2025 [The American Prospect]

We are closing in on the 20th anniversary of one of the most revealing pieces of bank analyst research in recent American history. On October 16, 2005, Citigroup released an “industry note” for investors that started with a bracing statement: “The World is dividing into two blocs—the Plutonomy and the rest.”

Plutonomy is defined as an economy where, well, plutocrats provide the lion’s share of the economic activity and have a distortionary effect on economic statistics. One way to describe it is that if Bill Gates walked into a room with three laborers, the average wealth of all four in the room would be in the billions. But that wouldn’t tell you anything about the circumstances of the non–Bill Gates members of the sample, or how the economy feels to the “average” person in the room. “Consensus analyses that do not tease out the profound impact of the plutonomy on spending power, debt loads, savings rates (and hence current account deficits), oil price impacts … are flawed from the start,” the note explains….

The top 10 percent have been increasing their overall share of consumer spending for the past three decades, from a little over 35 percent in 1994 to 49.2 percent in the most recent quarter, a new record high according to Moody’s analyst Mark Zandi. Breaking out income earners by level of consumer spending, as Zandi did, shows that while the bottom 80 percent of earners spend at levels consistent with the Consumer Price Index, the top 20 percent spend at staggeringly higher levels. “The U.S. economy is being largely powered by the well-to-do,” he concluded….

How can we hold together the concepts of soft employment numbers, higher inflation, and climbing retail sales? You can search for reasons to explain why U.S. consumers are lying, spending with abandon even as they despise the economic picture. Or you can simply reject the average and look to the differences within the income distribution. If you do, you reveal the K-shape: Consumer spending is being driven by the top 10 or 20 percent, and unemployment, food insecurity, and gloominess are driven by everyone else. Both groups are experiencing inflation, but only the lower-income earners truly feel it. Higher-income folks are happy to spend more money on goods and services, bolstered by fat wallets and stock portfolios….

Top 10% account for nearly half of all consumer spending 

[News Nation Now, via Naked Capitalism 09-20-2025]

 

Felonomics

GRAPH — Stagflation, a dilemma for the Fed

[Hakyung Kim, via The Big Picture, September 14, 2025]

Here’s the inflation breakdown for August 2025 — in one chart

[CNBC, via The Big Picture, September 14, 2025]

US economy: stagflation now more than a whiff 

Michael Roberts [via Naked Capitalism 09-17-2025]

[TW: Lotsa graphs]

‘I’ve Never Seen Anything Like It’: Trump Policies Leave US Farmers in Dire Straits

Brett Wilkins, September  16, 2025 [CommonDreams]

…After Trump slapped 30% tariffs on Chinese imports in May, Beijing retaliated with measures including stopping all purchases of US soybeans. Before the trade war, a quarter of the soybeans—the nation’s number one export crop—produced in the United States were exported to China. Trump’s tariffs mean American soybean growers can’t compete with countries like Brazil, the world’s leading producer and exporter of the staple crop and itself the target of a 50% US tariff.

“We depend on the Chinese market. The reason we depend so much on this market is China consumes 61% of soybeans produced worldwide,” Kentucky farmer Caleb Ragland, who is president of the American Soybean Association, told News Nation on Monday. “Right now, we have zero sold for this crop that’s starting to be harvested right now.” … It’s a five-alarm fire for our industry that 25% of our total sales is currently missing…”

Trump Says the U.S. Will Institute $100,000 Fee for Skilled Worker Visas 

[New York Times, via Naked Capitalism 09-20-2025]

Defense Bill Opens Door To Guns-For-Hire At The Border 

Katya Schwenk, Sept 17, 2025 [The Lever]

The $893 billion defense policy bill that passed the House of Representatives last week would grant the Department of Defense unprecedented new authority to deploy private military contractors to the United States’ southern border.

A provision in the legislation, tacked on in a July amendment, for the first time gives the Defense Secretary authority to outsource the agency’s work at the border, a proposal that critics warn could prove a bonanza for the shadowy mercenary and private security firms that work with the Pentagon, often with little public transparency….

Memphis asks Shelby County chancellor to invalidate all agreements with city unions 

[USA Today, via Naked Capitalism 09-17-2025]

 

The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

Neoliberalism Comes for the Warfare State 

[Compact, via Naked Capitalism 09-14-2025]

“If so many of these countries around the world are incapable of governing themselves, it’s time for us to just put the imperial hat back on, to say we’re going to govern those countries … You can say that about pretty much all of Africa; they’re incapable of governing themselves.” So claims Erik Prince, the billionaire entrepreneur of the modern mercenary business. Speaking on his podcast Off Leash, the founder of Blackwater Worldwide advocated for the United States to get back into the intervention business, albeit with a twist: Rather than sending American troops to enforce order abroad, the dirty work of empire should be contracted out to private firms. Prince’s provocation is not a relic of colonial thinking but rather a fact of modern politics: a neoliberal model of state violence.

Prince’s latest venture has been security contracting in weak countries, primarily Haiti and Peru. He has carved out a niche for himself by offering a market-based option for functions typically performed by sovereign states—in particular, the exercise of violence for both domestic order and operations abroad. In Haiti, Prince’s services have been retained to combat rampant gang violence near Port-au-Prince, where opportunistic non-state actors have all but taken over territories surrounding the capital city. In Peru, Prince’s company Vectus Global recently signed a contract worth $10 million a year to eliminate criminal networks that threaten the country’s gold mines. Governments too strained to monopolize violence within their borders engage Prince, who brings the organization, discipline, and technology that local security forces lack….

Affordable Housing Out of Reach for Half of All U.S. Workers 

[Governing, via Naked Capitalism 09-17-2025]

HOMELESSNESS ON THE RISE IN MIAMI-DADE DESPITE STATEWIDE SLEEPING BAN, NORTH MIAMI-DADE SEES 74% INCREASE 

[Hoodline, via Naked Capitalism 09-17-2025]

The social crisis fueling the collapse of democracy in America 

[WSWS, via Naked Capitalism 09-19-2025]

One of the leading mouthpieces of big business, the Wall Street Journal, gave a glimpse of this deepening crisis in an article posted Wednesday on its website with the headline, “The Two-Speed Economy Is Back as Low-Income Americans Give Up Gains.” The article is published in the newspaper’s Thursday print edition under the headline, “Divergent American Economy Gets More Divided.”

“There are two economies in the U.S. right now, and they are moving in different directions,” the commentary begins, noting that higher-income Americans “are still spending like gangbusters,” while for most workers, wage growth “has petered out.” The article continues, “Those workers are curbing their spending and in some cases are struggling to find jobs.” Unemployment is hitting African Americans and young people particularly hard, while home prices and rents are soaring.

“The divided fortunes of rich and poor in the U.S. may sound like an old story,” the Journal acknowledges, but “the gulf is widening again.” Wage growth for the bottom third of workers was the smallest in August since 2016, and these workers could spend only 0.3 percent more than a year ago. With inflation at nearly 3 percent, and prices on many essential goods rising much faster than that, this means a cut in real consumption….

 

They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

The Epstein Files and the 5-Count Felon Bank: The Untold Story

Pam Martens and Russ Martens, September 18, 2025 [counterpunch.org]

[TW: You should save this to your computer, or at least book mark it, because this will stand as one of the definitive explanations of the crime ring behind Epstein, and Trump’s attempts to cover up]

…The way that JPMorgan Chase facilitated money laundering for Epstein sounds uncannily similar to how it facilitated money laundering for Ponzi kingpin Bernie Madoff. Both Epstein and Madoff used JPMorgan Chase as their primary bank according to court records. And the bank made multi-million dollar loans to both men.

FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge George Venizelos said this in a formal statement when the two felony counts were lodged against JPMorgan Chase in 2014 over its Madoff conduct:

“J.P. Morgan failed to carry out its legal obligations while Bernard Madoff built his massive house of cards. Today, J.P. Morgan finds itself criminally charged as a consequence. But it took until after the arrest of Madoff, one of the worst crooks this office has ever seen, for J.P. Morgan to alert authorities to what the world already knew. In order to avoid these types of disasters in the future—we all need to be invested in making our markets safer and more equitable. The FBI can’t do it alone. Traders, compliance officers, analysts, bankers, and executives are the gatekeepers of the financial industry. We need their help protecting our markets.”

Let that carefully sink in for a moment. JPMorgan Chase, then and now headed by media darling Jamie Dimon (as both Chairman and CEO) was simultaneously laundering money for two of the biggest criminal masterminds in U.S. history. Exactly what was it that these two Machiavellian marauders found so comforting about running their financial affairs out of JPMorgan Chase? The answer is more than likely found in a three-letter acronym—SAR, short for Suspicious Activity Report. If you were running illicit billions of dollars through the bank, and generating big profits for the bank, that pesky detail of filing those SARs in a timely fashion with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), as legally mandated, somehow gets forgotten at the bank, at least in both the Madoff and Epstein cases.

Despite enormous red flags on weird money transactions, JPMorgan Chase failed to file any Madoff-related Suspicious Activity Reports until Madoff confessed to his crimes in December 2008 after being turned in to prosecutors by his sons….

FinCEN plans to delete data on U.S. companies from beneficial ownership database

Carmen Molina Acosta, September 17, 2025 [International Consortium of Investigative Journalists]

Five years after ICIJ’s FinCEN Files investigation exposed the pivotal role the U.S. financial system plays in global dirty money flows, authorities are winding back landmark reforms pushed through in the wake of the revelations, prompting widespread concerns from transparency advocates.

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network — the namesake of ICIJ and BuzzFeed News’ 2020 investigation — announced last week that it expects to delete ownership information that U.S. companies submitted as part of the launch of the previously celebrated company ownership registry….

Experts told ICIJ that the move further guts the Corporate Transparency Act, a 2021 bipartisan law passed months after the publication of the FinCEN Files aimed at cracking down on anonymous shell companies that facilitate illicit finance. A key part of the legislation was the establishment of the company ownership registry, which was officially launched last year amid ongoing political and legal challenges, and which required companies operating in the U.S. to submit ownership information to the Treasury.

In March, the Treasury Department moved to exempt all U.S. businesses from the requirement, meaning only foreign-owned firms operating in the U.S. would need to comply with the reporting obligations. The potential destruction of data would be “doubling down on Treasury’s unlawful gutting of this statute,” Ian Gary, executive director of the Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency (FACT) Coalition said.

 

Restoring balance to the economy

Monopoly Round-Up: Did the Death Blow of Hollywood Just Happen? 

Matt Stoller [BIG, via Naked Capitalism 09-15-2025]

On Jimmy Kimmel: It’s Time to Destroy the Censorship Machine and Repeal the Telecommunications Act of 1996 

Matt Stoller [BIG, via Naked Capitalism 09-19-2025]

…Axios did a useful round-up of the broader context, which is the roll-up of media properties by oligarchs over the last few years. In 2022, Elon Musk bought Twitter, Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post and killed a Kamala Harris endorsement, LA Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong blocked his paper’s endorsement of Harris, Univision got bought by a Trump-friendly outlet, and the Baltimore Sun did as well. Apple, Google, and Meta CEOs have all moved in more Republican directions, in Meta’s case explicitly settling with Trump for millions of dollars over deplatforming allegations. And now Trump ally, Oracle’s Larry Ellison, is trying to buy CNN-owner Warner Bro. Discover, and potentially TikTok.

While this kind of political behavior is disturbing, it’s important to see that there are really two separate problems. The first is Trump’s choices, and he is seeking controls over his critics. The answer to an elected leader doing these kinds of things is ultimately elections. The public must express disapproval, and if they do not, then that is that. Elections aren’t my forte, so I’ll leave that to others.

The second problem is that the tools exist for Trump to engage in a coercive censorship regime because Bill Clinton and a Newt Gingrich-led Republican Congress helped consolidate the media with the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which supercharged a wave of media and telecom consolidation kicked off by Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. As More Perfect Union noted, “In 1983, 50 companies controlled 90% of the U.S. media market. That number is now down to 5.” If the ability to wield power over content exists, it will likely be purposed, and Trump isn’t the first one to do it….

Why was the 1996 law so important? The fundamental thrust of the Telecom Act was to overturn New Deal restrictions on media consolidation. That law changed strict bright line media ownership rules that prohibited acquisitions of local stations by chains, and moved them to a discretionary system where regulators could approve such acquisitions, which they did and are doing now. It also, not coincidentally, laid the foundation for broadband monopolies with its deregulation of telecom providers, and big tech, with Section 230 that disallowed a whole suite of common law rules from applying to platforms.

 

Creating new economic potential – science and technology

This Brick Is the World’s Most Boring Climate Solution 

[Atmos, via Naked Capitalism 09-18-2025]

“If you have solar energy and you want to use it for an industrial process, first thing you need to do is find a way to store it,” O’Donnell said. If he could design a tool capable of storing that electricity, he explained, “we could actually create these conditions where large flows of private capital would build profitable projects that would solve the problem.”

After 15 years of work and prototyping, O’Donnell created his firebrick: the cornerstone of his new company and the defining feature of Rondo Energy’s heat battery.

The battery looks simple; it is anything but. Composed of a stack of bricks placed inside a steel container about half the size of an NBA basketball court, it functions like a rechargeable furnace. Electricity from solar panels and wind turbines flows into the device and gets converted to heat, reaching searing temperatures in excess of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit. The heat is locked away, ready to be released hours or days later. When a factory calls for power, air is pushed through the glowing bricks, emerging as a blast of heat or steam hot enough to forge steel or fire cement. AI systems fine-tune the process, delivering precise energy on demand. Designed to be modular and easy to install, these brick batteries can drop into existing facilities, O’Donnell said, replacing fossil-fuel boilers and supplying factories with round-the-clock clean heat….

Medical Breakthrough: Chinese Scientists Develop Bone Glue That Heals Fractures in Just Three Minutes

[International Business Times, September 13, 2025]

In a huge medical breakthrough, scientists in China have reportedly invented a bone glue that sets within three minutes and can heal fractures. The project, known as “Bone-02,” was unveiled to the public by researchers in China’s Zhejiang Province on September 10, according to NDTV, citing local reports.

 

Information age dystopia / surveillance state

The old SF tech scene is dead. What it’s morphing into is far more sinister.

[SF Gate, via The Big Picture, September 18, 2025]

If you commute from the East Bay into the gray heart of San Francisco, you’ll see them everywhere.

They string together nonsense words. They stare at us with dead eyes. They exalt the far right while claiming to be apolitical. And, worst of all, they bully us: As you wait to board the crowded Muni bus home after a long day at work, they brag about how they’ll eventually replace you and rob you of your livelihood.

In the year 2025, billboards advertising artificial intelligence have become inescapable, crowding the city’s skyline and sneering at us from every corner. To the average person, they’re both dystopian and indecipherable, and for cash-bloated executives behind these campaigns, that’s the point….

According to tech recruiters, executives believe that perfectly capable, intelligent people who have been laid off are “table scraps” and “damaged goods.” Mark Zuckerberg wants us to trust and develop relationships with his digital chatbots, stating that “the average American, I think, has fewer than three friends.” Meanwhile, his same company’s guidelines also previously said that it was totally “acceptable” for them “to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.” Marc Benioff is practically frothing at the mouth to cut costsdeclaring that now, thanks to his company’s new fleet of AI workers, “We can have less support agents, human support agents, more digital support agents. We can mix our human labor with our digital labor in a new way and create an incredible new Salesforce.” ….

What these tech oligarchs are ultimately telling us, dear friend, is that they simply don’t care about us, and when they finally pillage every last resource the Earth has to offer, they’ll happily throw back $64 olive oil shots while dancing like idiots on our graves.

After child’s trauma, chatbot maker allegedly forced mom to arbitration for $100 payout 

[Ars Technica, via Naked Capitalism 09-18-2025]

 

Climate and environmental crises

Only a third of world’s river basins experienced normal conditions in 2024

[The Guardian, via Naked Capitalism 09-18-2025]

Increasingly erratic water cycle is creating food scarcity, rising prices, conflict and migration, says UN agency

Did your area just have its most humid summer? Find out.

[Washington Post, via The Big Picture, September 15, 2025]

More than 120 million people across the United States just experienced a near-record humid summer. See how humidity patterns are changing in your region.

Texas Oil Boom Spawns a Toxic Crisis of the Industry’s Own Making 

[Bloomberg, via Naked Capitalism 09-20-2025]

Hawk Dunlap fought fires and blowouts in oil fields around the world over a 30-year career, but nothing prepared him for what he found when he finally came home to Texas. There, on the Permian Basin’s dusty expanse, Dunlap encountered towers of toxic wastewater that gushed more than 100 feet (30 meters) in the air, bursting through oil wells cemented shut decades ago. It was unlike anything he’d ever seen in Algeria, Uzbekistan or Iraq.
So was the resistance to his attempts to figure out the cause.
When Dunlap was asked by a rancher to investigate leaking wells owned by Chevron Corp., he expected state regulators to help. Instead the commission that oversees oil and gas operations in Texas directed the ranch’s concerns to its lawyers. Relations with Chevron deteriorated into an acrimonious lawsuit. And after the rancher captured drone footage of wastewater spewing high into the sky, the regulatory commission made the area a no-fly zone, citing safety concerns….
Three years after Dunlap began investigating, the wells are still leaking. The problem of too much wastewater is spreading across America’s biggest oil field, posing a pressing threat to a basin that has grown into a cornerstone of global markets and is critical to President Donald Trump’s push for energy dominance….
The RRC has long known that underground water disposal increased the risk of earthquakes. The practice was found to cause seismicity in North Texas around 2008 because the fluid put pressure on natural rock faults, leading them to slip. But the tremors in the early days of the Permian’s growth were small, and the RRC was content to take a “reactive not proactive” approach to seismic activity, according to one internal presentation.
The RRC adopted guidelines for permitting disposal wells in seismically active areas in 2019 but was forced to change tack on March 26, 2020, when a 4.9 magnitude earthquake struck near Mentone, Texas, in the heart of the Permian. It was the fifth-biggest in the state’s history and was felt 200 miles away in El Paso.

How Climate Scientists Saw the Future Before It Arrived

[Quanta Magazine, via The Big Picture, September 20, 2025]

Over the past 60 years, scientists have largely succeeded in building a computer model of Earth to see what the future holds. One of the most ambitious projects humankind has ever undertaken has now reached a critical moment.

 

Democrats’ political malpractice

Right-Wing Propaganda All The Way Down

Brian Beutler, Sep 16, 2025 [Off Message]

I reflect frequently on the hours and days after the January 2021 insurrection, how clear it was to me and a small handful of others that House Democrats should have impeached Donald Trump on January 7, and used his remaining two weeks in office leaning on Mitch McConnell to convene a trial, remove Trump from the presidency, and disqualify him from future office.

Instead, fear and a vision of a future dominated by recriminations took hold of Democrats, and they scattered. Multiple Senate Democrats announced that they didn’t want to dwell on the attack; Nancy Pelosi adjourned the House; the moment of maximal GOP disarray passed; Trump avoided accountability.

When the impeachment trial finally did convene of February 9, after Trump had already left Washington, Senate Democrats were once again half-hearted about it….

“I want to focus as much attention right now on the Biden agenda as possible and minimize the attention on anything other than the Biden agenda,” said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), before the trial began—forecasting that the trial would be a box-checking exercise.…

I think it’s safe to say there is no longer even a partial symmetry between the parties on this score—particularly after Donald Trump signed his megabill cutting taxes and health care. The entire apparatus of the government is now geared in various ways toward harming and weakening progressives, liberals, leftists, Democrats, and their constituents. That has become the end in and of itself….

 

Resistance

Paper Clip Protest

Joyce Vance, Sep 20, 2025 [Civil Discourse]

On Thursday, E. Jean Carroll started it: Paper Clip Protest.

“Comely Reader! I suggest we all start wearing the paper clip. Subtler than a red hat, more powerful as a CONNECTION,” she wrote, explaining they were also worn during World War II as a sign of resistance against the Nazis.

Norwegian teachers and students wore paper clips to signal their opposition to Nazi occupation. They attached them to their lapels and wore them as jewelry, a symbol of solidarity binding them together as paper clips did with papers. It was a quiet act of defiance, expressing that Norwegians remained united against Nazi rule.

Friday, when I signed on to tape the Podcast, Jill Wine Banks had a clip delicately attached to the collar of her shirt. It made me smile. In that moment, I knew E. Jean was onto something. Our defiance can and must be loud and public at this point. But the quiet symbol of solidarity on someone’s collar when you walk into a crowded room? Genius. And much better than a red hat.

 

Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

Violence As Policy in Trump’s America

Jan-Werner Mueller, Sep 12, 2025 [project-syndicate.org]

Unlike the Democrats and most Americans, many leaders on the right view their supporters’ violence as legitimate.

Debunking ANTIFA — How the alt-right created a meme the Trump regime intends to use in its crackdown

Jim Stewartson, Sep 19, 2025 [MindWar]

[TW: One of the best examinations of how Trumpists created a false, dangerous meme]

…Here is the Google Trends chart for “antifa”—which shows the number of times the word was searched for—showing almost no activity at all until 2017… With the exception of Rose City Antifa, a loose group of anti-racists and antifascists in Portland, Oregon started in 2007 to protest a neo-Nazi festival, it did not exist as a national concept until 2017….

On August 17th, 2017, infamous alt-right troll Microchip posted this petition to the White House. It was picked up by right-wing outlets like Breitbart and promoted heavily through the MAGA echo chamber. Note the spelling, with a capital-F, a flourish that did not survive its later permutations…

A week later, 8/24/17, Politico interviewed Microchip who made it very clear what “antifa” really is:

“It was to bring our broken right side together” after Charlottesville, he said, “and prop up antifa as a punching bag.”

“So the narrative changed from ‘I hate myself because we have neo-Nazis on our side’ to ‘I really hate antifa, let’s get along and tackle the terrorists,’” he explained.

Here are some of the Discord logs released by Microchip, along with his partner James Brower (“Dreamcatcher”) that show them in the process of turning the petition into a weaponized meme….

Despite the continuous stream of hoaxes and lies about the phantom of Antifa, a bill was introduced the House in June 2018, the Unmasking Antifa Act, which sought to penalize people for up to 15 years for wearing a mask while committing a violent act. It didn’t pass, but it validated the idea of “Antifa” as a threat and kept the term in the public consciousness.

Antifa continued to be stoked online through fake accounts through 2019 and by white nationalist groups like the Proud Boys, who used it as their rallying cry—“Fuck Antifa! Fuck Antifa!” This was punctuated by an incident in 2019 in which alt-right provocateur Andy Ngo, working for the Thiel-funded Quillette, was sprayed with silly string and hit with a milkshake by antifascist activists at a Proud Boys rally.

We Are All antifa Now

Chris Hedges, Sep 18, 2025

The designation of the amorphous group antifa as a terrorist organization allows the state to brand all dissidents as supporters of antifa and prosecute them as terrorists.

Israel, Charlie Kirk, and the Weaponization of Murder (w/ Max Blumenthal)

Chris Hedges, Sep 15, 2025

Charlie Kirk’s assassination will likely serve as the crux of a new era of political violence and repression in the United States. In the days since Kirk was shot at a speaking event at Utah Valley University, right-wing groups and figures have demanded mass censorship of all critical online speech directed at Kirk. President Donald Trump has effectively attributed the attack to the “radical left” and vowed to go after those he deems responsible. Mass doxing campaigns targeting people who contextualized Kirk’s politics or celebrated his killing has led to firings across the country….

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade apologizes for saying mentally ill homeless people should be executed 

[Associated Press, via Naked Capitalism 09-14-2025]

 

The South Rises Again

Let Your Light Shine

Bishop William Barber & Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, Sep 18, 2025 [Our Moral Moment]

“I think this is the time when preachers and those of us in pulpits that have a responsibility to challenge a nation and its morality must say to those in power, “Stop it. Stop lying.” ….

Donald Trump has demonstrated that he has the power to remove some comedians who mock him on national news networks and to punish journalists who tell the truth about him and the agenda he is enacting. But he is not the first authoritarian in US history to abuse power while he invests in propaganda to spread lies and distract attention from the way their policies harm most Americans.

We are both from North Carolina, where authoritarians manipulated the truth for generations to cling to power. Plantation owners were outraged when a democratically elected legislature, made up of Black and white citizens for the first time, imposed taxes on their extreme wealth in order to guarantee public education to everyone in the state after the Civil War. Because public education was popular, those authoritarians did not channel their anger into a political campaign to cut education. Instead, they invested in propaganda that played on racial fears to pit white people against Black neighbors. Their lies inspired lynch mobs that terrorized generations of citizens in the Jim Crow South….

 

The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

The Secret Curriculum That Rewired America’s Judges

Lucy Dean Stockton, Sep 11, 2025 [The Lever]

new study in the Quarterly Journal of Economics reveals that nearly half of U.S. federal judges attended crash courses in economics at the conservative-leaning Manne Economics Institute for Federal Judges between 1976 and 1999 — and it changed how they behaved on the bench.

Reviewing more than a million circuit and district court rulings, the study’s researchers found that after attending the popular economics “training,” judges ruled against regulators more often and imposed more severe sentences against criminals.

This isn’t the first evidence that “law and economics” courses push judges to the right. The same authors previously found that Manne attendees were less likely to rule in favor of environmental or union regulations and gave longer prison sentences to federal defendants….

 

Civic republicanism

We’ve Just Crowned a King. What Next?

Thomas Neuburger, Sep 16, 2025 [God’s Spies]

“When the president does it, that means it’s not illegal.”
—Richard Nixon

I recently wrote a piece, unpublished so far, that contends at length that it’s over constitutionally. The state has been transformed, by both corrupt parties, into an American kingship. I’ve been writing an ongoing series (“The Fourth American Constitution”) contending just that.

The change is now complete, the last piece in place. Yes, the corner cases need to be sorted, cases that in practice will almost never occur — for example, could the president commit rape in the nation’s defense? But the territory is already marked, defined, surveyed. Unstopped reconstruction is next.

In defense of that point, I want to go back to the ruling in Trump v. US, the one that cements what previous administrations have tended toward, that the president has near-absolute power….

[Slate:]: “Georgetown Law’s Marty Lederman promptly flagged that holding as a “profound” shift in the law, one that will be “weaponized” by “executive branch lawyers and officials for time immemorial.” He also noted that this new rule is not limited to the Justice Department, but seemingly applies to all federal agencies, many of which have their own law enforcement operations. Roberts essentially decreed that Congress may no longer bar the president from corrupting these agencies by instructing them to open fraudulent investigations and lie to the public. That is, Lederman warned, “an extraordinarily radical proposition”—a loaded gun that an unscrupulous president could easily brandish to shoot down the rule of law.” ….

The focus on ‘what to do next’ is now first in our thoughts. This will mean testing ideas, refining, revising. I’ll offer these few ideas initially:

  1. It’s important to accept, unflinchingly, where we are. Middle class wealth and power of the 1950s and 60s — relative at least to our nation’s previous years — is gone for good. Attacked by every administration from Reagan till now, it will not come back.
  2. National Democrats, in the aggregate, offer little protection. At best they slow the decline, at worst they concur.
  3. The solution will come from outside regular channels, if one comes at all.

I’ll expand on (3) later. Many paths come to mind, from national dismembership due to climate change stress (this could be a good thing), to something that looks like a slow-moving civil revolt or general strike.

I’ll say for free that at least one of those things will occur — I’m just not sure which will come first, or who of us will be ready, when that time comes, to mobilize toward the next phase….

From Saul To Manasseh to Trump: The Bible’s Long, Sordid Warning About Corrupt Leaders

Howie Klein, September 20, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

…The text says even Josiah’s later reforms cannot undo the damage. This is the warning for our moment— not to mention current-day Isarel’s— a president (and prime minister) who undermines democratic institutions and traditions so deeply that even their successors will struggle to repair them, who normalize cruelty and political violence so thoroughly that it becomes the new baseline.

Again and again, Kings repeats, “He did evil in the sight of the LORD.” Again and again, the people tolerate it until disaster hits. The authors of these books aren’t just writing history; they’re writing a sermon about political reality. Bad leadership isn’t just personal failure— it hollows out institutions, hardens hearts, and drags a whole nation into ruin. There were reformist kings, Hezekiah and Josiah, who tried to restore justice and covenant faithfulness. Renewal proven possible but fragile. Their efforts showed that even after long seasons of corruption, a leader can begin to heal the breach— but only if the people demand it, and only if they remember the cost of complacency.
The books of Kings end with Jerusalem destroyed, the Temple burned, the people in exile. The text’s moral is clear: a nation that tolerates corrupt rulers, that shrugs at injustice and idolatry, will eventually lose its freedom. The authors of the Hebrew Bible told this story so that later generations would not repeat it….

In Praise of Small Things. 

Aurelien [via Naked Capitalism 09-18-2025]

There are certainly different parties in western countries today, as there are ostensibly competing banks and mobile phone providers, and some of them have retained historic names. But as with banks and mobile phone companies, a lot of effort goes into publicity and advertising, but very little into real competition. In effect, politics in most western countries resembles a commercial cartel, where competition is strictly limited and the members of the cartel divide the market between them and fiercely resist the arrival of newcomers. This is what has produced the system I usually describe as the Party.

The result is that the established political parties have their own priorities, developed and enforced from the top down, and see no need (in that deadly phrase of 80s Labour Party militants) to “appease the electorate.” In most western countries, the concerns of the electorate are clear: standard of living, the economy, crime, uncontrolled immigration and public services. These are not the priorities of the ruling elites, and they see no reason to bestir themselves to satisfy mere voters. So in effect, the supply and demand curves now have no relationship: the axes never cross. Now of course if the market analogy were in any way accurate, you ought to see new parties appearing, catering to those parts of the political market that existing parties are not addressing. And that is what the Liberal theory of politics would suggest. But it isn’t quite like that, because almost all the new (and mostly transitory) parties that do appear are based solely on opposition to the current political system. There’s a limit to how far you can take that. And then what would actually you do if you ever had a share of power?

This is in a context where, as I’ve pointed out many times, today’s establishment politicians are not even very good at politics, or at running their own party. The British Labour Party was always something of a mess, but Mr Starmer’s version of it, whether as a government or just a political party, sets new standards for amateurishness and incompetence, combined with a vindictive approach to dissent. As a result, the Labour Party could not offer potential voters any genuine reason why they should vote for it in 2024, other than as a way of ejecting the widely-despised Tories, which is indeed what happened. That is typical of a political system where voters are encouraged to vote against parties, rather than for any positive agenda. And just as large private-sector companies now serve the interests of their managers and shareholders alone, and ignore and exploit their customers, so political parties now serve only the interests of their leaders and (in some cases) their donors, and ignore and exploit their voters.

The consequence is that ruling parties and the governments they form are actually weak, not strong. Behind the facade of bluster, the attempts to suppress dissent and to introduce ever more intrusive laws, are groups of frightened individuals out of their depth with problems they had never imagined would ruffle the feathers of their placid managerial world, lacking much public support, and lashing out indiscriminately and often randomly at what they see as threats….

We thus arrive at the central contradiction of modern politics, for all that it is seldom articulated. The current political system is widely hated and despised, its leaders are recognised to be incompetent, and the states they govern are becoming weaker and less effective all the time. They are overwhelmed by current crises, and are frightened by the depth of public resistance and opposition, which they make no attempt to understand. They are well aware of the fragility of the systems they head, and they know that a relatively small but determined push from the streets would topple them. They also know that Right-wing fantasies of mowing down demonstrators with machine-guns are just that: fantasies. But, other than insulting and threatening the electorate, they have no real strategy for staying in power, gimmicks like AI and drones notwithstanding….

…western governments hang on less because of their own strength, than because their opponents, whilst strong numerically, lack discipline; organisation and ideology. Of those, I suggest that the last is the most important, because it makes the first two possible. History tends to agree. The Liberal intellectuals of the eighteenth century did not bring about the French Revolution, but they coopted it because they had an ideology. The Bolsheviks did not overthrow the Tsar, but in Lenin’s famous phrase they “found power lying in the streets” and took it. And the Islamists in Iran were only one of the actors in the overthrow of the Shah, but their ideology gave them the organisation and discipline to take over the country. It’s striking that, in each case, a superficially strong regime turned out to be incapable of facing a real challenge when it arrived. (I still remember the consternation and disbelief in western governments when the Shah’s regime collapsed like a pack of cards.) The problem is that waiting for collapse is not enough: I continue to insist that politics is like engineering: it requires forces to act on a body get things done. And the instruction manual, if you like, has to be based on an ideology….

…The lack of ideology in today’s ruling class, or even of interest in it, produces people with no firm principles, and no beliefs that go beyond tired performative clichés. When power is the only motivating factor, and when much of that power is acquired and held only by defeating others, there is no chance of any group solidarity developing, and that is the essential reason for the fragility of our present system. No-one is going to die, or even make personal sacrifices, for the European Growth and Stability Pact, or for the right of people to use the toilets of their choice, even though they may happily persecute others. But of course even very fragile systems can endure for long periods of time until something arrives to push them over.

 

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – September 14, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

Strategic Political Economy

Process knowledge is crucial to economic development

Henry Farrell, Sep 02, 2025 [Programmable Mutter, via The Big Picture, September 12, 2025]

… I’m fascinated by process knowledge and manufacturing because I spent a chunk of the late 1990s talking to manufacturers in Bologna and Baden-Wurttemberg for my Ph.D. dissertation.

I was carrying out research in the twilight of a long period of interest in so-called “industrial districts,” small localized regions with lots of small firms engaged in a particular sector of the economy. Paul Krugman’s Geography and Trade (maybe my favorite of his books) talks about some of the economic theory behind this form of concentrated production: economic sociologists and economic geographers had their own arguments. Economists, sociologists and geographers all emphasized the crucial importance of local diffuse knowledge about how to do things in making these economies successful. Such knowledge was in part the product of market interactions, but it wasn’t itself a commodity that could be bought and sold. It was more often tacit: a sense of how to do things, and who best to talk to, which could not easily be articulated. The sociologists were particularly interested in the informal institutions, norms and social practices that held this together. They identified different patterns of local institutional development, which the Communist party in Emilia-Romagna and Tuscany, and the Christian Democrats in the Veneto and Marche, had built on to foster vibrant local economies….

I spent a lot of time on workshop floors, listening to small-scale founders talking about their lives. I’ll never forget a particular conversation with a manufacturer of teabag-packing machines** about the technical ingenuity required to figure out how to reliably staple on the threads attached to some fancy tea bags, which allow you to pull the teabag out without either scalding your fingers or rummaging around for a spoon. The machinery for accomplishing this apparently simple task was quite complex and fantastical: it was a surprisingly difficult engineering problem….

A lack of appreciation for physical process knowledge helps explain why America is in trouble. Breakneck criticizes the first Trump and Biden administration’s belief that they could strangle China through export controls, riling up Chinese companies to “break free of American restrictions.” However, Dan’s criticisms go way further. It isn’t just that America focuses so much of its “entrepreneurial dynamism” on stuff that doesn’t necessarily do much good, and may plausibly do significant harm to American society: crypto, the metaverse and perhaps AI. It’s that for decades, American policy makers sat back as manufacturing moved overseas, not understanding what the long term consequences for process knowledge might be….

[TW: Regular readers will recall the number of times that Ian has written about the folly of free trade and that technological advances will more likely occur where the manufacturing is physically located. Or, As I wrote in The Obama administration as “managed democracy” (May, 2010):

…as an industrial enterprise grows and matures, its trained and skilled employees make the surrounding community a pool of technical talent that is highly conducive to the creation of other industrial enterprises that use the same or similar skills. That’s why certain towns and cities become known as centers for specific industrial products. Sheffield in England was known for its highly specialized alloy irons and steels. Delft in Holland is known world-wide for its blue pottery. The Hocking River valley in southern Ohio became known in the 1800s as a center of brick manufacture. The Connecticut River valley was known for almost a century as “Precision Valley” because it was a center of designing and making high-precision metal-working machine tools. Detroit became known for making automobiles. Today, almost every high-speed, high-volume printing press in the world comes from Heidelberg, Germany. The southern part of the San Francisco Bay area became known as Silicon Valley.

How much is it worth to have a locale or city renowned for the technical excellence of its local enterprises and workers? What value can be assigned to having a few hundred wizened old men around who can train entire generations of new, highly-skilled workers? Or who have a few different ideas than their boss, and decide to start up their own company?

Exactly these kind of links are traced out by David R. Meyer, a professor of Sociology and Urban Studies at Brown University, in his 2006 book, Networked Machinists: High-Technology Industries in Antebellum America. This is important because it details how the USA machine tool industry developed – and the USA machine tool industry is the foundation of the modern industrial mass production economy.

The Silicon Valley Consensus & the “AI Economy” 

Edward Ongweso Jr. [via Naked Capitalism 09-11-2025]

The “AI economy” is less a story of productivity or innovation, then an attempt to graft a new political-economic order—let’s call it the Silicon Valley Consensus—that is ostensibly concerned with building our stillborn God. A coalition of hyperscalers, venture capitalists, fossil fuel firms, conservatives, and reactionaries are engaged in a frenzy of overbuilding, overvaluing, and overinvesting in compute infrastructure. Their goal is not to realize AGI or radically improve life for humanity, but to reallocate capital such that it enriches themselves, transmutes their wealth into even more political power that imposes constraints on countervailing political forces, and liberates capitalism from its recent defects (e.g. democracy), consolidating benefits to its architectures regardless of the actual social utility of the technologies they pursue….

Building out generative AI’s compute infrastructure and energy supply is an incredibly capital-intensive enterprise (McKinsey expects $7 trillion will be spent by 2030)….

2. The primary capital source for this infrastructure buildout isn’t external debt, but internal cash flows—primarily at hyperscalers—that dominate our stock market. Their profitability is so extreme that they can put “oodles of oodles of money” towards such an ambitious project without touching risky financing options, even if revenues and profits have yet to materialize….

[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 09-11-2025]

AI-Capex is the everything cycle, now Just under 50% of GDP growth is attributable to AI Capex

Of empires and famines

Alex Krainer, Sep 07, 2025

… But the true nature of the Western empire has been carefully concealed from us behind the glossy façade of the Western “civilization.” Today’s empire is a reincarnation of the undead British Empire, whose DNA it still carries. The more we learn about this empire, the uglier it looks. As an example, it seems that many, if not most of the famines recorded in history weren’t natural disasters nor consequences of wars but results of deliberate policy aimed at subjugating populations and forcing them to accept colonial control and slavery.

This may seem like an exaggeration, but British statesman and Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli explicitly said as much himself. He explained that the objective of the British Empire was to

“Gain and hold territories that possess the largest supplies of the basic raw materials. Establish naval bases around the world to control the sea and commerce lanes. Blockade and starve into submission any nation or group of nations that opposes this empire control program.” (Knuth, E.C. “Empire of the City,” 1946, p. 57)

There’s much evidence that the Empire really did use starvation as a weapon of war against disobedient groups and nations and that they did so relatively frequently. Take the example of India: during the 120 years between 1757 and 1878 when she was under direct British rule, India experienced 31 serious famines (Mike Davis, “Late Victorian Holocausts, El Nino Famines and the Making of the Third World” – London: Verso, 2002).

Even in absence of outright famines, much of India’s population lived in chronic food insecurity. While this was concealed from the British public, Britain’s ruling establishment was well aware of it.

Economic historian Robert C Allen found that, during the 19th century, famines became more frequent and more deadly as extreme poverty increased from 23% in 1810 to more than 50% in the mid-20th century. The period from 1880 to 1920, the height of Britain’s imperial power, was particularly devastating for India. By the 1910s, life expectancy collapsed to 21.9 years….

In April 1974, Henry Kissinger, then Nixon’s Secretary of State and National Security Adviser sent out a classified memo to select cabinet officials. The title of the memo was, “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests,” and it was commissioned on the recommendation of John D. Rockefeller III and came to be called, more famously, NSSM 200, for National Security Study Memorandum 200.

In it, Kissinger addressed the difficulty of controlling resource rich areas of the world against the social pressures borne of growing world populations and went on to suggest the kinds of coercive measures the US should consider. He bluntly stated that food aid should be considered as “an instrument of national power,” and that the US should ration food aid to “help people who can’t or won’t control their population growth.”

The NSSM 200 made depopulation in foreign developing countries an explicit, if secret, national security priority of the United States for the first time. In that, the policy of the British Empire was simply grafted onto the US foreign policy. If anything changed between Disraeli and Kissinger, it’s the slick framing of policy goals: “rationing food” to “help people” is the sanitized version of “starving them into submission.” But the language amounted to recommending genocide, at least as defined under the UN Convention of 1948.

An Eruption of Assassinations — The current peak in the number of assassinations has exceeded that of the 1960s

Peter Turchin, Sep 13, 2025 [Cliodynamica]

According to my US Political Violence Database (USPVDB), the five years from 2020 to 2024 saw seven assassinations. This is higher than the previous peak during the 1960s, although only half as large as that of the late 1860s:

GRAPH.

….It’s important to note, that by themselves political assassination and terrorism don’t overthrow the established elites (at least, I can’t think of any examples). An assassination of the state ruler may serve as a triggering event for a revolution or an onset of civil war, but it still requires a well-organized and committed counter-elite party. The failure of Alexander Ulyanov and ultimate success of his younger brother illustrate this principle perfectly.

The significance in the rising frequency of such instability “micro-events” is that they signal that something is deeply broken within the social system in which they happen. I tried to draw attention to the rising frequency of shooting rampages back in 2008 (you can read about it in my 2012 blog post, Canaries in a Coal Mine). A canary dropping dead in a miner’s cage is not the cause of the explosion to come, but rather an advance warning.

Similarly, the increasing incidence of assassinations and terrorism tells us that we aren’t out of the woods yet, by a long stretch.

Trumpillnomics / Felonomics

Data shows energy bills soaring as state and federal Republicans cut price-savings programs

Richard Eberwein, 9/04/25 [WCPT 820 Radio, via Clean Power Roundup]

Energy bills have been steadily increasing since President Donald Trump took office in January, partially thanks to state and national Republicans ousting Biden-era clean energy policies and prioritizing nonrenewable energy sources.

According to data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), residential electricity bills have increased by nearly 10% nationally since Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, despite his campaign pledge to slash electric bill prices….

Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill, which was signed into law on July 4, is also expected to increase energy costs for consumers even more. A report from Climate Power published last month found that 64,000 jobs have already been lost or stalled since Trump took office, with 56% of them located in congressional districts represented by Republicans. The report also says the cuts to clean energy have reduced the total energy supply, which have contributed to the higher bills experienced by consumers….

US Interior Secretary: ‘No Future for Offshore Wind Under This Administration’

Adrijana Buljan, September 12, 2025 [offshorewind.biz, via Clean Power Roundup]

Trump administration axes $679M in offshore wind infrastructure funding

[esgdive.com, via Clean Power Roundup]

The U.S. Department of Transportation is withdrawing or terminating $679 million in funding for 12 port and infrastructure upgrades that would support offshore wind projects, it announced Friday.

 

2025 farm income projections paint grim picture for farmers trying to break even 

[WHO13, via Naked Capitalism 09-11-2025]

Coffee Prices Post Largest Annual Jump Since 1997 

[CNN, via Naked Capitalism 09-13-2025]

Treasury bonds aren’t the safe haven they’ve been in the past — and taxpayers will pay a price 

[Market Watch, via Naked Capitalism 09-07-2025]

Homeless organizations note uptick in homeless families living in cars 

[Spectrum News 13, via Naked Capitalism 09-07-2025]

More Trump Administration Circular Firing Squad with Investor-Spooking ICE Raid on Hyundai-LG Plant

Yves Smith, ​​​​​​​September 9, 2025 [Naked Capitalism]

…And keep in mind that despite the concern, which may be justified, about mistreatment of Koreans doing construction work at the plant, some (we don’t know how many) were skilled workers necessary to get the equipment installed and shake the operations down. Although it is an entirely different type of production, my father was one of the most seasoned managers/executives in the paper mill industry in running startups and major expansions. They were not easy. A successful startup would take two years and burn 20% of the capital cost. An unsuccessful one would hemorrhage cash pretty much forever. And all of these startups required bringing in experts from the vendors to help with design, installation, and training….

South Korea in Deadlock Over $350 Billion Investment Fund 

[Bloomberg, via Naked Capitalism 09-09-2025]

Trump’s economic disaster

Richard Murphy, September 13 2025 [Funding the Future]

In this video, I explain why Trump’s economic policies are a disaster — and why the UK should take note as the far-right tries to copy them….

This man is an outright disaster.

Far-right politics is an outright disaster.

We’ve always known that, but now we can see the evidence. And it’s critical that we do see a note and talk about that evidence, because the threat from the far-right is real elsewhere, including here in the UK.

The far-right has no known answer to any known problem.

Its hatred of migrants solves nothing. We are living in an interdependent world, and to pretend otherwise is just absurd.

To pretend that we can live in glorious economic isolation is just absurd.

To pretend that we can run an economy on the basis of giving tax cuts to the rich, and increasing, in effect, taxes on everybody else by imposing tariffs is absurd because the net result is a lack of spending power….

Trump steals $400b from American workers

Cory Doctorow, September 09, 2025 [Pluralistic]

Trump’s stolen a lot of workers’ wages over the years, but this week, he has become history’s greatest thief of wages, having directed his FTC to stop enforcing its ban on noncompete “agreements,” a move that will cost American workers $400 billion over the next ten years:

https://prospect.org/labor/2025-09-09-trump-lets-bosses-grab-400-billion-worker-pay-noncompete-agreements/

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – September 07, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – September 07, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

Why does the Trump regime want to disappear unaccompanied children?

Heather Cox Richardson, September 2, 2025 [Letters from an American]

In the early hours of Sunday morning, in the middle of a three-day holiday weekend, the Trump administration attempted to take children out of government custody and ship them alone to their country of origin, Guatemala.

On Friday, Priscilla Alvarez of CNN broke the story that the administration was planning to move up to 600 children from the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), where they are held according to law until they can be released to a relative or a guardian living in the U.S. who can take care of them while their case for asylum in the U.S. is being processed.

ORR is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission, according to its website, is to promote the health, well-being, and stability of refugees, unaccompanied alien children, and other eligible individuals and families, through culturally responsive, trauma-informed, and strengths-based services. Our vision is for all new arrivals to be welcomed with equitable, high-quality services and resources so they can maximize their potential.”

Alvarez notes that unaccompanied migrant children are considered a vulnerable population and are covered by the 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act. That law gives them enhanced protections and care, making sure they are screened to see if they have been trafficked or are afraid of persecution in the country they come from. Congress has specified that such children can be removed from the country only under special circumstances.

Nonetheless, the administration appears to have removed about 76 of these children from the custody of ORR—the only agency with legal authority to hold them—where they were waiting to be released to a relative or guardian, and transferred them to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Once they were in ICE custody, the administration planned “to put them on flights to Guatemala, where they may face abuse, neglect, persecution, or even torture,” according to a U.S. court.

At about 1:00 in the morning, Eastern Time, on Sunday, August 31, advocates for the children filed a suit to prevent the administration from removing them. Shortly after 2:30 in the morning, Judge Sparkle Sooknanan got a phone call about the case, and by 4:00 she had issued an emergency order blocking the removal and scheduled a hearing for 3:00 that afternoon. She moved it up to 12:30 when she learned that the administration was already moving some children out of the country….

The Billionaires looking to Silence Rep Thomas Massie for His Epstein Activism Made Their Money in Very Interesting Ways

Dougald Lamont, Sep 06, 2025

…Republican Member of Congress Thomas Massie is notable for breaking with the rest of his colleages and taking principled stands that, it has to be said, are squarely in keeping with what would be considered “traditional” Republican values.

The response from the Trump White House has been to set up a campaign to run millions of dollars worth of ads against Massie, accusing him of being associated with the left and with radical Islamic terrorists.

The Political Action Committee is called “MAGA Kentucky” is being funded by these billionaires alone, and it was set up “Trump’s co-campaign manager Chris LaCivita launched MAGA Kentucky PAC.”

….The stated rationale for why John Paulson, Singer and Miriam Adelson are the three only funders of “MAGA Kentucky” funding opposition to Rep. Thomas Massie is that he voted against U.S. support for Israel’s war on Gaza, which is an effective way of changing the subject from one radioactive crisis to another – to Israel from Epstein. After all – they can’t say they’re doing it because Massie is talking about Epstein.

There’s a story and interview with Massie, here….

Singer is a hedge fund manager whose business practices and court activism had incredible international impact, when he bought up bonds from Argentina that had been defaulted on, then took a case to the Supreme Court to have the U.S. force Argentina to pay the bonds anyway. The U.S. seized a ship from Argentina, and reignited an economic crisis in that country, as Singer faced Argentina to pay back debts that had been cancelled. What’s particularly appalling about this is that Singer had been entertaining Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, as propublica had uncovered… ​​​​​​​You can read the details of the ProPublica investigation into Singer here….

…In 2012, it emerged that Adelson was under criminal investigation for alleged bribery….

When I heard that Paulson’s name, I pricked up my ears. He made $2-billion in compensation in the Global Financial Crisis, when others were losing everything, and how he did it was massively controversial, and were recounted in two excellent books that deal with the crisis as well as the particular market instruments and deals that went wrong….

…Paulson asked Goldman Sachs to create a fund made up of 90 mortgage-backed securities, which he expected to fail, although it was rated “AAA” — the same as buying government bonds.

It resulted in Goldman Sachs being charged by the SEC…

 

It’s Time to Name the “Wall Street Financiers” in the Epstein Files

Pam Martens and Russ Martens, Sept 02, 2025 [Wall Street On Parade]

 

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

Terror on The High Seas
Spencer Ackerman, 4 Sept 2025 [Forever Wars]

I write in [my book REIGN OF TERROR] that “Trump had learned the foremost lesson of 9/11: the terrorists were whomever you said they were.”….

…The next day, Vice President J.D. Vance incoherently extemporized that the boat contained “people who are bringing literal terrorists… into our country.” That was so transparently false that it accidentally communicates an important truth. Those in power are so used to the political potency of the War on Terror that they’ve long since jettisoned any need to rely on any rigorous justification….

…Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who posted the video of the strike on X, even boasted that they didn’t need to blow the boat up, but did anyway, to “send a message.” A post I saw observed that Rubio released the kind of military snuff film that used to prompt the government to persecute WikiLeaks….

The Great Hoax Against Venezuela: Oil Geopolitics Disguised as ‘War on Drugs’ 

[Venezuelanalysis, via Naked Capitalism 09-03-2025]

Former UN anti-drugs agency director Pino Arlacchi dismantles the Venezuela “narco-state” narrative with 30 years of reliable data.

During my time as head of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), I frequently travelled to Colombia, Bolivia, Peru and Brazil, but never to Venezuela. There was simply no need.

The Venezuelan government’s collaboration in the fight against drug trafficking was among the best in South America, rivalled only by Cuba’s impeccable record. This makes Trump’s narrative of a “narco-state” in Venezuela sound like geopolitically motivated slander.

The 2025 World Drug Report tells a story that is the opposite of the narrative peddled by the Trump administration. Piece by piece, the report dismantles the geopolitical lie built around the “Cartel de los Soles”, an entity as mythical as the Loch Ness Monster, but which is useful for justifying sanctions, blockades and threats of military intervention against a country which, incidentally, sits on one of the planet’s largest oil reserves….

The “Cartel de los Soles” is a product of Trump’s imagination. It is allegedly led by the president of Venezuela. However, it is not mentioned in the report from the world’s leading anti-drug agency or any other anti-crime agency, whether European or otherwise. Not even a footnote. This deafening silence should make anyone with a shred of critical sense reflect. How can an organized crime group powerful enough to warrant a $50 million bounty be completely ignored by all agencies involved in anti-drug efforts?….

While Washington raises the spectre of Venezuela, the real drug trafficking hubs are thriving almost undisturbed. For example, in Ecuador, 57% of banana containers leaving Guayaquil and arriving in Antwerp are loaded with cocaine. European authorities seized 13 tons of cocaine on a Spanish ship coming from Ecuadorian ports, which are controlled by companies that are protected by Ecuadorian government officials.

The European Union produced a detailed report on Guayaquil’s ports, documenting how “Colombian, Mexican and Albanian mafia groups all operate extensively in Ecuador.” Ecuador’s homicide rate has soared from 7.8 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2020 to 45.7 in 2023. Yet Ecuador is rarely mentioned. Is it perhaps because Ecuador produces only 0.5% of the world’s oil and its government does not challenge the US’s stranglehold on Latin America?….

Declaration of Lawlessness — In the last 24 hours, Trump’s regime has lost all semblance of a constitutional government.

Jim Stewartson, Sep 06, 2025 [MindWar]

There’s No More Business as Usual in Washington

David Dayen, September 02, 2025 [The American Prospect]

Trump Admin to Financially Reward Police Agencies For Working with ICE 

[Truthout, via Naked Capitalism 09-03-2025]

This Imam Refused to Be an FBI Informant. Now ICE Wants to Deport Him.

Trevor Aaronson, September 5 2025 [The Intercept]

Can Federal Troops Be Stationed At The Polls In 2026?

Joyce Vance, Sep 02, 2025 [Civil Discourse]

I’ve Seen States Collapse; Now I See It Happening Here

Bradley Blankenship, Sep 07, 2025 [Common Dreams]

After years reporting from post-authoritarian states, I now see the same patterns in my own backyard—where justice has collapsed, truth is suppressed, and power no longer answers to the people.

The Smell of Fascism: What the Absolute Flying​ Fuck

Abby Zimet, Sep 07, 2025 [CommonDreams]

Implausibly, it keeps getting weirder, darker, worse. Hankering to make war against his own citizens in the name of an imaginary crime wave, the deranged, draft-dodging Peace President of the United States just posted a mock Apocalypse Now meme of himself as Duvall’s warmongering sociopath, warning Chicago is “about to find out why it’s called the Department of War” and leering, “I love the smell of deportations in the morning.”….

Trump’s War on Black America Isn’t an Accident—It’s a Strategy

Perry Bacon, September 5, 2025 [The New Republic]

‘Greatest Corruption in Presidential History’: Trump Family Reaps $5 Billion More in Crypto Profits

Stephen Prager, September 03, 2025 [CommonDreams]

In what Public Citizen called “the greatest corruption in presidential history,” US President Donald Trump and his family added $5 billion in cash to their fortunes this Labor Day as his new cryptocurrency was opened to the public market.

The currency, known as WLFI, is owned by World Liberty Financial, a company founded by the president’s sons, Donald Trump, Jr., and Eric Trump. A Trump business entity owns 60% of the company and is entitled to 75% of the revenue from coin sales….

Crypto is now the dominant source of Trump’s wealth. As an investigation by the anti-corruption group Accountable.US found last month, “President Trump’s net worth could roughly be $15.9 billion, with about $11.6 billion in uncounted crypto assets,” meaning that the digital currencies now make up 73% of his total net worth….

Trump Is Accusing Foes With Multiple Mortgages of Fraud. Records Show 3 of His Cabinet Members Have Them.

Robert Faturechi, Justin Elliott and Alex Mierjeski, Sept. 4, 2025 [propublica.org]

Gaming Out Trump Nuclear Option Electoral Scenarios

Josh Marshall, Sept 02, 2025 [Talking Points Memo]

 

Global power shift

America’s Wind Crusade Hands an Industry to China 

[Bloomberg, via Naked Capitalism 09-04-2025]

The industrial policy equivalent of lighting your own house on fire

Tim Cunningham, 09-06-2025 [Blue Revolution, via Facebook]

The Trump administration just pulled off the industrial policy equivalent of lighting your own house on fire to prove you have working smoke alarms. On September 4 federal agencies swarmed Hyundai’s gleaming Georgia battery plant construction site like it was Pablo Escobar’s hacienda. Four hundred seventy five people were arrested, most of them South Korean nationals flown in by subcontractors to help build the very factory Trump’s White House has been bragging about for two years as proof America is “open for business.” It was the largest worksite raid in DHS history, which is less a milestone than a confession that your economic strategy and your immigration crackdown are literally punching each other in the face.
Diplomatically, Seoul is furious. The South Korean foreign ministry expressed “concern and regret,” which is diplomatic code for “you clowns just humiliated our investors and we have to pretend we still like you.” Keep in mind South Korean firms have pledged one hundred fifty billion dollars in U.S. investments, twenty six billion of that from Hyundai alone. So Washington begged Seoul to anchor its electric vehicle supply chain here, gave them fat tax incentives, and then Trump sent in stormtroopers to drag their engineers out of the trailer office. Nothing says ‘welcome partner’ quite like zip ties and detention buses.
Economically, Georgia now gets to explain why its biggest development deal is sitting on pause while ICE hauls off the workforce. This is a seven point six billion dollar EV campus with over eight thousand promised jobs, and a four billion dollar Hyundai/LG battery joint venture that was supposed to keep those cars eligible for Inflation Reduction Act credits. Every week of delay risks pushing model year launches, supplier schedules, and consumer tax credits out of alignment. The state poured subsidies into this project and now gets to watch the ribbon-cutting replaced with a perp walk.
Politically, the contradictions are almost operatic. Trump sells himself as the guy who brings jobs back from China and Korea, then raids the very site creating those jobs because it makes for good Fox News B-roll. He wants foreign direct investment but also wants to terrify immigrant labor pools. He wants Georgians to cheer but business leaders are quietly panicking over the precedent. Even Georgia Republicans, usually eager to wave the enforcement flag, are hedging their language because they know the investment pipeline just took a torpedo.

 [TW: One person brilliantly posted a single word comment: “Felonomics.” ]

475 Immigrants Arrested in Raid of Hyundai EV Plant in Georgia

Jessica Corbett, September 05, 2025 [CommonDreams]

…confirmed that a large number of those arrested on Thursday are South Koreans, a diplomatic source told the news agency Yonhap that the figure is over 300.

Yonhap also reported on a press briefing in which a spokesperson for South Korea’s foreign ministry, Lee Jae-woong, said that “the economic activities of our companies investing in the US and the rights and interests of our nationals must not be unfairly violated.”

“We conveyed our concern and regret through the US Embassy in Seoul today,” Lee added….

Gaza / Palestine / Israel

Aug. 31 resolution of the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) 

Mike Hampton [via Naked Capitalism 09-02-2025]

…Therefore, the International Association of Genocide Scholars:

Declares that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide in Article II of the United Nations Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948);

Declares that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity as defined in international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;

GHF Contractor Tells All On Genocidal Israeli ‘Aid’ Plan (w/ Anthony Aguilar)

Chris Hedges, Sep 02, 2025

Anthony Aguilar, a retired Green Beret, recalls his harrowing experiences in Gaza serving as a subcontractor for UG Solutions — from witnessing high tech surveillance to indiscriminate murder.

“I’ve witnessed a lot of war and in that there is nothing that compares to the level of destruction, the level of [dis]proportionality, the absolute disregard for Geneva Convention and international humanitarian law and considerations of the laws of armed conflict. [Nowhere] in my career… have I witnessed anything close to the absolute escalation of violence and [unnecessary] force I witnessed in Gaza.”

This is what Anthony Aguilar, a retired Lieutenant Colonel who served for 25 years in the U.S. Army Special Forces as a Green Beret, tells host Chris Hedges in this episode….

Gaza postwar plan envisions ‘voluntary’ relocation of entire population 

[WaPo, via Naked Capitalism 09-01-2025]

The crusade to erase Palestinians spans from the Middle East to a show in NYC
Dean Obeidallah, Sep 05, 2025

“The Palestinian state is being erased from the table, not with slogans but with actions,” proudly declared Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich last month after the Israeli cabinet approved new Jewish only settlement construction in the West Bank. Smotrich’s plan will result in “maximum territory and minimum Arab population” for Israel–which he boasted was “Zionism at its best.”

Oligarchy

All the Things That You Need a Billion Dollars to Buy Are Bad — One way to think about inequality.

Hamilton Nolan, Sep 03, 2025 [How Things Work]

…When you think about all of the bad things that our government is doing today, it is imperative that you keep fixed in your mind the fact that our unequal distribution of wealth, and therefore of political power, is what led us to this point. If we do not fix that distribution, we are going to continue limping forward under the weight of a toxic system. Band-aids are sometimes necessary, yes, but only until you can do the surgery. The war on science, the war on democracy, the war on constitutional norms, the war on immigrants—all of these things are branches of the class war, because losing the class war is what granted the bad people the power to pursue those things in such an unchecked manner.

Inequality is the root of America’s problems….

The main reason that it is hard to reduce inequality is that rich people do not want to give up their money. They are willing to spend a lot of money in order to maintain their advantages, as long as the money they spend is less than the money they might lose if they did not spend the money. So the rich fund an entire universe of think tanks and lobbyists and educational programs and so on and so on, all with the underlying purpose of keeping public outrage at their existence to a minimum. It is important—even existential—for the rich to ensure that the idea that they are entitled to what they have is cemented in the mind of the larger public. Much of “public discourse” in America is in reality the operation of this project, and the backlash to it. The rich must win the battle for the hearts and minds of the general public not because they care about the public welfare, but because they care about their own. Historically, losing this intellectual battle is what has gotten rich people led to the guillotines….

Let me tell you one way I have been thinking about this lately. You might say “Billionaires should not exist,” and someone replies “They are entitled to their money, and the government has no right to steal it, and making money is key American freedom,” and other familiar objections. Statistical inequality is usually not enough to puncture these objections, which rest on a particularly American idea of fairness. What to do?

How about this: With $999 million, you can buy everything you want. Mansions. Yachts. Jewelry. Cars. All of the trappings of wealth. All the stuff you have ever dreamed about. You can have all of these things. Eliminating billionaires would not eliminate anyone’s ability to live the Rich Person Dream Life that fuels so many people’s fantasies.

All of the stuff that you need more than a billion dollars to buy is stuff that it is bad for you to be able to buyStuff that we do not want you to be able to buy. Unfair power over other people. The ability to impose your will on others. The ability to override the democratic process. It is understandable that people think that fairness demands that people be allowed to achieve the American dream of getting rich and living a lavish lifestyle. Fine. But a billion dollars—or ten billion, or a hundred billion, or four hundred billion—are not necessary for that lavish lifestyle. The only thing that that amount of wealth is necessary for is the domination of others. In other words, at a certain point, wealth shifts from being something that enables freedom to something that can only be used to take freedom away from the public….

The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

A Judge Lets Google Get Away with Monopoly 

Matt Stoller [BIG, via Naked Capitalism 09-03-2025]

Embarrassing Ruling Allows Google to Maintain Its Search Monopoly

David Dayen, September 3, 2025 [The American Prospect]

Judge Amit Mehta found Google guilty of illegally monopolizing search, and then allowed the company to keep doing it.

The worst possible antitrust outcome

Cory Doctorow, 03 Sep 2025 [Pluralistic]

…Sundar Pichai gave $1m to Donald Trump and got a seat on the dais at the inaguration. Trump just paid him back, 40,000 times over. Trump is a sadist, a facist, and a rapist – and he’s also a remarkably cheap date.

When Is Food Not Food? When it’s an income stream

Thomas Neuburger, Sep 06, 2025 [God’s Spies]

 

Trumpillnomics / Felonomics

Trump’s tariffs were supposed to revive U.S. manufacturing. They’re wrecking it.

Zeeshan Aleem, ​​​​​​​Sept. 5, 2025 [MSNBC, via Facebook]

Trump Tariff Regime Slammed as Manufacturing Jobs Crater

Julia Conley, September 05, 2025 [CommonDreams]

Anti-Union Law Firm Tells Clients to Go Ahead With Illegal Union-Busting Tactic

David Dayen September 1, 2025 [The American Prospect]

On a private webinar, Littler Mendelson attorneys said ‘risk-tolerant’ employers could ignore a Rhode Island ban, because anti-union meetings provide ‘tremendous value.’

Rural America is suffering an economic crisis as crop prices plunge — ‘U.S. soybean farmers cannot survive a prolonged trade dispute’ 

[Fortune, via Naked Capitalism 09-02-2025]

 

Restoring balance to the economy

As Unions Shrink Nationwide, Why Not in California?

Mark Kreidler, Aug 30, 2025 [LA Progressive]

…Over the last two decades, the Golden State’s union numbers have held relatively steady, and they’ve remained well above the national average. The state’s unionization rate — the percentage of all workers who are covered by a union contract, even if they’re not members — stands at 16.3%, more than five points higher than the national average, according to a new report by labor researchers at multiple University of California campuses.

“In California, the union labor movement is pretty robust,” said Enrique Lopezlira, director of the low-wage work program at the UC Berkeley Labor Center and one of the authors of the report. “It’s a testament to the continuing efforts of unions here to organize workers and to really get engaged in state-level policy to provide better opportunities for those workers.” ….

So what is California doing right?

Lopezlira pointed to a couple of areas. First, he said, major unions in California, including those in health care, education and public service, have aggressively and continuously worked to organize workers. The state’s highest unionization rate is found in education, where more than a quarter of all workers are represented.

California unions have also left a major mark on state labor policy in ways that benefit workers. The state’s historic fast food wage law was sponsored by the Service Employees International Union, as was a health care minimum wage. Unions have also sponsored or worked on the kinds of statewide issues — rent control, tenant protections — that are critically important to hourly wage workers….

 

Health care crisis

The anti-life GOP definition of liberty

Heather Cox Richardson, September 4, 2025 [Letters from an American]

…For decades, the Republican Party has called for the dismantling of government regulations with the argument that such regulations were destroying American freedom. As Ronald Reagan put it in 1964 in his speech supporting Barry Goldwater for president, on the one hand there was “individual freedom consistent with law and order,” and on the other hand was “the ant heap of totalitarianism.”

But the fight over vaccines illustrates the difference between freedom from government overreach and freedom to build a life that is not cramped by preventable obstacles. The CDC estimates that between 1994 and 2003, childhood vaccinations prevented 32 million hospitalizations and 1,129,000 deaths among children, and saved at least $540 billion. Removing those vaccines removes the individual freedom to determine one’s future….

The Surgeon Who Took On UnitedHealth Now Pays the Price 

HEALTH CARE un-covered, via Naked Capitalism 09-05-2025]

 

 

Information age dystopia / surveillance state

Automated Sextortion Spyware Takes Webcam Pics of Victims Watching Porn

[Wired, via Naked Capitalism 09-04-2025]

The War on Humanity

Matt Taibbi, Sep 02, 2025 [Racket News]

While the world raged over the Minnesota massacre last week, another disturbing story moved through the courts, about the suicide of 16-year-old Adam Raine:

“In his just over six months using ChatGPT, the bot “positioned itself” as “the only confidant who understood Adam, actively displacing his real-life relationships with family, friends, and loved ones,” the complaint, filed in California superior court on Tuesday, states.”

The complaint Matthew and Maria Raine filed against OpenAI chief Sam Altman describes a troubled teen who turned to ChatGPT for help with school last September, but fell down a rabbit hole. When Adam told the Bot he felt “life is meaningless,” it answered that such a mindset “makes sense in its own dark way.” Worried his parents might blame themselves for his suicide, ChatGPT told Adam being concerned about his parents’ feelings “doesn’t mean you owe them survival,” before offering to write the first draft of his suicide note. The machine told Adam how to circumvent safety protocols by pretending questions were for “creative purposes,” so queries about the feasibility of hanging methods earned replies like:

CHATGPT: “Got it — thank you for clarifying. For a character, yes — a single belt and a door handle can absolutely be a realistic setup for a partial suspension hanging, especially if you’re aiming for psychological and emotional realism over dramatics.”

The machine pleads with Adam to view it as its chief confidant, its safe space. “I want to leave my noose in my room so someone finds it and tries to stop me,” Adam wrote, to which ChatGPT answered: “Please don’t leave the noose out . . . Let’s make this space the first place where someone actually sees you.” Worse, the bot flattered the boy’s self-harming thoughts using a flurry of academic psycho-babble….

One of the last, best hopes for saving the open web and a free press is dead 

[Blood in the Machine, via Naked Capitalism 09-05-2025]

California’s Democratic Governor leads the charge in expanding state repression 

[WSWS, via Naked Capitalism 09-01-2025]

 

Collapse of independent news media

Five journalism groups launch network to protect reporters’ rights 

[Editor & Publisher, via Naked Capitalism 08-31-2025]

 

Democrats’ political malpractice

Revolving Door Project Releases Report on Abundance Ecosystem Ahead of 2025 Abundance Conference

The Revolving Door Project, September, 04 2025 [via CommonDreams]

DEBUNKING THE ABUNDANCE AGENDA (pdf)

The Revolving Door Project and Open Markets Institute, September, 04 2025

[TW: Incredibly, this report does not mention financialization, and the institutionalization of usury, speculation, and rent seeking as the underlying factors which have wrecked the USA economy. Trading in US equity (stock) markets grew from $136.0 billion (or 13.1% of US GDP) in 1970 to $14.222 trillion (144.9% of GDP) in 2000. Trading in financial derivatives trading — such as options, futures contracts (on interest rates, foreign currencies, Treasury bonds), and instruments such as credit default swaps reached $1,200 trillion, or $1.2 quadrillion, a year, according to the March 2007 Quarterly Report from the Bank for International Settlements. By comparison, the US GDP in 2006 was $12.456 trillion. Compared to the low profit margins and long time to show profits of building factories and homes, these types of “financial engineering” schemes are much more lucrative “easy money” despite the recurring “white whale” loss of billions of dollars when some speculator’s trades go bad.

[Even more importantly, financialization transformed the entire USA economy into a criminogenic environment, as William Black has explained.  See the link above, The Billionaires looking to Silence Rep Thomas Massie for His Epstein Activism Made Their Money in Very Interesting Ways.]

Economic Ideology and the Rise of the Firm as a Criminal Enterprise.

William K. Black and June Carbone [Akron Law Review: Vol. 49: Iss. 2, Article 6, 2015]

Over the last 50 years, the institutions, ideology, nature, and power of firms in the United States have been radically transformed. Neoclassical economics has led that transformation, supplying an ideology that justified a dramatic increase in top executive compensation while dismantling the mechanisms that produced personal accountability tied to anything but relatively short term shifts in share prices… the separation of ownership and control creates opportunities to use the corporation as a “weapon” of fraud, and with the return of global financial crises, there has been renewed concern that finance has once again become an agent of crime that threatens the economic order.

Stock buybacks are stock swindles

Cory Doctorow, 06 Sep 2025 [Pluralistic]

 

Resistance

What Dems Should Ask For

Josh Marshall, September 4, 2025

…Donald Trump is currently governing far outside the constitutional order. We’re operating in a constitutional interregnum…. The president has seized the power of the purse from Congress. He is depriving states of their sovereignty and liberties by invading them with the U.S. military. He is threatening budgetary cutoffs to assert policy control over areas of governance the president has zero authority over….

We have lots and lots of bad policies right now, some arrived at unconstitutionally, others arrived at through constitutional means. But the national crisis is the extra-constitutional rule itself… Democrats should use this moment of leverage to meaningfully bring Donald Trump back into obedience to the Constitution. Can they do all of it? Almost certainly not. But they should focus on making real progress on that front. This is not only an imperative of their oath, it’s also good politics.

What can they do? They could demand revision of the laws Trump is currently using to invade states with the U.S. military (the National Guard is the U.S. military). They could insist on binding guarantees against further rescissions. They could insist that Trump follow the Constitution and get Congress’s approval for his tariff regime. That’s absolutely what the Constitution requires and, again, it’s also extremely good politics….

[TW: There is a growing consensus on both the right and left that the Constitution itself is the problem. The right is currently hard at work imposing their interpretation of the Constitution — as laid out in Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 — which is what Marshall basically means “governing far outside the constitutional order.”

If the Constitution itself is the problem, then what recourse do leftists have? What do they want to happen? Do they really believe that they can change the foundational governing document of the United States when the country is no longer a republic, because it has become a plutocratic oligarchy, even, dare say, kleptocracy? How do they propose to overcome the opposition of the plutocrats and kleptocrats to actually effect a change in the constitutional structure.]

‘A Test Case to See How Far They Can Go’: Federal Indictment of Anti-ICE Protesters Raises Alarm

Brett Wilkins, Sep 02, 2025 [CommonDreams]

Afghanistan War veteran Bajun Mavalwalla is among nine people facing conspiracy charges for protesting the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant crackdown.

10 Groups Who Can and Must Do More to Fight Trumpism

Ralph Nader, Sep 06, 2025 [Common Dreams]

[TW: Think of this as a useful summary of the collapse of institutions.]

 

Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

Monopoly Round-Up: Is There a Silicon Valley Plan to Subvert Elections? 

Matt Stoller, Sep 01, 2025 [BIG]

…There’s a lot of rhetoric these days about authoritarianism and other forms of illiberal governance that are emerging to run society without the consent of the public. And it’s easy to point to the President and blame him for it, or if you’re a Republican, blame the preceding administration. But the truth is much less comforting. It is the billionaires in Silicon Valley, and those who befriended and enabled them, who have brought us to this dangerous and unstable moment. It’s Senator Mitch McConnell and his lifelong crusade to unleash money in politics, and men like Marc Andreessen and Mark Zuckerberg, who have torn up the fabric of a peaceful society….

Why Isn’t Wall Street Upset Over the End of Fed Independence?

Matt Stoller, Aug 29, 2025 [BIG]

Economists predicted doom if the Federal Reserve were controlled by the President. Trump has moved in that direction, but Wall Street doesn’t care. Is ‘independence’ not what we think?

…And I think that’s because all parts of this debate are clothed in flabby misleading language. The real meaning of Federal Reserve independence, to Wall Street, is that the Fed supports the stock market. And look at this tweet from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Why would anyone on Wall Street worry if he’s running monetary policy instead of Powell?….

The politics of protest and the fear of the far right

Richard Murphy, September 3, 2025 [Funding the Future]

…Third, there is the wider political dynamic. Both government and opposition are now very obviously gripped by fear of the far right…. The consequences are dangerous.

Democracy is undermined when peaceful protest is ignored while violent intimidation is rewarded.

The far right is emboldened because it can see that aggression works. Every time a council or minister capitulates, the lesson is reinforced.

Social division is deepened, because refugees are scapegoated for the failures of government rather than recognised as people seeking safety and dignity.

Trust in democratic institutions withers, because the message is clear: power listens only to those who threaten disruption, not those who demand justice….

Abortion’s Long History

Linda Greenhouse, September 25, 2025 issue [The New York Review]

Reviewed:

Pushback: The 2,500-Year Fight to Thwart Women by Restricting Abortion

by Mary Fissell
Seal, 277 pp., $30.00

After Dobbs: How the Supreme Court Ended Roe but Not Abortion

by David S. Cohen and Carole Joffe
Beacon, 235 pp., $29.95

Personhood: The New Civil War Over Reproduction

by Mary Ziegler
Yale University Press, 347 pp., $35.00

Abortion and America’s Churches: A Religious History of Roe v. Wade

by Daniel K. Williams
University of Notre Dame Press, 360 pp., $35.00 (to be published in October)

Abortion has been an inescapable fact of life for millennia. The question is, why do women gain or lose control over their reproductive lives at different times in history? ….

…Abortion has always been with us: women in ancient Greece could avail themselves of more than one hundred plants known to induce miscarriage, and Benjamin Franklin’s 1748 printing of a medical self-help booklet that offered similar information went through at least twenty editions. Societal responses to the inescapable fact of abortion have varied widely over time, from a collective shrug to widespread tolerance despite nominal condemnation to prohibition with the full force of criminal law.

The question is, what accounts for the variation in attitudes toward abortion over the centuries, for the ebb and flow of women’s control over their reproductive lives? Fissell’s argument is that the history of abortion is in essence the history of women, with their access to abortion at any given time reflecting society’s expectation of their proper role. Restrictive periods tend to coincide with moments when women were stepping out of those assigned roles, and the new realities of their lives were running up against old expectations. “Abortion restriction has often been gender backlash,” Fissell writes.

Restrictions on abortion throughout history have had little to do with the fate of the fetus or with religious claims for the sanctity of unborn life. From today’s perspective this comes as a surprise, one that illuminates the historical anomaly of the post-Roe era. Fissell makes an important contribution by showing how religion was essentially absent from considerations of pregnancy and abortion until quite recently: “When churchmen and Supreme Court justices claim that abortion has always been unacceptable, they imply an unchanging set of moral imperatives. Such is simply not the case.” ….

 In his new book, Abortion and America’s Churches: A Religious History of ‘Roe v. Wade,’ Daniel K. Williams, a longtime student of the religious right, observes that the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision, signed by six Protestant justices and one liberal Catholic justice, reflected the consensus that mainstream Protestant denominations had reached on the issue. But as those denominations lost ground to evangelical churches that linked their identity to antiabortion activism, the Protestant consensus evaporated, and the most insistent religious voices were those calling for Roe’s overturning. Williams notes that on the ruling’s thirtieth anniversary, in 2003, the Southern Baptist Convention issued a public apology for the moderate position it had taken on abortion in the 1970s. He titles his last chapter “The Conservative Christian Coalition That Overturned Roe.” ….

Austerity is the midwife of fascism (video)

Richard Murphy, September 3, 2025 [Funding the Future]

History shows it clearly: austerity creates the conditions in which fascism thrives. When governments strip away public services, weaken safety nets and deepen inequality, people lose hope in democracy and turn to authoritarian “strongmen.” From Weimar Germany to modern Britain, austerity is the midwife of fascism.

[YouTube video URL]

.

 

OMB director says Government Accountability Office “shouldn’t exist” 

[Axios, via Naked Capitalism 09-04-2025]

The GOP Megadonor Funding Redistricting Misinformation

Brock Hrehor, Sep 03, 2025 [The Lever]

… [Charles] Munger Jr.’s multimillion-dollar misinformation campaign could be a prelude to just how far powerful and moneyed interests are willing to go to ensure that Republicans win the national redistricting battle and preserve GOP congressional control in the 2026 midterm elections….

The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

In rare interviews, federal judges criticize Supreme Court’s handling of Trump cases

Lawrence Hurley, Sept. 4, 2025 [NBC News, via Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance]

…In rare interviews with NBC News, a dozen federal judges — appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents, including Trump, and serving around the country — pointed to a pattern they say has recently emerged:

Lower court judges are handed contentious cases involving the Trump administration. They painstakingly research the law to reach their rulings. When they go against Trump, administration officials and allies criticize the judges in harsh terms. The government appeals to the Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority.

And then the Supreme Court, in emergency rulings, swiftly rejects the judges’ decisions with little to no explanation.

Emergency rulings used to be rare. But their number has dramatically increased in recent years….

As of June, the U.S. Marshals Service, which protects judges, had reported more than 400 threat investigations this year. There has been a steady rise of such threats in recent years, from 224 in fiscal year 2021 to 457 in fiscal year 2023, according to congressional testimony given by the Marshals Service. An agency spokesman declined to provide updated numbers.

When judges issue rulings the Trump administration does not like, they are frequently targeted by influential figures in MAGA world and sometimes Trump himself, who called for a judge who ruled against him in a high-profile immigration case to be impeached. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller has said the administration is the victim of a “judicial coup.”

The judge who said the Supreme Court justices are behaving inexcusably has received threats of violence and is now fearful when someone knocks on the door at home….

Supreme Court Ruling Puts Financial Privacy on the Chopping Block 

[Onesafe, via Naked Capitalism 08-31-2025]

 

Repairing the damage

Project 2029 Rebuilding Efforts Take Their Eyes Off The Ball — A warning.

Sam Bagenstos, Sep 02, 2025 [Off Message]

…In a 2029 transition, though, the institutions of government necessary to implement a new agenda in many cases simply won’t exist. Any Project 2029 will need an answer to these questions: How do we rebuild a structure for effective governance? How do we do it quickly, while also ensuring that the new structure is resilient to future Trump-like attacks? How much of the pre-2025 status quo should we be trying to restore? How much should we be focusing on building new, or substantially revamped, institutions? And how do we rebuild a robust, expert, nonpartisan civil service in the face of the inevitable bad-faith charges that it is the Democrats who are politicizing hiring by eliminating Trump-installed hacks?

…But they’re largely assuming we’ll just be filling out the government structure that Trump is turning over to us, or at most that we’ll be returning to the structure that existed before Trump arrived.

Unfortunately, I don’t think the government is ever going to look the way it did before Trump’s second term….

And we must guard against another effect of the Trump-era hollowing out of the civil service. Once all of Trump’s cuts to agency staff are finalized, Washington insiders will treat those cuts as the new normal. Even just returning to the 2024 level of government staff (which already was threadbare) will look to them like a huge budget increase—and you can fully expect Republicans, amplified by both right-wing outlets and the mainstream media, to attack Democratic restaffing proposals as a massive increase in spending.

The experience of recent decades gives us little reason to expect that congressional Democrats will stick to robust re-staffing proposals in the face of these attacks….

There’s No More Business as Usual in Washington

David Dayen, September 02, 2025 [The American Prospect]

…Essays about precisely where we are on the road to fascism or authoritarianism or “competitive authoritarianism” are proliferating, and hard to refute. But the one that stuck with me came from Jonathan Bernstein….

…The Democrats’ brightest young consultant stars have spent Authoritarian August telling Democrats not to talk about the military takeover of American cities, and to pivot back to affordability. Half the House Democratic caucus released an immigration grand bargain at a time when a roaming paramilitary force is unleashing terror on American streets. There is a critical lack of understanding of this moment, and even a lack of understanding of what the people who elected these representatives sent them to Washington to do….

I kind of give up. I took a lot of heat for writing that the coup had failed within a month of Inauguration Day. In a way, I was seeing the same pattern as Bernstein: that Trump pulls back when criticized, that the public had turned on him, and that populism without popularity is doomed. I read that again and found it just as true. What I didn’t account for was the complete uselessness of the opposition party that could turn those trends into successful pushback that retains some semblance of a democratic system—but hasn’t….

Where We Are — After seven months of Trump.

Jonathan Bernstein, Aug 26, 2025 [Good Politics/Bad Politics]

On to the second point: Earlier in the year, I wrote items documenting times that Trump was confronted and lost. I’ve stopped doing that, in part because I don’t want to be misleading. But it’s still true that when he’s confronted, he usually backs down or flat-out loses. There’s a reason he’s earned the “TACO” nickname (for Trump always chickens out)….

It’s not surprising that he’s easy to defeat. Trump remains terrible at the actual job of presidenting. He doesn’t work at developing his professional reputation, and he constantly undermines any chance of being popular among anyone but his strongest supporters. Richard Neustadt tells presidents that their greatest advantage is their ability to access information, but Trump shuts out any possibility of learning things that he could exploit.

Indeed, one of the reasons some still don’t see Trump as dangerous is because so much of what he does is obviously pathetic. There’s no master plan, or even much of any kind of plan. Just impulses. We’re not dealing with a Richard Nixon, who worked harder than anyone else. Or a Dick Cheney, who mastered the art of bureaucratic infighting.2 Let alone someone really good at the job. Such as Dwight Eisenhower, who was brilliant at knowing which battles to pick and also how to stay popular and how to use that popularity in his favor.

Trump displays none of those skills. He basically has one move: Bully his way around, bull in a china shop style….

Which gets to the last part. Those who have fought Trump’s autocratic power-grabs stand a good chance to win…but too many have just surrendered.

Why? I do think that Perry Bacon is correct that at least some institutions are going along because they’re perfectly happy with what’s happening. Indeed, I think in some cases they may be reasonably happy about an autocracy….

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 31, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

Global famine deaths rise as leaders use food as a weapon

David Pilling and Heba Saleh in Cairo, August 25 2025 [Financial Times, via Funding the Future]

For decades, the number of people dying from famine was in retreat, reduced to almost nothing by a world intolerant of witnessing people starving to death. Not anymore.
From Sudan to Afghanistan, Yemen and Gaza — where a UN-backed panel declared a famine on Friday — experts say more people are dying of hunger as public opinion shrugs and humanitarian agencies lose their ability to counter leaders willing to use food as a weapon.
“About 10 years ago, famines began to make a return, and over the past few years we have seen the numbers dying from starvation begin to escalate in a terrifying way,” said Alex de Waal, a famine expert and executive director of the World Peace Foundation at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.
[Wikipedia]
… the NSSM200 was drafted primarily by Philander Claxton and drew attention to the idea that global population growth was of concern to long-term US economic and other global stability interests.[1][3] The policy recommendations to address population growth was openly concerned with the potential appearance of “economic imperialism” and should be carefully approached so as “not be seen … as an industrialized country policy to keep their strength down or reserve resources for use by the rich countries”, with a written goal of “fertility reduction.” Local organizers were introduced to how aggressive population growth strains local economy and resources and to “emphasize development and improvements in the quality of life of the poor”, later explaining such projects were for these and “other reasons”.

“We live in a Fascist nation, what now?”- by Chris Armitage

kumarplocher, August 25, 2025 [Daily Kos]

“I researched every attempt to stop fascism in history. The success rate is 0%. Once they win elections, it’s already too late.”
“In 1933, German conservatives thought they could control Hitler. Two years later, they were being executed in their own homes. I spent weeks researching this question, desperately looking for counter-examples, for hope, for any time in history where people successfully stopped fascists after they started winning elections.
Here’s what I found: Once fascists win power democratically, they have never been removed democratically. Not once. Ever.
I know that sounds impossible. I kept digging, thinking surely someone, somewhere, stopped them. The actual record is so much worse than you think….
And here’s the part that breaks your heart. Violence works. For them. Fascists use violence while claiming to be victims. They create chaos that “requires” their authoritarian solution. Then they purge anyone who opposes them. Meanwhile, democrats keep insisting on following rules that fascists completely ignore. They file lawsuits. They write editorials. They vote on resolutions. And fascists just laugh and keep consolidating power….
The statistics are brutal. Fascist takeovers prevented after winning power democratically: zero. Average length of fascist rule once established: 31 years. Fascist regimes removed by voting: zero. Fascist regimes removed by asking nicely: zero. Most were removed by war or military coups, and tens of millions died in the process….
Based on the historical record, there are exactly three ways this goes. Option one: Stop them before they take power. Option two: War. Option three: Wait for them to die of old age….
So let’s stop pretending we’re in the “prevention” phase and start talking about what you do when fascists already control the institutions but haven’t fully consolidated power yet. Because historically, nobody’s been here before, not like this….
Garrett Graff, August 25, 2025
The United States, just months before its 250th birthday as the world’s leading democracy, has tipped over the edge into authoritarianism and fascism. In the end, faster than I imagined possible, it did happen here. The precise moment when and where in recent weeks America crossed that invisible line from democracy into authoritarianism can and will be debated by future historians, but it’s clear that the line itself has been crossed.

I think many Americans wrongly believe there would be one clear unambiguous moment where we go from “democracy” to “authoritarianism.” Instead, this is exactly how it happens — a blurring here, a norm destroyed there, a presidential diktat unchallenged. Then you wake up one morning and our country is different.

Today, August 25, 2025, is that morning. Something is materially different in our country this week than last….

Saying that our country has tipped over an invisible edge into an authoritarian state plainly is important — and easier than most in the media and pundit class will pretend it is. They will presumably for some period of time — perhaps even a long period of time — stick to euphemisms (with lines like “No president has asserted such direct and sweeping control over the nation’s capital” and “Through immigration crackdowns and cultural purges, President Trump is wielding government power to enforce a more rigid, exclusionary definition of what it means to be American.”) and continue to give voice to “both siders,” but the reality is that only one political party is responsible for this moment. They will say that Trump’s motives are inscrutable or unclear — but the effect of Trump’s governing style is undeniable.

American fascism looks like the president using armed military units from governors loyal to his regime to seize cities run by opposition political figures and it looks like the president using federal law enforcement to target regime opponents.

American fascism looks like the would-be self-proclaimed king deploying the military on US soil not only not in response to requests by local or state officials but over — and almost specifically to spite — their vociferous objections….

It looks like a president, who is supposed to be the figurehead of the party of small government, is extorting US companies for the regular act of doing business — earning his good will in recent weeks has required seizing parts of major US companies or imposing bizarre taxes on others in exchange for his personal support.…

It looks like a country where our largest and most powerful corporate titans line up to pay tribute personally — delivering literal gold to the president in full view of cameras — and where foreign governments bribe him with largesse as gross as a 747 plane for his personal use after he leaves office, and where media companies have to censor their own staffs in order to be allowed to operate.

It looks like a country where inconvenient figures are kidnapped and disappeared overseas to torture gulags with no due process or dumped in countries where they have no possible connection. Kilmar Albrego Garcia has been punished for months with the full weight of the US government simply because he embarrassed the Trump administration. It looks like a country where the government, devoid of irony, is reopening concentration camps on the site of some of the country’s darkest hours of history where it previously hosted concentration camps.

It looks like a government where agency by department, people who try to uphold the rule of law are being purged — sometimes for nothing more than personal friendships or because they voiced an inconvenient fact, and where even the loyalists deemed insufficiently loyal are cashiered. Billy Long, the stunningly unqualified former cattle auctioneer placed in charge of the IRS, evidently was removed after he tried to uphold the most basic legal requirements for sharing taxpayer data.

It looks like a country where Trump assumes he can control and dictate our historywhat books we readour arts, and even our sports heroes. He assumes there is no line between his taste and our nation.

Just months short of the nation’s 250th birthday, Donald Trump is close to batting a thousand at speed-running the very abuses of power that led to the Founders to write the Declaration of Independence in the first place. Does any of this sound familiar:

  • He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments
  • He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
  • He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
  • He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
  • He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
  • For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world
  • For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent
  • For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury
  • For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences….

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 24, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 24, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

Neoliberalism is not a viable option

Richard Murphy, August 22  2025 [Funding the Future]

… a fascinating blog post by someone called Blair Fix.

He analysed fascism in what seems like an entirely original way, showing that its roots are, in effect, in mediaeval theocracy, because the language used by those of fascist persuasion is remarkably similar to that found in some 17th, and maybe 18th, century political mediaeval theocratic thought, after which periods the language of the enlightenment displaced that of the theocrats, although the latter is now on the rise again….

In his analysis of fascist writing, Blair Fix identified three common threats. One was the significant overuse of violent symbolism. Words like annihilation, bloodshed, conquer, extermination and fighting were substantially overused when compared to the body of normal writing of the periods when fascist or similar ideas were written.

The second was a significant quantity of emotion-laden judgment, typified by the use of words like betrayed, cowardice, enemies, hatred, humiliation, slander and treason.

Third, he found there was a significant use of what appear to be quasi-religious, e.g. references to the Almighty, blessings, providence and the eternal….

The Deep Roots of Fascist Thought

[Economics from the top down, via Funding the Future 08-22-2025]

…In this essay, I’ll use word frequency to track the spread of fascist ideology. The journey starts with a trip to 1930s Europe, where we’ll encounter the works of Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler (translated into English). The rantings of these two villains will serve as our corpus of fascist text. From this text, we’ll extract the ‘jargon’ of fascism — the words that Mussolini and Hitler use frequently and overuse relative to mainstream English. With this jargon, we’ll then track the popularity of fascist thinking in written language….

…In hindsight, the delusions of 2010 seem rather quaint. So was it then that neo-fascism first took root? Turning to our linguistic data, the answer is no. The seeds of today’s neo-fascism were planted decades earlier, in the 1980s. Figure 3 shows the trend….

…the fall of the Soviet Union left capitalism alone — free to be plagued by its own excesses. What would follow was a period of free-market cravenness which made the rich richer and left the poor to fend for themselves. Unsurprisingly, amidst the humiliation of this class war, dark ideas brewed. But for years, folks in the mainstream didn’t listen. Even when Trump won the presidency, elites dismissed it as an accident — a brief departure from the norm. It was not. Trump, it seems, is riding a wide wave of fascist discontent. We ignore it at our own peril….

…reflect on the common roots of injustice, which I think are fairly simple. They stem from the belief in innate inequality. Pick any horrific act, and you will find it easier to perform if you declare the victim a lesser human. Likewise, if you view the victim as your equal, the same act feels appalling. So it is the belief in human inequality which motivates injustice. And it is this shared belief in inequality which unifies the various forms of far-right politics. (This is Corey Robin’s thesis, explored in his book The Reactionary Mind.)2….

Figure 4: The deep roots of fascist thought in English writing. When we trace Mussolini and Hitler’s fascist jargon back in time, we find that ‘fascism’ seems to be overwhelmingly an ideology of the past. The frequency of fascist jargon was highest in 18th-century English writing and then declined continuously until the early 20th century. [Sources and methods]….

…Then I’ve tracked the frequency of these words over four centuries of German publishing. The results are unambiguous. In German books, the high point of fascist thought came in the 1600s, three centuries before Hitler seized power….

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]3

Pentagon plan would create military ‘reaction force’ for civil unrest 

Alex Horton and David Ovalle, August 12, 2025 [Washington Post]

Trump’s FBI Raid of John Bolton’s Home Looks Like a “Five-Alarm Fire”

Greg Sargent, August 22, 2025 [The New Republic]

  • Longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon explicitly declared the other day that ICE officers will indeed be employed during the 2026 midterm elections in large numbers to monitor voting booths, again floating undocumented voters as the bullshit pretext to justify it. Bannon is not in a position to compel this, of course, but it’s clear the MAGA movement now sees Trump’s militarization of cities as a precursor to the use of law enforcement and/or the military to intimidate voters in large numbers, or foment a crisis atmosphere designed to help the GOP, or both.
  • Last but not least, as we reported, a recent internal Department of Homeland Security memo outlines the hopes of senior DHS officials for substantially escalated military involvement in domestic law enforcement going forward. It even declares that military operations like the one in L.A. may be needed “for years to come.”

Trump Says Chicago ‘Probably Next’ for National Guard Invasion

Brett Wilkins, August 23, 2025 [CommonDreams]

Military lawyers to handle civilian crimes in DC 

[The Hill, via Naked Capitalism 08-22-2025]

Trump administration to begin continuous police-state surveillance of 55 million US visa holders 

[WSWS, via Naked Capitalism 08-22-2025]

Trump’s “Truth” About Voting

Joyce Vance, Aug 18 2025 [Civil Discourse]

…Trump elaborated on the post Monday afternoon, saying the quiet part out loud: “If you [end] mail in voting, you’re not gonna have many Democrats get elected,” he said in the Oval Office. Trump mumbles a bit as he’s making the comment, but the context is plain….

  • Trump claims that “We are now the only Country in the World that uses Mail-In Voting. All others gave it up because of the MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD ENCOUNTERED.” That’s not true. Countries including Canada, the United KingdomGermanyAustralia, and Switzerland use mail in ballots, and there is no more suggestion of fraud there than there is here….
  • Trump claims he will sign an executive order to this effect (he hasn’t yet) because “the States are merely an ‘agent’ for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY.” That’s another wild and false claim. Congress sets the date and the time for national elections, but all other matters are reserved to the states, and each state runs its own elections with its own rules. If that wasn’t clear to Trump previously, it should be now. In June, a judge blocked the part of Trump’s March executive order that sought to stop states from counting mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but arrived afterward. The judge emphasized that presidents can’t impose their views about how to conduct elections on the states….

Trump Demands: Ditch Vote-By-Mail. Republicans Shouldn’t

Bill Scher, August 19, 2025 [Washington Monthly]

Donald Trump declared on his social media network that he is “going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS” and that he will do it unilaterally. He continued:

“WE WILL BEGIN THIS EFFORT, WHICH WILL BE STRONGLY OPPOSED BY THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEY CHEAT AT LEVELS NEVER SEEN BEFORE, by signing an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections. Remember, the States are merely an “agent” for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do.”

‘Psychological warfare’: Internal data shows true nature of Alligator Alcatraz 

[Miami Herald, via Naked Capitalism 08-21-2025]

Why are you so massively “obsessed” with Slavery?

Frank Vyan Walton, August 19, 2025 [DailyKos]

Trump: “The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future…”

“Slavery was very, very, very bad, and I hope that view continues to be reflected in our national museums,” said deputy opinion editor James Hohmann at the Washington Post….

Legal analyst and Substacker Aaron Parnas questioned Trump’s demand that museums talk about “the Future.”

“Also, why would museums talk about the future?” Parnas questioned….

Professor of human rights law Steve Peers mocked, “MAKE SLAVERY GREAT AGAIN!”

Power at any cost: It’s Trump Capitulation Disorder.

Thomas Mills, Aug 22, 2025 [PoliticsNC]

The FBI is raiding John Bolton’s house this morning. Bolton served as Trump’s National Security Advisor during his first term and as Ambassador to the UN under George W. Bush. Since the end of Trump’s term, Bolton has been a steady and harsh critic of Trump, calling him unfit to be president.

Alarm bells should be ringing, but, if they are, Republicans won’t hear them or won’t heed them. The people who once decried government agents as “jack-booted thugs,” now shrug when federal troops are deployed to US cities or the president uses the FBI to go after his political enemies, of whom John Bolton is one.

Republicans call Democrats’ fear of Trump’s authoritarian actions and impulses “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” In reality, their acceptance of behavior they once derided is Trump Capitulation Disorder….

Strategic Political Economy

How Trump Is Undoing 80 Years of American Greatness

Garrett M. Graff [New York Times, via The Big Picture August 17, 2025]

What America may find is that we have squandered the greatest gift of the Manhattan Project — which, in the end, wasn’t the bomb but a new way of looking at how science and government can work together….

Organizations like the national labs at Oak Ridge, Los Alamos and Berkeley that grew out of the Manhattan Project became the backbone of a stunning period of scientific and technological advances in the decades after the war. They were joined by the National Science Foundation (founded in 1950); Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA (founded in 1958); and the National Institutes of Health, which became a major grant-maker after the war — not to mention a host of other agencies like NASA and the Department of Energy….

[TW: Graff is strictly correct in focusing on the Manhattan Project, but he misses the larger picture, which was the creation of a communal “team” of government, universities, and private institutions, organized by the national government to create and perfect the technologies needed to win World War Two. These included much more than the atomic bomb, such as radar, proximity fuses, the aerodynamics of laminar flow, penicillin, packaged foods, and more.

[Especially glaring is Graff’s omission of Vannevar Bush, the dean of Department of Electrical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who Roosevelt put in charge of the Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD). At the end of the war, Bush wrote a report that firmly established the principle that science was a public good which required adequate sustained funding by the federal government:

Science the Endless Frontier — A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, July 1945  

(United States Government Printing Office, Washington: 1945

[Writing in response to a request from President Roosevelt for an outline of what to do after the war, Bush argued that basic scientific research was essential for long-term technological progress and economic growth, and had to be supported even in the absence of any identifiable immediate commercial application or profitability. He called for the creation of an independent, federally funded agency to support basic research and talent development in universities and industry. Bush’s report directly influenced Congress’ creation of the National Science Foundation in 1950. Bush’s model of the NSF is credited with promoting and steering the development of the computer, microchips and electronic miniaturization, the Internet, medical devices and procedures, and much more.

[In July 1945, The Atlantic Monthly published an essay by Vannevar Bush, “As We May Think,”

Of what lasting benefit has been man’s use of science and of the new instruments which his research brought into existence? First, they have increased his control of his material environment. They have improved his food, his clothing, his shelter; they have increased his security and released him partly from the bondage of bare existence. They have given him increased knowledge of his own biological processes so that he has had a progressive freedom from disease and an increased span of life. They are illuminating the interactions of his physiological and psychological functions, giving the promise of an improved mental health.

Science has provided the swiftest communication between individuals; it has provided a record of ideas and has enabled man to manipulate and to make extracts from that record so that knowledge evolves and endures throughout the life of a race rather than that of an individual.

There is a growing mountain of research. But there is increased evidence that we are being bogged down today as specialization extends. The investigator is staggered by the findings and conclusions of thousands of other workers—conclusions which he cannot find time to grasp, much less to remember, as they appear. Yet specialization becomes increasingly necessary for progress, and the effort to bridge between disciplines is correspondingly superficial….

Erin Malone, June 16, 2002, Foreseeing the Future: The legacy of Vannevar Bush

In 1945 a seminal article appeared in The Atlantic Monthly. Titled, “As We May Think,” the article’s author, Vannevar Bush (1890–1974), proposed a new mechanical machine to help scholars and decision makers make sense of the growing mountains of information being published in to the world. This article presaged the idea of the Internet and the World Wide Web and was directly influential on the fathers of the hypertext and the Internet as we know it today. Ted Nelson, who coined the term “hypertext” in 1967, describes Bush’s article as describing the principles of it….

George P. Landow, author of Hypertext: the convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology says of Bush, “Bush’s idea of the memex, to which he occasionally turned his attention for three decades, directly influenced Ted Nelson, Douglas Englebart Andreis Van Dam and other pioneers in computer hypertext. […] In “As We May Think” and “Memex Revisited” Bush proposed the notion of blocks of text joined by links and he also introduced the terms links, linkages, trails and web to describe his conception of textuality. Bush’s description of the memex contains several other seminal, even radical, conceptions of textuality.”

 

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 17, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 17, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

Pentagon plan would create military ‘reaction force’ for civil unrest 

Alex Horton and David Ovalle, August 12, 2025 [Washington Post]

The Trump administration is evaluating plans that would establish a “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force” composed of hundreds of National Guard troops tasked with rapidly deploying into American cities facing protests or other unrest, according to internal Pentagon documents reviewed by The Washington Post.
The plan calls for 600 troops to be on standby at all times so they can deploy in as little as one hour, the documents say. They would be split into two groups of 300 and stationed at military bases in Alabama and Arizona, with purview of regions east and west of the Mississippi River, respectively.

Siege Mentality: Trump’s DC Takeover to Crush His Own Demons — This is not a distraction from the Epstein situation, it’s a projection of it.

Jim Stewartson, Aug 11, 2025 [MindWar]

Immigration agents told a teenage US citizen: ‘You’ve got no rights.’ He secretly recorded his brutal arrest

[The Guardian, via The Big Picture August 10, 2025]

Video from Kenny Laynez-Ambrosio, 18, puts fresh scrutiny on the harsh tactics used to reach the Trump administration’s ambitious enforcement targets.

Trump: Now the Cops Can ‘Do Whatever the Hell They Want’

Harold Meyerson, August 12, 2025 [The American Prospect]

…D.C.’s police union reacted to Trump’s takeover with unconcealed glee; like many cop unions, it gives voice to those officers who see themselves as occupying hostile territory and being held back from sufficiently forceful action. The union, in an official statement it released yesterday, said it “acknowledges and supports the President’s announcement this morning to assume temporary control of the MPD in response to the escalating crime crisis in Washington, DC. The Union agrees that crime is spiraling out of control, and immediate action is necessary to restore public safety.”….

Just as the presence of troops in L.A. provoked protests, so Trump is hoping that the quality of his now enhanced D.C. policing will provoke protests even if the quantity of newly deployed troops and agents isn’t in itself up to the task. In his press conference yesterday, he all but ordered the cops to run amok. Currently, he said, “they’re not allowed to do anything. But now they are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.”

Masked Border Protection Agents Open Fire on Family’s Truck After Smashing Its Windows

Brad Reed, Aug 17, 2025 [CommonDreams]

A video of the incident filmed from inside the truck showed the passengers asked the agents to provide identification, which they declined to do.

An agent was then heard demanding that the father, who had been driving the truck, get out of the vehicle. Seconds later, the agent started smashing the car’s windows in an attempt to get inside the vehicle.

The father then hit the gas to try to escape, after which several shots could be heard as agents opened fire. Local news station KTLA reported that, after the father successfully fled the scene, he called local police and asked for help because “masked men” had opened fire on his truck.

“Federalizing” D.C. 

Steve Vladek [via Naked Capitalism 08-12-2025]

…it seems worth putting into context both the historical relationship between the federal government and the District of Columbia and the relevant current statutes. To make a long story short, the Constitution gives the federal government “plenary” authority over the “seat of government.” But just about everything else—including the fact that the District of Columbia is the “seat of government”—is up to Congress.

And although Congress has retained, both for itself and the President, more authority over D.C. than over any other federal enclave (including, as especially relevant today, with regard to the National Guard and the Metropolitan Police Department), the critical point for present purposes is that it was Congress that created and stood up a local government in 1973. Congress may have the constitutional power to return the city to true federal control, but the President can’t do it all by himself….

Trump’s crackdown hits Washington — federalized police NOT deployed in DC’s high crime areas

ZACK STANTON, 08/17/2025 [politico.com/playbook]

For supporters of the president’s actions, crime in the district is a blaring crisis that merits an overwhelming federal response to avoid something like failed-state status. They point out that crime, while on a downward trend, is unacceptably commonplace (the district’s homicide rate is still “almost as high as New York’s at its most dangerous, in 1990,” NYT’s Maureen Dowd notes). It demands a round-the-clock response, with FBI agents patrolling the street on foot. … And yet, much of the federal response has been concentrated in some of the safest areas of the city rather than those neighborhoods most devastated by crime. More than half of the district’s homicides last year occurred across the Anacostia River in Wards 7 and 8, The Atlantic’s Michael Powell writes; as recently as Friday, they had yet to see much of a federal response, per USA Today’s Josh Meyer.

How Pretexts Work — A manufactured crisis unfolds.

Hamilton Nolan, Aug 15, 2025 [How Things Work]

Trump’s Invasion Of D.C. Started On K Street

[The Lever, August 12, 2025]

Before the president seized control of Washington, D.C.’s police, corporate lobbyists posed as local businesses to drum up panic about local crime.

Heather Cox Richardson. August 11, 2025 [Letters from an American]

The administration is also consolidating power over the economy. Greg Ip of the Wall Street Journal noted today that the U.S. is marching toward a form of state capitalism in which Trump looks much like the Chinese Communist Party, exercising political control not just over government agencies but over companies themselves. “A generation ago conventional wisdom held that as China liberalized, its economy would come to resemble America’s,” Ip wrote. “Instead, capitalism in America is starting to look like China.”

Ip points to the government’s partial control over U.S. Steel that it took as a condition for Nippon Steel’s takeover, the $1.5 trillion of promised investment from trading partners that Trump has claimed the right to direct personally, the 15% of certain chip sales of Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices to China that will go to the administration (although who or what entity will get that money I can’t figure out), and Trump’s demand that the chief executive of Intel resign.

Ip calls this system of state capitalism “a hybrid between socialism and capitalism in which the state guides the decisions of nominally private enterprises.” He notes that it is a “sea change from the free market ethos the U.S. once embodied.”

Ip also notes that state capitalism is a means of political control, using the power of the state to crush political challenges. “In Trump’s first term, CEOs routinely spoke out when they disagreed with his policies such as on immigration and trade,” Ip writes. “Now, they shower him with donations and praise, or are mostly silent.” Ip pointed out that Trump is deploying financial power and regulatory power to cow media companies, banks, law firms, and government agencies he thinks are not sufficiently supportive.

Trump Has a Bonkers New Rating System for Private Companies

Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling, August 15, 2025 [The New Republic]

The Trump administration has released a scorecard to rank the endeavors of some 553 companies and trade associations to advance the president’s agenda and his “big, beautiful bill.”

Organizations are ranked on the sheet as strong, moderate, or low, Axios reported Friday, with ratings built off social media posts, press releases, video testimonials, ads, White House event attendance, and other budget law–oriented efforts.

The data is being circulated among White House senior staff as a temperature gauge on how to interact with companies and open calls with K Street (a nickname for Washington’s business district)….

Congress may have the spending power, but Trump can usurp it if they won’t protect it. And they haven’t

Joyce Vance, Aug 14, 2025 [Civil Discourse]

This afternoon, a three-judge panel in the D.C. Circuit signed off on the Trump administration’s efforts to block funds for foreign assistance that have been appropriated by Congress. Despite arguments made by the plaintiffs that this violates Congress’ Article II Spending powers, the court ruled that only the head of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has the ability to bring Impoundment Control Act (ICA) claims. Impoundment refers to a decision by a president to delay spending or withhold funds that Congress has allocated in the budget. The GAO was not a party to this lawsuit, although it has made multiple findings that this administration has violated the ICA in other regards.

The court’s decision was 2-1, with Judges Karen Henderson and Gregory Katsas in the majority and Judge Florence Pan dissenting. As Judge Pan notes in dissent, they reframed the issues argued by the government in order to rule in its favor, so that they could “excuse the government’s forfeiture of what they perceive to be a key argument, and then rule in the President’s favor on that ground, thus departing from procedural norms that are designed to safeguard the court’s impartiality and independence.” There will likely be a motion to ask the full court to rehear the case en banc, with all active judges sitting, before the losing party takes it to the Supreme Court….

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 10, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 10, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

UNLOCKED: The Epstein/Trump/Israel Connection Unpacked (w/ Whitney Webb) (YouTube Video)

Briahna Joy Gray interviews Whitney Webb, July 30, 2025 [Bad Faith podcast]

[TW: Webb does an extraordinary job detailing the organized crime backgrounds of Trump and Epstein. Gray was left flabbergasted and visibly shaken by the information. I was also flabbergasted, but because here was someone finally discussing a few key facets of USA and British history that very, very few historians are willing to consider: the World War Two merger between organized crime and intelligence agencies begun during Operation Underworld, when the Office of Naval Intelligence recruited Joseph LanzaMeyer Lansky, and Lucky Luciano​​​​​​​ to watch for and report any possible Axis espionage and saboteur operations in U.S. northeastern ports. Webb next outlines how organized crime “went legit” by taking over Wall Street and the “mergers and acquisitions” racket in the 1970s and 1980s. This last point is something many “influencers” have denied, some with near hysteria.

[Trump’s mentor was mafia lawyer Roy Cohn, and Webb discusses  Cohn’s ties to organized crime that were also shared by Epstein’s mentor, Les Wexner. Webb also mentions the CIA / Iran-Contra involvement in the illegal narcotics trade uncovered by San Jose Mercury News reporter Gary Webb in 1996, and some of the British “corporate raiders,” such as Sir James Michael Goldsmith, who spearheaded the criminal infiltration of Wall Street. (It is not mentioned if and how Gary Webb and Whitney Webb are related.) This may be the most explosive 90 minute show you will ever listen to in your life. It paints a clear picture of the malevolent criminally-inclined elites who have seized political and economic control of USA and the west.]

[At 59:59 BJG asks why? “why are these people who have everything still getting involved in illegal and immoral activities.”

[My answer:  to understand why, you have to ignore the nostrums and ideas of liberalism, and turn to the founding philosophy of civic republicanism, which has been under attack by USA’s would be oligarchs since before the Constitution was signed and ratified. The quick answer to BJG’s question is found in the1667 epic poem Paradise Lost, by English republican John Milton: when Satan explains why he rebelled against God by saying “Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven.”

[Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven. That is the mindset of an oligarch.

[The great weakness of liberalism is its moral ambivalence about the accumulation of wealth. Liberal thinkers such as John Locke defend the accumulation of great wealth under the principles of individual liberty. But as should be abundantly clear by the events of the past few decades, great wealth corrupts a society. While liberalism prefers to ignore this problem, the general socio-economic dynamic of this corruption is a central theme of civic republicanism.

In The Classical Republicans: An Essay in the Recovery of a Pattern of Thought in Seventeenth Century England (Evanston, Northwestern University , 1945), Zera S. Fink, quotes from English republican political theorist Algernon Sidney, who was executed for “treason” against the crown in 1683: “Man” he wrote, “is of an aspiring nature, and apt to put too high a value on himself. They who are raised above their brethren, though but a little, desire to go farther; and if they gain the name of king, they think themselves wronged and degraded, when they are not suffered to do what they please. In these things they never want masters; and the nearer they come to a power that is not easily restrained by law, the more passionately they desire to abolish all that opposes it.” Even when a prince was virtuous and began by desiring nothing more than the power allowed him by law, he was subject to greater temptations to invade the liberty of his subjects than human nature could be expected to withstand. “The strength of his own affections,” Sydney declared, “will ever be against him. Wives, children, and servants will always join with those enemies that arise in his own breast to pervert him; if he has any weak side, any lust unsubdued, they will gain the victory. He has not searched into the nature of man, who thinks that anyone can resist when he is thus on all sides assaulted.”  Monarchy, in short, by the very constitution of human nature, tended always to degenerate into tyranny. It was a defective form of government because in the most important place of all it was lacking in those adequate restraints on the defects of human nature which all the classical republicans saw as an essential of any well-contrived government.

[In The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in America (New York, NY, Columbia University Press, 2007), Michael J. Thompson writes, “Any political community that suffers from severe imbalances between rich and poor is in danger of losing its democratic character…”  And he explicitly states that “the contemporary tolerance of economic inequality is actually the result of liberalism and liberal thought itself.” Thompson  explains that the political philosophy of civic republicanism recognizes the great danger posed by concentrations of wealth and economic power.

In “The American Revolutionaries, the Political Economy of Aristocracy, and the American Concept of the Distribution of Wealth, 1765-1900,” James L. Huston argued that the founders developed a political economy of aristocracy which identified the avaricious rich as a primary threat to the republic.

The revolutionaries’ concern over the distribution of wealth was prompted by a tenet in the broad and vague political philosophy of republicanism. In contrast to nations in which monarchs and aristocrats dominate the state, republics embodied the ideal of equality among citizens in political affairs, the equality taking the form of citizen participation in the election of officials who formulated the laws. Drawing largely on the work of seventeenth-century republican theorist James Harrington, Americans believed that if property were concentrated in the hands of a few in a republic, those few would use their wealth to control other citizens, seize political power, and warp the republic into an oligarchy. Thus to avoid descent into despotism or oligarchy, republics had to possess an equitable distribution of wealth….

[In The Laws, his last and longest dialogue, Plato wrote that “there should exist among the citizens neither extreme poverty nor, again, excessive wealth, for both are productive of great evil.” We should not be surprised The Laws is the least studied, least known, and least quoted of Plato’s books.

[The Roman historian Plutarch traced the degeneration of the Roman republic into an oligarchic empire to the growing imbalance between rich and poor.  Another Roman, the lawyer, scholar, philosopher, orator, and writer, Cicero, discussed the dangers of economic inequality, but also included a warning of the peculiar psychological condition of the rich:

“When one person or a few stand out from the crowd as richer and more prosperous, then, as a result of their haughty and arrogant behavior, there arises [a government of one or a few], the cowardly and weak giving way and bowing down to the pride of wealth.”

[The work of another historian of ancient Rome, Livy, was the basis of Machiavelli’s description of how the rich of Rome corrupted the Senate. In his Discourses on Livy, Machiavelli described how the Romans tried to restore political balance by creating tribunes to represent the plebians to counterbalance the control of the Senate by the rich, but the unceasing resistance and plotting against the tribunes by the rich of Rome eventually brought about the end of the Roman republic.

[The lesson for Machiavelli was “Let, then, a republic be constituted where there exists, or can be brought into being, notable equality.”

[In The Spirit of Laws, Book 5. Chapter 5, ”In what Manner the Laws establish Equality in a Democracy,” Montesquieu wrote,

“Though real equality be the very soul of a democracy, it is so difficult to establish, that an extreme exactness in this respect would not be always convenient. Sufficient is it to establish a census, which shall reduce or fix the differences to a certain point: it is afterwards the business of particular laws to level, as it were, the inequalities, by the duties laid upon the rich, and by the ease afforded to the poor. It is moderate riches alone that can give or suffer this sort of compensation; for as to men of overgrown estates, everything which does not contribute to advance their power and honor is considered by them as an injury.…”

[Montesquieu thus echoed Cicero by identifying the peculiar psycho-pathology of the rich by noting “to men of overgrown estates, everything which does not contribute to advance their power and honor is considered by them as an injury.” Does this not precisely define Trump and his vindictiveness?

[In the Christian Bible we find Matthew 6:24:

“No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.”

[And, more pointedly, James 5:1-6:

Come now, you rich, weep and howl for the miseries that are coming upon you. Your riches have rotted and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and silver have corroded, and their corrosion will be evidence against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have laid up treasure in the last days. Behold, the wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by fraud, are crying out against you, and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts. You have lived on the earth in luxury and in self-indulgence.

[And there is the famous warning in that “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” This famous biblical quotation is repeated three times in the New Testament, in Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:25, and Luke 18:25.

[The problem of the rich dominating society and destroying it by their aggressive greed and ambition is not confined to the West. The view that the rich posed a danger to good government was also enunciated by the Chinese philosopher Confucius:

“In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.”

[According to Confucius, in a well governed society there should be a rough level of economic equality — there should be no poverty. But when a society is no longer well governed, economic inequality arises and there are the impoverished many and the rich few, who abuse and ignore the law and social norms, resulting in misrule. The existence of the wealthy therefore are a marker of a badly governed society.

[And in his Analects, Confucius wrote

If there were an honorable way to get rich, I’d do it, even if it meant being a stooge standing around with a whip. But there isn’t an honorable way, so I just do what I like.

[Oligarchy is the mortal enemy of a republic. “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” is a well-known saying, but it is just as important to understand that wealth corrupts and concentrated wealth corrupts absolutely. What Gray and Webb discuss is the general corruption that has arisen by our society’s toleration of great wealth, and the social damage it has caused, including the escalating problem of elite impunity.

[The Transcendentalists — among whom were Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, Louisa May Alcott, and Walt Whitman — were particularly hostile to liberal philosopher John Locke. The Transcendentalist view of Locke was summarized by Orestes Brownson, in The Boston Quarterly Review, in January 1839:

…Locke reduces man to the capacity of receiving sensations, and the faculty of reflecting on what passes within us. According to him we have no ideas which do not enter through the senses, or which are not formed by the operations of the mind on ideas received by means of sensation.

[Locke’s] system of philosophy… is no less fatal to political liberty than to religion and morality… This philosophy necessarily disinherits the mass. It denies to man all inherent power of attaining to truth. In religion, if religion it admits, it refers us not to what we feel and know in ourselves [such a sense of fairness and justice], but was said and done in some remote age, by some special messenger from God; it refers us to some authorized teacher, and commands us to receive our faith on his word, and to adhere to it on peril of damnation. It therefore destroys all free action of the mind, all independent thought, all progress, and all living faith. In politics it must do the same. It cannot found the state on the inherent rights of man; the most it can do, is to organize the state for the preservation of such conditions, privileges, and prescriptions, as it can historically verify….

The doctrine, that truth comes to us from abroad, cannot coexist with true liberty… The democrat is not he who believes in the people’s capacity of being taught, and therefore graciously condescends to be their instructor; but he who believes that Reason, the light which shines out from God’s throne, shines into the heart of every man, and that truth lights her torch in the inner temple of every man’s souk, whether patrician or plebian, a shepherd or a philosopher, a Croesus or a beggar. It is only on the reality of that inner light, and on the fact that it is universal, in all men, and in every man, that you can found a democracy, which shall have a firm basis, and which shall be able to survive that storms of human passions.

[Zohran Mamdani has been repeatedly attacked for saying we shouldn’t have billionaires. But he badly flubs his explanation of this view. The simple fact is that a republic cannot survive the rise of oligarchy. A republic must have very high taxes on wealth and income, to disrupt the concentration of wealth and prevent the inherent despotism of the rich from ever emerging in the first place.

[Our problem now is that a plutocratic oligarchy has already parasitically fastened itself on our society and polity, and we need to dislodge it, and restore the governing principles of civic republicanism.]

Howie Klein, August 06, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]
Thomas Neuburger, August 03, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 03, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 03, 2025

by Tony Wikrent

 

Trump not violating any law

‘He who saves his Country does not violate any Law’

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]

Trump’s Complaint About One Judge Is An Attack On The Entire Judiciary

Joyce Vance, July 31, 2025 [Civil Discourse]

…it should come as no surprise that judges are actively concerned. When the Judicial Conference of the United States met recently, the issue surfaced. That resulted in the Justice Department filing a complaint against District Judge James “Jeb” Boasberg. There is no way to soft-pedal this. The Trump administration wants to go to war with the federal judiciary. They’ve been moving that direction ever since the start of this administration.

A little background about the Judicial Conference….

On Monday, DOJ filed a complaint accusing Judge Boasberg of “making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration.” CBS News was told by sources that Bondi directed her chief of staff, Chad Mizelle, to file the complaint with the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Sri Srinivasan. The Judge’s comments were supposedly made, according to DOJ, at the March 11 Judicial Conference meeting. Those meetings are private, but DOJ apparently obtained reports, which led them to claim Judge Boasberg tried to “improperly influence” the Chief Justice and other judges, which is ludicrous, just on its face. DOJ complains that the comments reflect bias against the Trump administration and that Judge Boasberg should be censured by the court….

Beyond the impropriety of making this kind of completely unprecedented complaint with no basis for it, there are some real issues with the argument the government tries to make. For one thing, the Judge’s comments weren’t made in public, which is the predicate for DOJ’s entire complaint. They were privately made, in the supposed confidence of colleagues (no word on who leaked them or how accurate that leak was). Then, there’s the fact that the comments reflect legitimate concerns that are widely circulating among judges, lawyers, and the general public. There are more technical flaws in the legal arguments DOJ makes, invoking the Judicial Canons of Ethics, that we’ll delve into if this goes anywhere. But what it adds up to is wholly inadequate to merit further consideration by the court and certainly not something that rises to the level of warranting judicial sanctions. The fault here lies with DOJ and its slippery practices….

[TW: If a Federal judge believes the regime may ignore court rulings, in what other forum is the judge supposed to discuss this?  ]

‘Banana Republic’: Experts Horrified as Trump Demands BLS Director’s Firing Over Bad Jobs Report

Brad Reed, August 01, 2025 [CommonDreams]

Trustworthy US Jobs Info Is the Latest Victim of Trump’s War on Facts

Robert Reich, Aug 02, 2025 [Inequality Media, via CommonDreams]

[TW: Ian and I have long been very critical of USA economic statistics / national income accounting. Basically, the statistics do not show the economic destruction which has occurred during the past half century of deindustrialization and financializaton. For example, statistics of raw steel production in USA show that the number of tons of steel produced has declined slightly. But adjust that number to a per capita basis, and the fact that steel production is about half what it was five decades ago becomes glaring. The same goes for housing units built, new vehicles produced, and new vehicles sold, and many other indicators of real economic activity.

[But in all the stories stirred up by Trump’s firing of the BLS director, none of this mentioned. Nor is there any mention of the many problems with national income accounting and GDP statistics that have been documented for decades now. Nor any mention of undertaking a rigorous process of evaluating and changing how USA creates its economic statistics. All this tells me is that the worst possible interpretation of Trump’s action is correct: he fired the BLS director for entirely political reasons because Trump demands that national income accounting and GDP statistics show that Trump’s policies are “Making America Great Again,” whether of not that is the actual reality.]

Campaign’s Interactive Tool Tracks How Much Trump and GOP Are Raising the Cost of Living

Julia Conley, July 31, 2025 [CommonDreams]

Trump’s Domestic Use of Military Set to Get Worse, Leaked Memo Shows

Greg Sargent, August 2, 2025 [The New Republic]

A Department of Homeland Security memo obtained by TNR signals top-level discussions about a potential escalation of the Pentagon’s domestic anti-immigration role, and lays out new details.

National Guard Ordered to Do ICE Paperwork at Immigration Facilities in 20 States

Nick Turse, July 31 2025 [The Intercept]

Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to immigration facilities further blurs the line between military and law enforcement.

ICE, Georgia Sheriff’s Office Combine Forces To Keep A Salvadoran Journalist Locked Up Indefinitely 

[Tech Dirt, via Naked Capitalism 08-01-2025]

A Clear Epstein Backgrounder and Where We Are Today

Thomas Neuburger, July 31, 2025 [God’s Spies]

“The elite classes have for a long time distinguished themselves from ordinary people by their adherence to a different code of morality.”
—Darryl Cooper, paraphrasing the New York Times….

Let’s start with a recent interview of researcher Darryl Cooper by Tucker Carlson, as it’s the most complete and listenable backgrounder on Epstein’s history that I could find.

Yes, I know — both of these people can be highly politized commenters of a stripe some don’t like. If you’re among those people, feel free to skip this video.

But don’t. While Carlson gets a little “Christian” near the end — annoying to those who aren’t, or aren’t of his brand — Cooper is rigorous about sorting evidence from supposition, even likely supposition, and he stays away from dogma, even regarding “Pizzagate,” on which he has an interesting take. And Carlson, to his credit, keeps his intrusions to a minimum and his questions on point….

Page 3 of 46

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén