The horizon is not so far as we can see, but as far as we can imagine

Types Of Civilization Collapse

We’ve had a couple posts recently on collapse. One, by Nate Wilcox, on the possibility of civil war and a another by commenter Grim Jim on just how many people would die in a civilization collapse.

Let’s take a look at the dimensions of collapse.

First is slow vs. fast. John Michael Greer tends to push slow, though his position is more nuanced than that. In the slow collapse things just keep getting shittier, with, perhaps, some break points. (If there’s a civil war, there’s a big jump in crap.) In this model it’s hard to say exactly when the collapse happens. When did the Western Roman Empire fall? There are easily half a dozen possible dates one could argue for, and that’s a collapse complete with a barbarian invasion.

In general expect countries which can feed and fuel themselves to be in the slow collapse bucket, though there’ll be exceptions, especially if they can’t defend themselves. Canada is one of those, if it isn’t invaded by America, which it probably will be. Russia is also in it, if they don’t wind up in a nuclear war.

Remember that modern agriculture will be affected by collapse: heavy use of fertilizer, pesticides and oils makes it vulnerable. So if a country appears to have a massive surplus, well, it may not. When AMOC ends and Europe loses ten degrees celcius overnight, they may as well.

The same here is true of water: when glaciers finish melting and most snow pack is gone, there’s going to be a lot less of it. So look at where the surplus food and water is coming from.

Second is distribution by time and place. Everyone likes to quote Gibson, “the future is already here, it’s just not evenly distributed.” Some countries have already collapsed. Sri Lanka, for example. Others are further along the path: in the first world, Britain’s a good example. Within countries some places collapse first: Northern England is notably a hole. Catholic Belfast has never not been poor, and so on.

In the US there are places where we can be sure of regional collapse—as Sean-Paul pointed out to me, the Texas triangle is just going to run out of water in a couple decades. The American Southwest is doomed for pretty much the same reason.

As for that, the homelessness epidemic shows that for many Americans, the collapse is already here.

Internationally Bangladesh will be one of the first high-population countries to collapse. Among major countries, India will be one of the first. The Europeans can go any time when the Atlantic Meridian Overturning Current (AMOC) ends: and that’s due sometime in the next 50 years, as a “when not if” proposition. I don’t know Africa well enough, but obviously multiple countries there are already close to collapse and the only thin which could put that off would be concerted efforts by China (financially and developmentally) and Russia (food and resource aid.)

China’s a hard one to predict: they have huge climate change vulnerabilities, especially to flooding in the North, heat in the North and water in general. On the other hand, if they play it smart they have the world’s industrial base and the best chance of adaptation and mitigation, especially due to their alliance with Russia, which will keep them in resources and food longer than otherwise. Since Russia mutually benefits, they’ll keep the Chinese topped up as a priority.

Which leads to the bigger point: when food starts getting scarce countries will stop exporting, and this is when food importing countries will start real collapse (and food riots, and civil war.)

As for water scarcity, that’s when you’ll get water wars.

And both will exacerbate any internal tensions. When there’s not enough to eat or drink, the “other” whoever that is, is likely to get it in the neck. Countries with significant internal rifts, like India between Hindus and Muslims/High and Low-Caste will see incredible violence and mass murder of minorities. Whether that also describes America is a question much debated, but at the least there will be a vast increase in discrimination and at the worst purges or even civil war.

In Europe there will be huge backlashes against visible minorities, especially Muslim ones and perhaps also Jews, as they are tarred with genocide and accusations of controlling governments.

I would suggest to expect a general pattern of slow decline punctuated by cliff-drops. Things will slowly get shittier, then suddenly get a lot shittier. To give a small example, in Ontario where I live, before Covid you could expect to be seen in an emergency department within a couple hours and to get an MRI or CT scan within a couple months, often a few weeks. Now it takes ten to twelve hours to be seen in an emergency (unless you’re obviously bleeding out or can’t breathe) and imaging tests can take six to nine months.

In collapse some foods (starting with imported ones) will go from widely available to just not on the shelf. Medicines which are imported will stop being available, again in slow decline then suddenly, almost impossible to find.

Slow, then precipitous, then slow, then precipitous.

The general prescription here, for small groups and individuals is to make yourself as independent of the grid as possible, to figure out how to grow climate controlled food, and to find a water source. Even in slow collapse models there will be large numbers of brownouts, water will be shitty if available (hello England) and so on. If you can’t handle at least a few hours or days off-grid, life will be miserable.

Collapse isn’t a disaster movie, though there are parts of it that are. (All the people made homeless by wildfires know this, and there will be coastal inundations). Rather it’s a series of long slide, punctuated by catastrophes


My writing happens because readers donate or subscribe. If you value that writing, and you can afford to, please support it.

Previous

Briahna Joy Gray and David Sirota discuss the Democratic Party

Next

Why The Left Taking Over The Republican Party Is Even Harder Than Taking Over The Democratic Party

17 Comments

  1. j

    “How did you go bankrupt?”
    Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.”
    ― Ernest Hemingway, The Sun Also Rises

  2. bruce wilder

    Collapse is not a conspiracy theory, but . . .

    I cannot reject the hypothesis that COVID-19 was one element in a general plan for population reduction.

    Historic collapse scenarios are usually predicated on elites being unable to help themselves: either too greedy and/or too short-sighted or simply too ignorant of natural processes beyond their control to stem the tide. But, I cannot but think that John Galt is going to be greasing the skids on our collapse more deliberately than in the past — indeed, already has been. Some of that malevolence is comically ridiculous, like Elon Musk wanting to travel to Mars in a Tesla/SpaceX combo (assuming Brazil doesn’t confiscate it!) Much of it is just the usual capitalist incompetence — hare-brained schemes for climate engineering for example. But, some moves by the megalomaniacs of means — and COVID looks like one to me — or the AI/robot apocalypse in a more acutely dire scenario — could shape collapse in ways important to individuals young enough to want survival for themselves or a posterity. The normalization of genocide has powerful friends.

  3. Purple Library Guy

    You know, everyone’s talking about mortality and living standards and this and that and the other thing, but let’s get serious here: If things start to collapse, we’re going to have hardly any chocolate or coffee!

    Third world countries farm cocoa and coffee because first world countries make them do it, and trap them in a situation where they are farming this stuff they export, while importing food, at crappy terms of trade, with transnationals skimming most of the profit on the exports. But if trade starts to fall apart, if they can’t get the imported food, they’re going to dump the cocoa and coffee beans and make food to survive instead. And then I won’t be able to drink cocoa or chocolate milk! Now THAT’s a CRISIS!!!

    I may need to start stockpiling cocoa.

  4. mago

    Was it Hemingway who said the rich are different than you and me , or was it Fitzgerald?
    Doesn’t matter. It’s true whoever said it. They’re dumber, and they’ve got the power.
    Nothing to do with flowers.
    It’s sunset time for sure.
    Interesting that in the tropics the sun sets instantly. Darkness ensues.
    In the desert southwest, sunset light lingers and gradually fades.
    My sensei was fond of saying water boils suddenly, to which my rejoinder remains, yeah, but it sits on the fire for a long time.
    Wish I could send a photo of the spectacular SW sunset I’m watching from my mountainside perch.
    The moment is what we have.

  5. Eric Anderson

    I’m thinking someone has read some Stephen J. Gould.
    It seems to me you’re talking about entropic punctuated equilibrium.

    Homo Sapiens’ shelf life has expired.

  6. Revelo

    @Bruce Wilder: There’s nothing hare brained about pumping SO2 into the stratosphere to stop or even reverse global warming. Concept has been tested repeatedly at global scale every time a big volcano blows. The only problem might be effect on ozone layer from constant SO2 pumping is different (worse) from effect of those occasional volcano eruptions. Amounts of SO2 required are way less than what we are currently pumping into the troposphere (low altitude) and costs are also modest (under $100 billion for the entire world).

    The big issue is that mitigating global warming with SO2 won’t precisely restore each and every local climate to what it was in 1970 or whenever. Rather, some local areas might be very adversely affected (droughts, etc) while other local areas benefit significantly. So potential for war between those who want more/less SO2 pumping.

  7. Purple Library Guy

    Homo sapiens’ shelf life? That’s not how evolution works. A lot of people have this feeling that because the problems are all our fault and we deserve this crash, that means it will wipe us out–but it doesn’t matter what we deserve. The thing about humans is we’re harder to wipe out than cockroaches. Even before the fossil fuel era, humans could be found in practically every environment–hot, cold, mountains, plains, forests, jungles, deserts. Pretty much anywhere anything can survive, humans can. Dramatic population crashes may well be in the cards. Elimination as a species, or even ceasing to be the apex predator, not so much. I don’t see anything out there capable of competing with humans for any position in a food web that they decide is worth grabbing. As long as there is SOMETHING to eat, humans will be eating it.

    To take humans out, a disaster would have to be such as to eliminate nearly all complex multicelled life forms. The human-caused ecological and climate disaster is not going to do that. It’s going to kill a lot of species and leave a lot of drastically stunted ecosystems with all the more specialized creatures gone, plus some seriously bad desert belts near the equator where practically nothing can live. But the stunted ecosystems will still have stuff like crows and seagulls and rabbits and rats and goats and coyotes and squirrels–all the flexible, grab-whatever’s-going critters–including humans. Just, not as many because the carrying capacity will be lower.

    And eventually evolution will fill niches and ecosystems will get richer again, if we let them.

  8. Ian Welsh

    Eric,

    yes, it’s similar to punctuated equilibria but uses different mechanisms, which is why I didn’t use the term.

  9. bruce wilder

    @Revelo

    1. Focusing on a singular effect (“warming” of the atmosphere) and thinking that an intervention will have only a singular “intended” effect countering the warming is not just oversimplifying; it is missing the big picture.

    All of the waste attendant on energy use strains the earth’s capacity to assimilate waste. Heat is not the only problem contributing to global ecological collapse. There’s the increasing acidity of the oceans to take one example of another effect of CO2 release, never mind the cumulative effects of, say, microplastics pollution. Every human use of energy creates more waste. Devoting more energy use to remedying or mitigating the undesired effects instead of actively constraining low-value, marginal use of energy, including but not limited to fossil fuels, is a foolish accelerant.

  10. elkern

    SS United States – largest passenger ship ever built in the USA – is slated to be scrapped, or sunk off the coast of Florida, after falling a few years behind in paying rent in Philly. If sunk, it will be the largest artificial reef in the world. We’re Number One!

    https://hiddencityphila.org/2024/09/florida-county-to-acquire-and-sink-ss-united-states/

  11. Eric Anderson

    Yessir. I caught that. Which is why I characterized it as “entropic.”
    I nice little synthesis Ian.

    And, I also wanted to say I’m really enjoying the additional bloggers contributing. I miss it, but life has just become full to the brim. Full time dad, husband, lawyer, and soccer coach.

    Best little blog on the intertubes.

    Cheers my friend.

  12. Eric Anderson

    PLG:
    Yeah, true enough. I get that. Civilizations shelf life has expired would be more accurate.

    I say this because we seem incapable as a species of recognizing the limits to growth. If the world provided boundless resources with the infinite capacity to dispose of heat and waste; then I guess it’d be ok for everyone to strive to be a #billionaire.

    But the world doesn’t do that. We used to think it did. Hell, most of the silent generation and boomers still think it works that way.
    As such, our entire economy is based on a relic of magical thinking.
    And now that wealth and power is entrenched.
    They’re not going to just say “Whoops! Our bad.”
    No.
    They’re content to live out their privileged lives in fantasy at you, and your children’s expense.

    They will burn civilization to the ground before we can dislodge them from power.

    So, yeah. I agree humans will likely persist. Civilization, as we even remotely understand it, will not.

  13. Eric Anderson

    Bruce,

    Correct. It would only lead to what’s known as “Jevons paradox.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

  14. Carl

    @Mago: it was Fitzgerald who had a character say it in one of his short stories. Hemingway, Fitzgerald’s contemporary but completely opposite in almost every way, replied through the same medium (short story): the character’s response is, “yes, they have more money.”

  15. different clue

    Here is another addition to the death-by-attrition of civilization under way. It is from a twitter-shot that I saw on Naked Capitalism. I will try copy-pasting it and also providing a link. ( copy-paste proves difficult with captured twitter-shot screens. And I don’t have time to literally type the piece of text. It may be that the link is all I will be able to offer)

    https://x.com/nekrodvna/status/1831763632323244407/photo/1

  16. different clue

    Yes, the link appears to work. It can even be clicked on for expansion once it has been clicked open to begin with. I found it worth reading and considering.

  17. Purple Library Guy

    @Eric Anderson: Well, that I won’t argue with. I don’t think the outcome you describe is quite a done deal, but it’s certainly probable.

    On the very rich quote–my sympathies are very much with Hemingway on that one, because it was an awesome rejoinder, and I’m much more politically and, um, sort of socially in sympathy with Hemingway than with Fitzgerald. But I have to admit, Fitzgerald gets a bit burned on that. He wasn’t saying that the very rich are BETTER, he was saying that they have certain odd characteristics due to their upbringing and position, and the characteristics he went on to describe were kind of negative and I think probably based on some fairly keen observation of rich people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén