I’ve been predicting Saudi Arabia’s crackup for some time. Their society is completely dependent on oil revenues, and their rulers have no idea how to diversify off in time.
Couldn’t happen to a bigger bunch of jerks, though as usual, many innocents and powerless people will get dead, raped, and tortured as Saudi Arabia falls.
This piece by Jeff Spross, hasn’t changed my mind. It’s about how the Sauds are selling assets to get US dollars so they can pay for the changeover.
The expert Spross talks to has ideas on what the Sauds could use that money on:
Kaboub proposes the country use advanced aquaponics to build up its self-sufficiency in food — aquaponics can be done indoors for ten percent of the water used by traditional agriculture — and switch over to renewable energy. “It’s a prime location for wind and solar and geothermal,” he noted. Kaboub’s also a fan of a universal job guarantee, which he thinks can serve as a staging policy to lower unemployment and build up other domestic industries.
What does the royal family, lead by the Crown Prince bin Salman (of the Yemeni war and the chopping a journalist to pieces in the Istanbul embassy) think is a good plan?
For the moment, though, the Saudi government has a different vision. Their plan focuses somewhat on renewables and diversifying manufacturing, but the big initiative is on moving the economy more into high-end luxury tourism.
I am entirely sincere when I say that I never imagined they would be this stupid.
The Saud family’s days ruling Saudi Arabia are numbered. Praise God, because only he could have made them quite this imbecilic.
Lifted from the comments, by StewartM
Tourism?
As someone who knows someone who worked a stint in Saudi Arabia, this is gobsmacking. Let’s just name a few:
1) Want to go on a desert excursion? Oops, be careful, you may meet some religiously conservative armed Bedouins.
2) Hey, how about scuba diving along the coast? Well, don’t have an accident or the bends, because hospital services are limited to deal with it.
3) Public displays of affection are a no-no (we’re talking heterosexual husband and wife; don’t even thing same-gender). Mixing of the genders if they’re unrelated is a no-no too. The moral code is enforced by “volunteer” police zealots who have the power to detain you if they think you are breaking Islamic law.
Homosexuality and other violations of the Saudi Islamic moral code apply even in compounds exclusively for foreigners and are enforced in surprise raids.
4) Alcohol and pornography are banned. Mind you, the Saudis may deem your favorite character on the video game on your phone or laptop “pornographic” and seize your device, so their definition of “pornography” probably doesn’t match yours.
5) See something interesting? Want to take a photo? Don’t. You could be arrested for it, as a spy.
6) Don’t talk about politics, especially if it casts even the slightest detraction against the Saudi government or royal family.
7) Don’t wear any non-Islam religious emblems. Public observances of any other religious in a crime.
8) And let’s not talk about the difficulty in obtaining both an entry visa, and an exit visa, to boot. (I’d presume they’d fix that).
In short, Saudi Arabia would be a land where rich tourists would check into their $5,000-a-night hotel in a gated Western compound, and just stay there, not daring to go out. Oh, even then there might be a raid if immoral conduct is suspected.
Unless Crown Prince bin Salman’s plan involves remaking Saudi Arabia into a secular state, from stem to stern, Saudi Arabia will be a country where almost nobody wants to go visit. This is by design:
“My Kingdom will survive only insofar as it remains a country difficult to access, where the foreigner will have no other aim, with his task fulfilled, but to get out.” — King Abdul Aziz bin Saud, c. 1930
The results of the work I do, like this article, are free, but food isn’t, so if you value my work, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.
StewartM
Tourism?
As someone who knows someone who worked a stint in Saudi Arabia, this is gobsmacking. Let’s just name a few:
1) Want to go on a desert excursion? Oops, be careful, you may meet some religiously conservative armed Bedouins.
2) Hey, how about scuba diving along the coast? Well, don’t have an accident or the bends, because hospital services are limited to deal with it.
3) Public displays of affection are a no-no (we’re talking heterosexual husband and wife; don’t even thing same-gender). Mixing of the genders if they’re unrelated is a no-no too. The moral code is enforced by “volunteer” police zealots who have the power to detain you if they think you are breaking Islamic law.
Homosexuality and other violations of the Saudi Islamic moral code apply even in compounds exclusively for foreigners, and are enforced in surprise raids.
4) Alcohol and pornography are banned. Mind you, the Saudis may deem your favorite character on the video game on your phone or laptop “pornographic” and seize your device, so their definition of “pornography” probably doesn’t match yours.
5) See something interesting? Want to take a photo? Don’t. You could be arrested for it, as a spy.
6) Don’t talk about politics, especially if it casts even the slightest detraction against the Saudi government or royal family.
7) Don’t wear any non-Islam religious emblems. Public observances of any other religious in a crime.
8) And let’s not talk about the difficulty in obtaining both an entry visa, and an exit visa, to boot. (I’d presume they’d fix that).
In short, Saudi Arabia would be a land where rich tourists would check into their $5,000-a-night hotel in a gated Western compound, and just stay there, not daring to go out. Oh, even then there might be a raid if immoral conduct is suspected.
Unless Crown Pirince bin Salman has this plan or remaking Saudi Arabia into a secular state, from stem to stern, Saudi Arabia will be a country where almost nobody wants to go visit. This is by design:
“My Kingdom will survive only insofar as it remains a country difficult to access, where the foreigner will have no other aim, with his task fulfilled, but to get out.” — King Abdul Aziz bin Saud, c. 1930
A
While I share your sentiments I still think the House of Saud will be governing the Arabian for a long time yet. I would be the US, Canada and Great Britain break into smaller countries before Saudi Arabia does.
If I had a dollar……..
heinzy
Why the hell would anyone want to go to Saudi Barbaria for tourism? They\’d have to build a city like Vegas, but even more dependent on resources like water. And I can see the boycotts lined up against them, I certainly would boycott them and shun people who would dare go to SA for tourism. You\’re right Ian, they\’re done. Good riddance.
bruce wilder
@ A
at the risk of pointing out the obvious, non-African Arabia is already several countries: the numerous Persian Gulf statelets, Jordan and large parts of Iraq and Syria and Palestine are all historically Arabia. Arguably, so are Yemen and Oman. As one thread of connection, the Hashemites, the predecessors of the Sauds in Mecca, have been the royal family of Syria (1918-1920), Hejaz (1916–1925), Iraq (1921–1958) and Jordan (1921-date). the political geography of the area has been fractured since before the Ottomans claimed the caliphate. the Saudi ambition to use the central region of Najd to dominate the east and west of the peninsula has not been an especially successful program historically, subject to challenge from many powerful opponents.
DMC
And they could go into solar, for power and desalination of sea water so easily, it fairly boggles the mind. Clean, fresh water is going to be the commodity the Saudis wish they were producing. But it’s going to take a palace coup at the very least, to change the direction MbZ has the country headed in. With Machiavelli in mind, he’s injured a substantial percentage of the royal family but he’s only killed a few, so how long before they decide he’s more trouble than he’s worth? And the old man as well…turn things over to some prince of another line, start making some rational decisions for a change. Probably they’re hosed any which way but the current leadership is just putting rockets on the sled to hell.
Joe
Im guessing he wants to copy dubai then
different clue
Perhaps the “tourism” plan is merely about creating a diversion while all the Saudi family members above a certain money-wealth cuttoff-level quietly move a lot of money out of KSA to pre-planned shelter zones in other countries. At some point they may quietly sneak out of the country, leaving the commoners and the Wahhabi religious kakistocracy behind to fight with al Qaeda and ISIS over the future.
Hopefully Iraq and Iran would be able to liberate the Eastern Province in order to keep al Qaeda and/or ISIS from getting it.
Too bad. So sad. And to think, Saudi Arabia could have become the “Saudi Arabia” of renewable electricity.
Chuck Mire
Welcome to the living Old Testament…
Hugh
Only about 1% of Saudi Arabia is arable land. In 1950, it had a population of 3.1 million. In 2019, it has a population of 33.9 million. It’s a case of do the math.
Gabriel
To follow up on that great comment by StewartM, below John Dolan (aka Gary Brecher) piece in the NSFWCorps when TechCrunch put out a story about how KSA could be the next Silicon Valley. The Dumbest Thing I’ve Ever Read. Saudi Arabia As The Next Silicon Valley”
Stirling S Newberry
Don’t worry, something more stupid is coming.
different clue
@Gabriel,
I gather John Dolan at some point took over the Gary Brecher name and column. But I have always had a feeling that someone else began the Gary Brecher feature, perhaps even a “real” Gary Brecher himself.
I would have to spend many hours reading all the War Nerd columns from Column Number One going forward to see if my memory-feel of a “change at some point” would still stand. I can say that what I regard as the previous ” Gary Brecher” never mentioned “faculty meetings” in a column.
But shortly after the handoff, the new “Gary Brecher” ( Garyjohn Dolanbrecher) put a referrence to “faculty meetings” as something he had used to have to go to into a column. That was clearly not the old “Gary Brecher” I had used to read.
sglover
I thought Saudi “investment” plans, the ones that really lead to action, have always mostly concerned parking dollars in London or Luxemborg or almost anywhere other than Saudi Arabia.
However, “high end luxury tourism” sure does sound like a nice lure, should the Saudi monarchy ever need to provide some (phantom) enticements to induce certain foreign saps to run errands for them. Might there be a head of state who can be bought by the promise of a casino lease? Hmmm, let’s see……